Skip to content

ARROW IPN924165Recalls & reported problems

Teleflex Incorporated · Pressure Injectable Arrowg+ard Blue Advance(R) One-Lumen PICC pre-loaded with Arrow(R) NaviCurve(TM) Stylet · Class 2 · Implant

All models of ARROW (1494)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10801902208696), received between Sep 21, 2023 and May 27, 2024 — classified as 9 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult or Delayed Separation” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 7 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520267
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult or Delayed Separation4
  • Material Separation2
  • Fluid/Blood Leak1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1
  • Obstruction of Flow1
  • Premature Separation1
  • Unsealed Device Packaging1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions9

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 27, 2024Difficult or Delayed Separation; Difficult or Delayed Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "THE DEVICE FEELS THICKER BUT FLIMSIER. IT SEEMS HARDER TO GET THROUGH PATIENT'S SKIN AND ALSO HAS ISSUES WITH IT BREAKING NOT CLEANLY OR NORMALLY." THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM OR CONSEQUENCE. THEY WERE REPORTED AS FINE. ASSOCIATED COMPLAINTS: 9680794-2024-00500, 9680794-2024-00499, 9680794-2024-00498 AND 9680794-2024-00496.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19399885 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 27, 2024Difficult or Delayed Separation; Difficult or Delayed Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "THE DEVICE FEELS THICKER BUT FLIMSIER. IT SEEMS HARDER TO GET THROUGH PATIENT'S SKIN AND ALSO HAS ISSUES WITH IT BREAKING NOT CLEANLY OR NORMALLY." THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM OR CONSEQUENCE. THEY WERE REPORTED AS FINE. ASSOCIATED COMPLAINTS: 9680794-2024-00500, 9680794-2024-00499, 9680794-2024-00498 AND 9680794-2024-00496.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19399861 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 27, 2024Difficult or Delayed Separation; Difficult or Delayed Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "THE DEVICE FEELS THICKER BUT FLIMSIER. IT SEEMS HARDER TO GET THROUGH PATIENT'S SKIN AND ALSO HAS ISSUES WITH IT BREAKING NOT CLEANLY OR NORMALLY." THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM OR CONSEQUENCE. THEY WERE REPORTED AS FINE. ASSOCIATED COMPLAINTS: 9680794-2024-00500, 9680794-2024-00499, 9680794-2024-00498 AND 9680794-2024-00496.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19399846 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 27, 2024Difficult or Delayed Separation; Difficult or Delayed Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "THE DEVICE FEELS THICKER BUT FLIMSIER. IT SEEMS HARDER TO GET THROUGH PATIENT'S SKIN AND ALSO HAS ISSUES WITH IT BREAKING NOT CLEANLY OR NORMALLY." THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM OR CONSEQUENCE. THEY WERE REPORTED AS FINE. ASSOCIATED COMPLAINTS: 9680794-2024-00500, 9680794-2024-00499, 9680794-2024-00498 AND 9680794-2024-00496.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19399838 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 24, 2024Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT "WHEN TRYING TO THREAD SHEATH INTRODUCER IT WAS GETTING CAUGHT UP IN THE PATIENT'S SKIN AT THE POINT OF TRANSITION FROM DILATOR TO SHEATH. THAT TRANSITION FELT THICKER AND STICKIER THAN USUAL. IT STARTED TO MUSHROOM AND SPLIT. HAD TO PULL A NEW SHEATH INTRODUCER FROM ANOTHER KIT TO COMPLETE THE INSERTION". NO PATIENT HARM OR INJURY. THE PATIENT STATUS IS REPORTED AS "FINE".

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19391254 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 17, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "AFTER THE SHEATH WAS INSERTED AND THE PICC WAS THREADED, THE INSERTER TRIED TO SEPARATE THE TABS AND ONE SEPARATED. THE NURSE WAS ABLE TO FINISH PEELING THE TWO SIDES OF THE SHEATH APART AND COMPLETE THE CASE". THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM OR CONSEQUENCE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19339312 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 17, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "THE INTRODUCER CRACKED WHEN TRYING TO BREAK APART AND PULL THE DILATOR OUT. THEY WERE ABLE TO SPLIT THE DILATOR BY PLACING PRESSURE ON THE PICC AND SLOWLY PULLING ON THE REMAINING WING." THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM OR CONSEQUENCE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19339255 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 6, 2023Fluid/Blood Leak; Obstruction of Flow; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Fluid/Blood Leak; Obstruction of Flow; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT: THE PICC WAS FUNCTIONING WELL FOR 20 DAYS AT HOME. ON MONDAY 10/9, AT APPROXIMATELY 12PM, THE HOME CARE NURSE CHANGED THE DRESSING AND DREW LABS FROM THE PICC. THE PATIENT'S WIFE REPORTED THAT SHE HAD A HARD TIME FLUSHING THE PICC AT 5:30PM AND WAS UNABLE TO ADMINISTER HIS 5:30PM MEDS. HOME CARE CAME BACK OUT ON 10/10 AND SAID THE PICC WAS LEAKING AND HAD A PINHOLE IN IT. ON ASSESSMENT IN THE ED TODAY AT 2PM, THE PICC WAS COMPLETELY OCCLUDED AND THERE WAS LEAKING THROUGH A PINHOLE AT THE 2. 5CM MARK OF PICC CATHETER. VAT NURSE REMOVED THE PICC, AND VAT PLACED THE PICC IN A BIOHAZARD BAG AND FORCEFULLY FLUSHED THE PICC. A LARGE CLOT CAME OUT OF THE PICC AND VISIBLE SMALL LEAK AT THE 2.5CM MARK OF CATHETER. A NEW LINE WAS INSERTED IN THE OPPOSITE ARM. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM OR CONSEQUENCE. THEY WERE REPORTED AS FINE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18072274 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 21, 2023Unsealed Device Packaging; Unsealed Device Packaging

    IT WAS REPORTED THE PACKAGE WAS OPEN AT THE TOP LEFT CORNER UPON REMOVING FROM THE CASE. THE KIT WAS NO LONGER STERILE. NO PATIENT I NVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17794901 ↗

Other Catheter, intravascular, therapeutic, long-term greater than 30 days devices

All Catheter, intravascular, therapeutic, long-term greater than 30 days devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page