STERLING H9101Recalls & reported problems
Conmed Corporation · STERLING OVAL BUR, 4.0 MM · Class 1
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10845854017210), received between Dec 18, 2018 and Feb 26, 2019 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
- Material Fragmentation1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 26, 2019Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THE H9101, SHAVER BUR, FELL OFF IN A SHOULDER JOINT DURING AND ARTHROSCOPIC SHOULDER PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2019. THE BUR FRAGMENT WAS SAFELY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S JOINT. THERE WERE NO ISSUES NOTICED WITH THE BUR PRIOR TO USE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME TYPE OF BUR AND LOT NUMBER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT OR USER INJURIES AND NO REPORTED DELAY. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED BASED ON DEVICE MALFUNCTION WITH POTENTIAL FOR INJURY UPON REOCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8370741 ↗MalfunctionDec 18, 2018Break; Break
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THE H9101 BUR, BROKE OFF IN THE PATIENT'S BONE DURING A SHOULDER ARTHROSCOPY PROCEDURE. THE BUR WAS BEING USED THROUGH A CANNULA TO RESECT BONE WHEN IT BROKE OFF. THE FRAGMENT WAS RETRIEVED USING A KELLY CLAMP AND GRASPER. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. THERE WAS NO REPORTED DELAY AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AS PLANNED. NO OTHER BUR WAS NEEDED TO FINISH THE SURGERY. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED BASED ON DEVICE MALFUNCTION WITH POTENTIAL FOR INJURY UPON REOCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8176148 ↗
Other BUR, SURGICAL, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY devices
- NA 5820066012Stryker Corporation · Bur, Surgical, General & Plastic Surgery1 recall4 reports
- NA 310.25SSynthes GmbH · BUR, SURGICAL, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY1 recall0 reports
- Arthrex® AR-8400OBEArthrex, Inc. · BUR, SURGICAL, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY48 reports
- NA 310.21Synthes GmbH · BUR, SURGICAL, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY29 reports
- NA 351.27Synthes GmbH · BUR, SURGICAL, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY28 reports
- Arthrex® AR-8500OBEArthrex, Inc. · BUR, SURGICAL, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY27 reports
- Arthrex® AR-8500FOTArthrex, Inc. · BUR, SURGICAL, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY17 reports
- Arthrex® AR-8150PX-45Arthrex, Inc. · BUR, SURGICAL, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY15 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page