Skip to content

AtriCure cryoICE cryoSPHERE Cryoablation System (REF A001009)Recalls & reported problems

Atricure, Inc. · CRYOS, Packaged Assembly · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10840143902543), received between Aug 31, 2022 and Jan 4, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Use of Device Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • Cryogenic Burn3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 4, 2024Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    ON (B)(6) 2023 A MALE PATIENT UNDERWENT A VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC NUSS PROCEDURE WITH CONCOMITANT CRYO NERVE BLOCK USING A CRYOS PROBE. DURING PROCEDURE, SURGEON RELEASED THE LUNG FOLLOWING A FREEZE APPLICATION. THE CRYOS PROBE ADHERED TO LUNG TISSUE DURING REMOVAL. AS A PRECAUTION, THE SURGEON DID WEDGE RESECTION OF THE PORTION OF LUNG TISSUE THAT ADHERED TO THE PROBE, IN ORDER TO PREVENT A POSSIBLE DELAYED PNEUMOTHORAX. THERE WAS NO CONFIRMED DEVICE MALFUNCTION, AND THIS EVENT WAS THE RESULT OF A PROCEDURAL COMPLICATION.

    Patient problems: Cryogenic Burn

    MAUDE report 18443015 ↗
  • InjuryJan 12, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ON (B)(6) 2022, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A PECTUS REPAIR WITH CRYO NERVE BLOCK. TISSUE NEAR THE INCISION SITE CAME IN CONTACT WITH THE CRYOS PROBE AND DISCOLORED. SURGEON ELECTED TO EXCISE THIS TISSUE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED, AND THERE WERE NO ADDITIONAL REPORTED COMPLICATIONS WITH THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED DEVICE MALFUNCTION, AND THE ADVERSE EVENT WAS THE RESULT OF A PROCEDURAL COMPLICATION.

    Patient problems: Cryogenic Burn

    MAUDE report 16147070 ↗
  • InjuryAug 31, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ON (B)(6) 2022 THAT A MALE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN OFF-PUMP, NUSS / CRYO-NERVE BLOCK (CNB) PROCEDURE. DURING THE CNB, THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED AN AREA OF FROSTBITE ON THE PATIENT'S SKIN. THE IMPACTED SKIN WAS EXCISED. POST PROCEDURE, PATIENT WAS DOING WELL. THERE WAS NO REPORTED DEVICE MALFUNCTION, AND THE ADVERSE EVENT WAS THE RESULT OF A PROCEDURAL COMPLICATION.

    Patient problems: Cryogenic Burn

    MAUDE report 15331399 ↗

Other Device, Surgical, Cryogenic devices

All Device, Surgical, Cryogenic devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page