Skip to content

Evolution G46539Recalls & reported problems

Cook Vandergrift Inc. · Evolution 9 Fr Mechanical Dilator Sheath Set · Class 2

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10827002465395), received between Dec 2, 2025 and Dec 2, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Align” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Failure to Align1
  • Material Too Rigid or Stiff1

Patient problems

  • Cardiac Perforation1
  • Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension1
  • Pericardial Effusion1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 2, 2025Material Too Rigid or Stiff; Failure to Align; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Material Too Rigid or Stiff; Failure to Align; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED ON THE MEDWATCH FORM: IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 21 PART 803, SUBPART B, 803.22(B)(2), THIS LETTER IS TO NOTIFY AND PROVIDE YOU THE INFORMATION PHILIPS RECEIVED ON (B)(6) 2025 WHICH REPORTED THAT DURING A LEAD EXTRACTION PROCEDURE, A PERICARDIAI EFFUSION WAS OBSERVED, AND THORACOTOMY WAS PERFORMED TO REPAIR A CORONARY SINUS PERFORATION. THE PATIENT SURVIVED THE PROCEDURE. A LEAD EXTRACTION PROCEDURE COMMENCED TO REMOVE RA, RV, AND LV LEADS DUE TO CIED SYSTEM/POCKET INFECTION. THE RA AND RV LEADS WERE PREPPED WITH LLDS AND THE LV LEAD WAS PREPPED WITH SUTURE AND STEEL WIRE TO PROVIDE TRACTION. THE RA AND RV LEADS WERE REMOVED SUCCESSFULLY. USING A SPECTRANETICS 12F GLIDELIGHT ADVANCEMENT COULD NOT BE MADE OVER THE CALCIFIED SUBCLAVIAN REGION. SWITCHING TO A (B)(6)8. SF BYRD DILATOR SHEATH, PROGRESS WAS MADE TO THE RA. NEXT, THE GLIDELIGHT COULD ADVANCE WITHOUT RADIATION TO RA, AND THE LV LEAD BROKE. CHANGING TO A (B) (6) 9F EVOLUTION, AND ALIGNING AXIS TO THE CORONARY SINUS, THE LEAD SEPARATED. AFTER THAT, SWITCHING TO A FEMORAL APPROACH AND RIGHT SUBCLAVIAN APPROACH, A 14F GLIDELIGHT AND OSPIKA SNARE WAS USED TO GRASP THE CONDUCTOR WIRE. THE GLIDELIGHT WAS ADVANCED WITHOU

    Patient problems: Cardiac Perforation; Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension; Pericardial Effusion

    MAUDE report 23697631 ↗

Other DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION devices

All DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.