CONMED V190-127-05Recalls & reported problems
Conmed Corporation · OSCILLATING SAW BLADE 19 X 1.27 X 105 MM · Class 1
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10845854021446), received between Apr 5, 2023 and Apr 5, 2023 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Fragmentation” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Fragmentation1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryApr 5, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER THAT THE V190-127-05 OSCILLATING SAW BLADE 19 X 1.27 X 105MM QTY 5 WAS BEING USED ON (B)(6) 2023 DURING A TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE AND ¿THE CUTTING EDGE OF THE BLADE WAS DAMAGED DURING THE FIRST FEMORAL CUT (NEW PACKAGING - ONE CUT).¿ AFTER FURTHER ASSESSMENT IT WAS FOUND THE BLADE DID FRAGMENT (THE LATERAL TOOTH BROKE OFF) AND THE "NURSES DISCOVERED THE SITUATION AT THE END OF THE SURGERY (PATIENT SKIN ALREADY CLOSED). THEY DIDN¿T FIND THE BLADE PIECE, THEY INFORMED THE SURGEON WHO DECIDED TO NO TAKE OTHER ACTIONS." IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE FRAGMENT FELL INTO THE SURGICAL SITE, "THEY ARE NOT SURE BECAUSE THEY DIDN¿T FIND THE FRAGMENTED PIECE ANYMORE. PROBABLY IT FELL OUTSIDE THE SURGICAL SITE, BUT THEY DIDN'T GIVE ME A DEFINITIVE ANSWER. THEY DIDN'T DO RX CONTROL." THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AND THERE WAS NO DELAY. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED AS "OK" AND THERE WAS NO MEDICAL/SURGICAL INTERVENTION OR PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION REQUIRED. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED ON THE BASIS OF INJURY DUE TO FRAGMENTATION, ALTHOUGH THEY ARE NOT CERTAIN IT FELL INTO THE SURGICAL SITE, THEY CANNOT PRODUCE THE PIECE AND ITS LOCATION IS UNKN
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 16683997 ↗
Other BLADE, SAW, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY, SURGICAL devices
- NA 511.801Synthes GmbH · BLADE, SAW, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY, SURGICAL223 reports
- Formula 0375544000Stryker Corporation · BLADE, SAW, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY, SURGICAL98 reports
- NA 0277096325Stryker Corporation · BLADE, SAW, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY, SURGICAL95 reports
- NA 310.25Synthes GmbH · BLADE, SAW, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY, SURGICAL91 reports
- Arthrex® AR-8400TDArthrex, Inc. · BLADE, SAW, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY, SURGICAL86 reports
- NA 0277096275Stryker Corporation · BLADE, SAW, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY, SURGICAL72 reports
- Arthrex® AR-7300DSArthrex, Inc. · BLADE, SAW, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY, SURGICAL70 reports
- NA 0277096277Stryker Corporation · BLADE, SAW, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY, SURGICAL69 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page