Skip to content

UroForce® Balloon Dilation Catheter 887504Recalls & reported problems

C. R. Bard, Inc. · UroForce® Balloon Dilation Catheter · Class 2

All models of UroForce Balloon Dilation Catheter (12)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10801741052979), received between Aug 30, 2017 and May 13, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Burst Container or Vessel3
  • Material Rupture2

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Patient Problem/Medical Problem1
  • Tissue Damage1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 13, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT CUSTOMER BELIEVED THE TM STATED THE BALLOON DILATION CATHETER BURST ON A PREVIOUS USE AND SUBMITTED TO COMPLAINTS, BUT THEY WANTED TO SHARE JUST IN CASE. UROFORCE BALLOON DILATION CATHETERS WERE RECOMMENDED FOR DILATION OF THE URINARY TRACT. THIS WOULD BE CONSIDERED OFF LABEL. DISCUSSED HOW THE XFORCE N30 CATHETERS WERE RECOMMENDED FOR USE IN THE DILATION OF THE NEPHROSTOMY TRACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22009540 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 28, 2019Burst Container or Vessel; Material Rupture; Burst Container or Vessel

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON OF THE CATHETER BURST. THE PATIENT'S URETER WAS DAMAGED AND REQUIRED TEMPORARY STENTING.

    Patient problems: Patient Problem/Medical Problem; Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 8378347 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 5, 2017Burst Container or Vessel

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON OF THE CATHETER BURST, AND NO PIECES OF THE BALLOON WERE MISSING. ALLEGEDLY, THE DEVICE WAS USED WITH A CYSTOSCOPE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7082107 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 30, 2017Burst Container or Vessel

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON OF THE CATHETER BURST. IT WAS REPORTED THAT NO PIECES OF THE BALLOON WERE MISSING UPON REMOVAL.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6829470 ↗

Other DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL devices

All DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page