Skip to content

Retracta G34197Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · Retracta Detachable Embolization Coil · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Retracta (15)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
12
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10827002341972), received between May 13, 2018 and Apr 30, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 10 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult or Delayed Separation” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult or Delayed Separation3
  • Premature Separation3
  • Stretched3
  • Entrapment of Device2
  • Material Separation2
  • Separation Failure2
  • Unraveled Material2
  • Break1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Code Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 30, 2026Difficult or Delayed Separation

    THE FOLLOWING EVENT REGARDING RETRACTA DETACHABLE EMBOLIZATION COILS WAS REPORTED VIE THE LITERATURE ARTICLE: NASSAR, M.; HOLT, M.; AFIFI, A.M.; NAZZAL, M. AN UNCOMMON COMPLICATION OF COIL EMBOLIZATION: COIL DEPLOYMENT SYSTEM MALFUNCTION LEADING TO RETAINED INTRA-AORTIC WIRE. J. VASC. SURG. CASES INNOV. TECH. 2026, 12, HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.JVSCIT.2026.102155. CASE REPORT "A 52-YEAR-OLD WOMAN WITH A PAST MEDICAL HISTORY OF NOONAN SYNDROME AND HYPERLIPIDEMIA WHO WAS ADMITTED OWING TO LETHARGY AND ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY. NOONAN SYNDROME IS A GENETIC DISORDER THAT IS ASSOCIATED WITH SHORT STATURE, CHARACTERISTIC FACIES, AND HEART DEFECTS; SOME PATIENTS HAVE COAGULATION DEFECTS. THE PATIENT SUBSEQUENTLY DEVELOPED SHORTNESS OF BREATH AND MELENA, WHICH WAS ATTRIBUTED TO UPPER GI BLEEDING. IN ADDITION, SHE WAS FOUND TO HAVE SUBMASSIVE PULMONARY EMBOLISM WITH RIGHT HEART STRAIN. IT IS UNCLEAR WHETHER THERE WAS A CONTRIBUTION OF THE PATIENT¿S HISTORY OF NOONAN SYN-DROME TO HER COAGULOPATHY, BUT IT DOES RAISE SUSPICION. THE PATIENT WAS TAKEN TO THE ENDOVASCULAR SUITE FOR ENDOSCOPIC EVALUATION AND INTERVENTION FOR THE GI BLEED AND CATHETER-DIRECTED MECHANICAL THROMBECTOMY OF THE PULMONARY AR

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25046317 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 2, 2025Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A RETRACTA DETACHABLE EMBOLIZATION COIL HAD "COME OFF" THE CATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN USED ANOTHER DEVICE TO COMPETE THE PROCEDURE. AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS OR REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE EVENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT IS CURRENTLY UNAVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21057825 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 10, 2024Entrapment of Device; Difficult or Delayed Separation; Entrapment of Device; Difficult or Delayed Separation

    NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20423066 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 6, 2024Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A RETRACTA DETACHABLE EMBOLIZATION COIL DEPLOYED PREMATURELY DURING PREPARATION. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISPOSED BY THE USER FACILITY. AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS OR REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19477168 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 20, 2023Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, IT WAS REPORTED THE CATHETER WAS FLUSHED PRIOR TO EACH COIL DEPLOYMENT. THE PHYSICIAN IS UNSURE WHAT CAUSED THE CATHETER TO PREMATURELY DEPLOY. HE NOTED WHEN HE USES THE REPORTED CATHETER WITH THE RETRACTA COIL, THE COIL DOES NOT DEPLOY CORRECTLY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17977155 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 1, 2022Unraveled Material; Separation Failure; Unraveled Material; Separation Failure

    IN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON (B)(6). 2022, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROBLEM OCCURRED WHEN ATTEMPTING TO RELEASE THE COIL FROM THE DELIVERY WIRE. A REPLACEMENT DEVICE WAS NOT USED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE COIL WAS TO BE RELEASED BETWEEN THE INFERIOR VENA CAVA AND THE MESENTERIC.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15896997 ↗
  • InjuryApr 12, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THE DELIVERY WIRE OF A RETRACTA DETACHABLE EMBOLIZATION COIL SEPARATED. THE DEVICE WAS REQUIRED FOR USE DURING A FISTULA GRAM WAS TO BE PLACED IN THE BRACHIAL VEIN. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN THE USER ATTEMPTED TO DETACH THE COIL, THE DELIVERY WIRE BROKE. THE USER ATTEMPTED TO GRASP THE WIRE FRAGMENT BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. AS A RESULT, THE PATIENT REQUIRED A CUT-DOWN PROCEDURE TO SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED THE WIRE. NO OTHER ADVERSE EFFECTS WERE REPORTED FOR THIS INCIDENT. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THIS WAS THE ONLY COIL PLACED. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT FLUSH THE CATHETER BEFORE COIL DEPLOYMENT. THE TORQUE DEVICE WAS USED DURING DEPLOYMENT. THE COIL JUNCTION WAS WITHIN THE TIP OF THE CATHETER DURING DEPLOYMENT.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 14088163 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 13, 2020Stretched; Unraveled Material; Difficult or Delayed Separation; Stretched; Unraveled Material; Difficult or Delayed Separation

    NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 10268005 ↗
  • InjuryJul 22, 2019Material Separation; Separation Failure; Material Separation; Separation Failure

    NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 8813160 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 21, 2018Difficult to Remove; Retraction Problem; Stretched

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNABLE TO DETACH THE RETRACTA EMBOLIZATION COIL WHEN AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO DEPLOY IT, AND IT WAS THEN REMOVED SUCCESSFULLY. IT WAS FURTHER NOTED THAT A SECTION OF THE COIL WAS ELONGATED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED IMPACT TO THE PATIENT AS A RESULT OF THE PRODUCT ISSUE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7626888 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 21, 2018Entrapment of Device; Stretched; Failure to Advance

    THE COMPLAINANT REPORTED THAT THE RETRACTA EMBOLIZATION COIL WAS STUCK AT THE JUNCTION OF THE TIP OF THE CATHETER AND WOULD NOT ADVANCE THROUGH IT. FURTHERMORE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE COIL WAS STRETCHED ON THE END OF THE END COIL. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7626463 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 13, 2018Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED DURING A COIL IMPLANTATION, THE DELIVERY WIRE ON A RETRACTA DETACHABLE EMBOLIZATION COIL BROKE. THIS BREAKAGE OCCURRED WHEN THE DOCTOR ATTEMPTED TO DEPLOY THE COIL BY TURNING THE GUIDE CARRIER, HOWEVER, THE COIL WAS WOUND WITH PART OF THE GUIDE. AS RESISTANCE WAS FELT, THE DOCTOR FORCEFULLY PULLED ON THE DEVICE, WHICH MADE THE COIL DEPLOY AND WIRE BREAK. AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS OR REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7509704 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page