Skip to content

Oridion N85Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Portable Bedside Capnograph/Pulse Oximeter · Class 2

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
1
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521172043), received between Nov 21, 2018 and Nov 21, 2024 — classified as 1 death, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Damaged Prior to Use” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Device Damaged Prior to Use1
  • Failure to Calibrate1
  • High Readings1
  • Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1
  • Temperature Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Death1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 21, 2024Failure to Calibrate; High Readings; Failure to Calibrate; High Readings

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE DEVICE WAS UNABLE TO CALIBRATE AND GAVE A HIGH READINGS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20754167 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 10, 2022Temperature Problem; Temperature Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, PRIOR TO USE, THE UNIT BECAME HOT WHEN POWERED ON. THE DEVICE WAS POWER CYCLED FOR TROUBLESHOOTING. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15201567 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 14, 2022Device Damaged Prior to Use; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Device Damaged Prior to Use; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, PRIOR TO USE, THE UNIT HAD A CRACK CASE NEAR TO POWER SWITCH AND PSU CABLE LOW VOLTAGE SIDE LOCKING TAB WAS BROKEN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13260611 ↗
  • DeathMar 13, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE DEVICE WAS CAUGHT ON FIRE WHICH ALLEGEDLY CAUSED BY THE DEFIBRILLATOR. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS NOT POWERED ON AND WAS NOT CONNECTED TO THE PATIENT. THE DEVICE WAS BURNED/MELTED DUE TO FIRE FROM ELECTRICAL ENERGY ARC FROM DEFIBRILLATOR PAD AND HIGH FLOW OXYGEN FROM NASAL CANNULA IN PATIENT'S BED. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD BURNS TO HEAD, NECK, FACE, EARS AND SHOULDERS DUE TO THE FIRE AND DIED DUE TO CARDIAC ARREST. THE CAUSE OF DEATH WAS NOT RELATED TO DEVICE.

    Patient problems: Death

    MAUDE report 8416857 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 21, 2018Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE UNIT WAS NOT REALLY USED ON A PATIENT. THERE WAS A CODE BLUE ON A PATIENT, THEY WERE GOING TO USE THIS UNIT ON THE PATIENT TO CHECK SPO2 AND CO2. BUT WHEN THE UNIT WAS TURNED ON, IT WAS RED AND DID NOT GIVE ANY KIND OF READINGS AT ALL.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8095641 ↗

Other Analyzer, Gas, Carbon-Dioxide, Gaseous-Phase devices

All Analyzer, Gas, Carbon-Dioxide, Gaseous-Phase devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page