ARROW IPN924165Recalls & reported problems
Teleflex Incorporated · Pressure Injectable Arrowg+ard Blue Advance(R) One-Lumen PICC pre-loaded with Arrow(R) NaviCurve(TM) Stylet · Class 2 · Implant
All models of ARROW (1494)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10801902208696), received between Sep 21, 2023 and May 27, 2024 — classified as 9 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult or Delayed Separation” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult or Delayed Separation4
- Material Separation2
- Fluid/Blood Leak1
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
- Obstruction of Flow1
- Premature Separation1
- Unsealed Device Packaging1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions9
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 27, 2024Difficult or Delayed Separation; Difficult or Delayed Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "THE DEVICE FEELS THICKER BUT FLIMSIER. IT SEEMS HARDER TO GET THROUGH PATIENT'S SKIN AND ALSO HAS ISSUES WITH IT BREAKING NOT CLEANLY OR NORMALLY." THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM OR CONSEQUENCE. THEY WERE REPORTED AS FINE. ASSOCIATED COMPLAINTS: 9680794-2024-00500, 9680794-2024-00499, 9680794-2024-00498 AND 9680794-2024-00496.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19399885 ↗MalfunctionMay 27, 2024Difficult or Delayed Separation; Difficult or Delayed Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "THE DEVICE FEELS THICKER BUT FLIMSIER. IT SEEMS HARDER TO GET THROUGH PATIENT'S SKIN AND ALSO HAS ISSUES WITH IT BREAKING NOT CLEANLY OR NORMALLY." THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM OR CONSEQUENCE. THEY WERE REPORTED AS FINE. ASSOCIATED COMPLAINTS: 9680794-2024-00500, 9680794-2024-00499, 9680794-2024-00498 AND 9680794-2024-00496.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19399861 ↗MalfunctionMay 27, 2024Difficult or Delayed Separation; Difficult or Delayed Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "THE DEVICE FEELS THICKER BUT FLIMSIER. IT SEEMS HARDER TO GET THROUGH PATIENT'S SKIN AND ALSO HAS ISSUES WITH IT BREAKING NOT CLEANLY OR NORMALLY." THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM OR CONSEQUENCE. THEY WERE REPORTED AS FINE. ASSOCIATED COMPLAINTS: 9680794-2024-00500, 9680794-2024-00499, 9680794-2024-00498 AND 9680794-2024-00496.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19399846 ↗MalfunctionMay 27, 2024Difficult or Delayed Separation; Difficult or Delayed Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "THE DEVICE FEELS THICKER BUT FLIMSIER. IT SEEMS HARDER TO GET THROUGH PATIENT'S SKIN AND ALSO HAS ISSUES WITH IT BREAKING NOT CLEANLY OR NORMALLY." THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM OR CONSEQUENCE. THEY WERE REPORTED AS FINE. ASSOCIATED COMPLAINTS: 9680794-2024-00500, 9680794-2024-00499, 9680794-2024-00498 AND 9680794-2024-00496.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19399838 ↗MalfunctionMay 24, 2024Premature Separation; Premature Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT "WHEN TRYING TO THREAD SHEATH INTRODUCER IT WAS GETTING CAUGHT UP IN THE PATIENT'S SKIN AT THE POINT OF TRANSITION FROM DILATOR TO SHEATH. THAT TRANSITION FELT THICKER AND STICKIER THAN USUAL. IT STARTED TO MUSHROOM AND SPLIT. HAD TO PULL A NEW SHEATH INTRODUCER FROM ANOTHER KIT TO COMPLETE THE INSERTION". NO PATIENT HARM OR INJURY. THE PATIENT STATUS IS REPORTED AS "FINE".
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19391254 ↗MalfunctionMay 17, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "AFTER THE SHEATH WAS INSERTED AND THE PICC WAS THREADED, THE INSERTER TRIED TO SEPARATE THE TABS AND ONE SEPARATED. THE NURSE WAS ABLE TO FINISH PEELING THE TWO SIDES OF THE SHEATH APART AND COMPLETE THE CASE". THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM OR CONSEQUENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19339312 ↗MalfunctionMay 17, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "THE INTRODUCER CRACKED WHEN TRYING TO BREAK APART AND PULL THE DILATOR OUT. THEY WERE ABLE TO SPLIT THE DILATOR BY PLACING PRESSURE ON THE PICC AND SLOWLY PULLING ON THE REMAINING WING." THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM OR CONSEQUENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19339255 ↗MalfunctionNov 6, 2023Fluid/Blood Leak; Obstruction of Flow; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Fluid/Blood Leak; Obstruction of Flow; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT: THE PICC WAS FUNCTIONING WELL FOR 20 DAYS AT HOME. ON MONDAY 10/9, AT APPROXIMATELY 12PM, THE HOME CARE NURSE CHANGED THE DRESSING AND DREW LABS FROM THE PICC. THE PATIENT'S WIFE REPORTED THAT SHE HAD A HARD TIME FLUSHING THE PICC AT 5:30PM AND WAS UNABLE TO ADMINISTER HIS 5:30PM MEDS. HOME CARE CAME BACK OUT ON 10/10 AND SAID THE PICC WAS LEAKING AND HAD A PINHOLE IN IT. ON ASSESSMENT IN THE ED TODAY AT 2PM, THE PICC WAS COMPLETELY OCCLUDED AND THERE WAS LEAKING THROUGH A PINHOLE AT THE 2. 5CM MARK OF PICC CATHETER. VAT NURSE REMOVED THE PICC, AND VAT PLACED THE PICC IN A BIOHAZARD BAG AND FORCEFULLY FLUSHED THE PICC. A LARGE CLOT CAME OUT OF THE PICC AND VISIBLE SMALL LEAK AT THE 2.5CM MARK OF CATHETER. A NEW LINE WAS INSERTED IN THE OPPOSITE ARM. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM OR CONSEQUENCE. THEY WERE REPORTED AS FINE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18072274 ↗MalfunctionSep 21, 2023Unsealed Device Packaging; Unsealed Device Packaging
IT WAS REPORTED THE PACKAGE WAS OPEN AT THE TOP LEFT CORNER UPON REMOVING FROM THE CASE. THE KIT WAS NO LONGER STERILE. NO PATIENT I NVOLVEMENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17794901 ↗
Other Catheter, intravascular, therapeutic, long-term greater than 30 days devices
- Groshong NXT ClearVue Catheter 7617405Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days2 deaths1,708 reports
- Groshong NXT ClearVue Catheter 7655405Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days2 deaths1,536 reports
- PowerPICC Catheter 3174118Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days1 recall402 reports
- L-Cath™ S/L PICC S/L 26GA (1.9F) x 30cmArgon Medical Devices, Inc. · Catheter,Intravascular,Therapeutic,Long-Term Greater Than 30 Days2 recalls245 reports
- PowerPICC SOLO2 Catheter 1194108DBard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days2 recalls216 reports
- Broviac 0600520Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days1 recall265 reports
- Groshong® Catheter 7717405Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days279 reports
- PowerPICC® Catheters 1174108DBard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days1 recall222 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page