Skip to content

Prelude PRO™ 10884450330323Recalls & reported problems

Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884450330323), received between Mar 23, 2022 and Mar 23, 2022 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture2
  • Material Separation2

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 23, 2022Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT THE DILATOR SEPARATED INSIDE THE PATIENT AFTER INSERTION. THE PATIENT WAS SENT TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM WHERE CT SCAN REVEALED THE DILATOR WAS LOCATED NEAR THE FEMORO-ILLIAC VEIN JUNCTURE AND WILL HAVE A PROCEDURE TO HAVE IT REMOVED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 13862683 ↗
  • InjuryMar 23, 2022Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT WHILE GAINING SHEATH ACCESS FOR AN RF ABLATION PROCEDURE OF THE GSV, THE INTRODUCER HUB DETACHED WITHIN THE 7F ACCESS SHEATH. THE ATTENDING CLINICIAN AND STAFF DID NOT RECOGNIZE THAT THE INTRODUCER HAD DETACHED FROM THE HUB WHILE REMOVING THE ACCESS WIRE AND INTRODUCER TOGETHER AS THE LAST STEP OF THE SELDINGER ACCESS TECHNIQUE. WHEN THE CLINICIAN WAS INTRODUCING THE RF ABLATION CATHETER THROUGH THE ACCESS SHEATH, THEY INADVERTENTLY INTRODUCED THE FOREIGN BODY INTO THE PATIENT'S ILIAC VEIN. THE CLINICIAN COULD NOT IDENTIFY THE FOREIGN BODY VIA US. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER FACILITY FOR BETTER IMAGING WHERE THE LOCATION OF THE FOREIGN BODY WAS CONFIRMED. VASCULAR SURGERY WAS THEN CONSULTED, AND THE FOREIGN BODY SUCCESSFULLY EXTRACTED VIA SURGICAL TECHNIQUE THUS LIBERATING THE NEEDED VASCULAR CONDUIT FOR THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 13862525 ↗

Other DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION devices

All DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page