Matrix 04.632.880Recalls & reported problems
Synthes GmbH · 8.0MM TI MATRIX POLYAXIAL SCREW 80MM THREAD LENGTH · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Matrix (80)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705034745886), received between Feb 14, 2017 and Feb 14, 2017 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
Patient problems
- Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture2
- Pain2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 14, 2017Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO A NONUNION AND BROKEN SCREWS. PATIENT WAS INITIALLY IMPLANTED WITH DEPUY¿S RODS FROM T10-S2, DEPUY¿S SCREWS FROM T10-L5, AND SYNTHES¿ SCREWS AT S2 ON (B)(6) 2015 DUE TO DISC DEGENERATION AND SCOLIOSIS. NO SCREWS WERE IMPLANTED AT S1. X-RAYS TAKEN DURING A ROUTINE FOLLOW UP ON UNKNOWN DATE REVEALED THAT THE L5 RIGHT AND S2 RIGHT PEDICLE SCREWS WERE BROKEN. PATIENT ALSO HAD LEG PAIN THAT SURGEON ASSOCIATED WITH ARTHRITIS. SURGEON CONTINUED TO KEEP SURVEILLANCE ON THE SITUATION AND MONITOR THE PATIENT WITH CHECKUPS. A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2017. PATIENT WAS SYMPTOMATIC AT T8-T9, HAD CORD COMPRESSION AT T8-T9, AND EXPERIENCED A NONUNION DUE TO THE BROKEN SCREWS. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, IT WAS FOUND THAT THREE SCREWS BROKE. TWO SYNTHES¿ 8.0 MM MATRIX POLYAXIAL SCREWS BROKE AT S2 AND ONE DEPUY¿S SCREW BROKE AT THE RIGHT SIDE AT L5. NO FRAGMENTS WERE GENERATED FROM THE BROKEN SCREWS AND THEY WERE EASILY REMOVED. SURGEON ALSO REMOVED THE ROD TO PERFORM A COSTOTRANSVERSECTOMY AT T8-T9. IN ADDITION, A LAMINECTOMY WAS PERFORMED AT L5-S1. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. REVISION SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMP
Patient problems: Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture; Pain
MAUDE report 6330319 ↗InjuryFeb 14, 2017Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO A NONUNION AND BROKEN SCREWS. PATIENT WAS INITIALLY IMPLANTED WITH DEPUY¿S RODS FROM T10-S2, DEPUY¿S SCREWS FROM T10-L5, AND SYNTHES¿ SCREWS AT S2 ON (B)(6) 2015 DUE TO DISC DEGENERATION AND SCOLIOSIS. NO SCREWS WERE IMPLANTED AT S1. X-RAYS TAKEN DURING A ROUTINE FOLLOW UP ON UNKNOWN DATE REVEALED THAT THE L5 RIGHT AND S2 RIGHT PEDICLE SCREWS WERE BROKEN. PATIENT ALSO HAD LEG PAIN THAT SURGEON ASSOCIATED WITH ARTHRITIS. SURGEON CONTINUED TO KEEP SURVEILLANCE ON THE SITUATION AND MONITOR THE PATIENT WITH CHECKUPS. A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2017. PATIENT WAS SYMPTOMATIC AT T8-T9, HAD CORD COMPRESSION AT T8-T9, AND EXPERIENCED A NONUNION DUE TO THE BROKEN SCREWS. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, IT WAS FOUND THAT THREE SCREWS BROKE. TWO SYNTHES¿ 8.0 MM MATRIX POLYAXIAL SCREWS BROKE AT S2 AND ONE DEPUY¿S SCREW BROKE AT THE RIGHT SIDE AT L5. NO FRAGMENTS WERE GENERATED FROM THE BROKEN SCREWS AND THEY WERE EASILY REMOVED. SURGEON ALSO REMOVED THE ROD TO PERFORM A COSTOTRANSVERSECTOMY AT T8-T9. IN ADDITION, A LAMINECTOMY WAS PERFORMED AT L5-S1. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. REVISION SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMP
Patient problems: Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture; Pain
MAUDE report 6330281 ↗
Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL devices
- EXPEDIUM 179702000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL439 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721001Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL227 reports
- XIA 3 48230000Stryker Corporation · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL193 reports
- VIPER 186715000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL1 death167 reports
- NA 04.614.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL80 reports
- EXPEDIUM VIPER 196789480Depuy Spine, LLC · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- NA 04.615.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- Arsenal Deformity Spinal Fixation System 47127Alphatec Spine, Inc. · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL66 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page