Monoject 8881247111Recalls & reported problems
Cardinal Health, Inc. · Bone Marrow Biopsy / Aspiration Needle,J-Type · Class 1
All models of Monoject (164)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521020498), received between Feb 14, 2018 and Mar 15, 2023 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 15, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
DURING THE MESC COLLECTION PROCEDURE, THE ASPIRATE NEEDLE WAS INSERTED BY THE OPERATOR AT THE LEVEL OF THE RIGHT POSTERIOR ILIAC CREST, IN ORDER TO PROCEED WITH BONE MARROW BLOOD ASPIRATION. SUBSEQUENTLY, WHEN THE OPERATOR WAS WITHDRAWING THE NEEDLE, THE HANDLE OF THE DEVICE DISENGAGED FROM THE NEEDLE AND REMAINED STUCK IN THE THICKNESS OF THE BONE. IN A FEW MINUTES, USING KLEMMER FORCEPS, IT WAS POSSIBLE TO REMOVE THE NEEDLE FROM THE BONE SEAT, AND CONTINUE WITH THE COLLECTION PROCEDURE USING OTHER NEEDLES FROM THE SAME BATCH, WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENTS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16545790 ↗MalfunctionFeb 14, 2018Break; Break
THE CUSTOMER REPORTS THE HANDLE ON ONE OF THE NEEDLES BROKE AND THE SECOND NEEDLE BENT DURING THE BONE MARROW ASPIRATION.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7270146 ↗
Other NEEDLE, ASPIRATION AND INJECTION, DISPOSABLE devices
- N/A 305211Becton, Dickinson And Company · NEEDLE, ASPIRATION AND INJECTION, DISPOSABLE425 reports
- N/A 305180Becton, Dickinson And Company · NEEDLE, ASPIRATION AND INJECTION, DISPOSABLE300 reports
- N/A 305200Becton, Dickinson And Company · NEEDLE, ASPIRATION AND INJECTION, DISPOSABLE99 reports
- PneumoDart TM-317TyTek Medical Inc. · Needle, Aspiration And Injection, Disposable1 recall1 report
- TPAK TM-303TyTek Medical Inc. · Needle, Aspiration And Injection, Disposable1 recall0 reports
- N/A 305181Becton, Dickinson And Company · NEEDLE, ASPIRATION AND INJECTION, DISPOSABLE32 reports
- SOL-M™ Blunt Fill Needle with 5 Micron Filter 110022Sol-Millennium Medical, Inc. · Needle, Aspiration And Injection, Disposable17 reports
- CONFIDENCE SPINAL CEMENT SYSTEM 283903611Medos International Sàrl · NEEDLE, ASPIRATION AND INJECTION, DISPOSABLE17 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page