ORBIT GALAXY ENPOWER XTRASOFT 641HX0204Recalls & reported problems
Medos International Sàrl · ORBIT GALAXY G2 microcoil Stretch Resistant Helical XTRASOFT Coil 2mm x 4cm 190cm Contents: 1 Detachable Coil System Coil Type: Stretch Resistant Helical XTRASOFT Coil · Class 2 · Implant
All models of ORBIT GALAXY ENPOWER XTRASOFT (15)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10878528009396), received between Apr 3, 2017 and Dec 23, 2019 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Separation” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Premature Separation2
- Material Twisted/Bent1
- Stretched1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 23, 2019Premature Separation; Premature Separation
THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE COIL INTRODUCER ON THE 2MM X 4CM G2 HELICAL XTRASOFT COIL (641HX0204 / LOT# UNK) WAS CRACKED AND MADE IT DIFFICULTY TO PULL OUT FROM THE LOCK. THE COIL WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THE REPORTED ISSUE RESULTED IN A 10-MINUTE DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ANY PATIENT ADVERSE EVENT OR COMPLICATION. MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO THE PROCEDURE AND THE REPORTED DEVICE ISSUE WERE UNSUCCESSFUL. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS RECEIVED AT A LATER DATE, THIS FILE WILL BE UPDATED ACCORDINGLY. THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR EVALUATION WITHOUT THE EMBOLIC COIL. DURING THE PRODUCT INVESTIGATION, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE EMBOLIC COIL WAS MECHANICALLY DETACHED FROM THE DELIVERY SYSTEM AS THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE THAT THE DETACHMENT CYCLE WAS INITIATED BASED ON THE APPEARANCE OF THE RESISTANCE HEATING (RH) COIL. BASED ON THE PRODUCT ANALYSIS COMPLETED ON 10/30/2019, THIS EVENT HAS BEEN DEEMED MDR REPORTABLE AS A ¿MALFUNCTION.¿
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9513260 ↗MalfunctionAug 20, 2018Material Twisted/Bent; Premature Separation; Material Twisted/Bent; Premature Separation
AS REPORTED BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, DURING A COIL EMBOLIZATION OF A BASILAR TIP ARTERY ANEURYSM, THE 2MM X 4CM G2 HELICAL XTRASOFT (641HX0204/S13639) THERMO-MECHANICAL COIL DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS ADVANCED THROUGH THE BODY/SHAFT OF THE ECHELON (MEDTRONIC) MICROCATHETER, BUT RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED, AND THE COIL DELIVERY SYSTEM COULD NOT BE ADVANCED. THE COIL WAS REMOVED FROM THE MICROCATHETER; HOWEVER, UPON RETRIEVAL OF THE COIL, THE USER NOTED THAT THE COIL HAD DETACHED INSIDE OF THE MICROCATHETER HUB. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS OCCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT. PRIOR TO THIS COIL, THREE COILS WERE ADVANCED THROUGH THE SAME MICROCATHETER WITHOUT RESISTANCE. THE COIL DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS PREPPED WITHOUT ANY DIFFICULTY. THE USER DID NOT FASTEN THE ROTATING HEMOSTATIC VALVE (RHV) TOO TIGHTLY AROUND THE INTRODUCER. THE USER CONTINUOUSLY VERIFIED THAT THE INTRODUCER TIP AND THE MICROCATHETER HUB REMAINED ALIGNED. AN ADEQUATE CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS MAINTAINED THROUGH THE MICROCATHETER. WHEN THE UNUSUAL FRICTION OCCURRED DURING ADVANCEMENT, THE USER VERIFIED THAT THE FLUSH LINES WERE OPEN AND PROPERLY PRESSURIZED. NO ADDITIONAL DAMAGE WAS NOTED TO THE EMBOLIC COIL. THE USER DID NOT APPL
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7797578 ↗MalfunctionApr 3, 2017Stretched; Stretched
AS REPORTED BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, DURING EMBOLIZATION OF A MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY ANEURYSM, THERE WERE ISSUES WITH THREE DIFFERENT COILS, AND A PROWLER LPES. DELTAXSFT (DLX100206/C41704) WOULD NOT TAKE THE PROPER SHAPE PROPER SHAPE IN THE ANEURYSM (DID NOT TAKE THE PATH TO THE OPEN AREA OF THE ANEURYSM). THE POSITION OF THE MICROCATHETER WAS BELIEVED TO HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE COIL PERFORMANCE. THE COIL WAS REMOVED, RESHEATHED AND PUT ON BACK TABLE. WE THEN ATTEMPTED TO USE THE COIL AT A LATER TIME, IT WAS HYDRATED PER IFU, AND THE COIL WOULD NOT ADVANCE OUT OF THE SHEATH. THE COIL DID NOT APPEAR DAMAGED. A DELTAXSFT (DLX100256/C41706), LIKE THE PREVIOUS COIL, DID NOT CONFORM THE WAY THE PHYSICIAN WANTED, AND THE POSITION OF THE MICROCATHETER WAS FELT TO HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE POSITIONING ISSUE. THE COIL WAS REMOVED FOR RESHEATHING, BUT THE SHEATH SPLIT OPEN. THE COIL DID NOT APPEAR DAMAGED DURING THE PROCEDURE. NEXT, A G2 ORBIT GALAXY (641HX0204/C25452) WAS INTRODUCED INTO THE MICROCATHETER AND ADVANCED, BUT IT APPEARED THAT THE ENVOY DA GUIDE CATHETER (67125695DB/LOT UNK) SEEMED TO PINCH THE END OF THE PROWLER LPES MICROCATHETER (606S155FX/LOT UNK), AND THE G2 ORBIT GALA
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6453287 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page