AtriCure cryoICE cryoSPHERE Cryoablation System (REF A001009)Recalls & reported problems
Atricure, Inc. · CRYOS, Packaged Assembly · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10840143902543), received between Aug 31, 2022 and Jan 4, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Use of Device Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Use of Device Problem1
Patient problems
- Cryogenic Burn3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 4, 2024Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
ON (B)(6) 2023 A MALE PATIENT UNDERWENT A VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC NUSS PROCEDURE WITH CONCOMITANT CRYO NERVE BLOCK USING A CRYOS PROBE. DURING PROCEDURE, SURGEON RELEASED THE LUNG FOLLOWING A FREEZE APPLICATION. THE CRYOS PROBE ADHERED TO LUNG TISSUE DURING REMOVAL. AS A PRECAUTION, THE SURGEON DID WEDGE RESECTION OF THE PORTION OF LUNG TISSUE THAT ADHERED TO THE PROBE, IN ORDER TO PREVENT A POSSIBLE DELAYED PNEUMOTHORAX. THERE WAS NO CONFIRMED DEVICE MALFUNCTION, AND THIS EVENT WAS THE RESULT OF A PROCEDURAL COMPLICATION.
Patient problems: Cryogenic Burn
MAUDE report 18443015 ↗InjuryJan 12, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2022, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A PECTUS REPAIR WITH CRYO NERVE BLOCK. TISSUE NEAR THE INCISION SITE CAME IN CONTACT WITH THE CRYOS PROBE AND DISCOLORED. SURGEON ELECTED TO EXCISE THIS TISSUE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED, AND THERE WERE NO ADDITIONAL REPORTED COMPLICATIONS WITH THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED DEVICE MALFUNCTION, AND THE ADVERSE EVENT WAS THE RESULT OF A PROCEDURAL COMPLICATION.
Patient problems: Cryogenic Burn
MAUDE report 16147070 ↗InjuryAug 31, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2022 THAT A MALE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN OFF-PUMP, NUSS / CRYO-NERVE BLOCK (CNB) PROCEDURE. DURING THE CNB, THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED AN AREA OF FROSTBITE ON THE PATIENT'S SKIN. THE IMPACTED SKIN WAS EXCISED. POST PROCEDURE, PATIENT WAS DOING WELL. THERE WAS NO REPORTED DEVICE MALFUNCTION, AND THE ADVERSE EVENT WAS THE RESULT OF A PROCEDURAL COMPLICATION.
Patient problems: Cryogenic Burn
MAUDE report 15331399 ↗
Other Device, Surgical, Cryogenic devices
- AtriCure cryoICE cryoSPHERE+ Cryoablation System CRYOSP-LAtricure, Inc. · Device, Surgical, Cryogenic1 report
- AtriCure cryoICE cryoSPHERE Cryoablation SystemAtricure, Inc. · Device, Surgical, Cryogenic1 report
- AtriCure cryoICE cryoSPHERE+ Cryoablation SystemAtricure, Inc. · Device, Surgical, Cryogenic1 report
- AtriCure cryoICE Cryoablation System (CRYO2)Atricure, Inc. · Device, Surgical, Cryogenic1 report
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page