Arcpoint ILS-2100-PN (UDI 10884521723610)Recalls & reported problems
Covidien LP · pulmonary needle · Class 2
All models of Arcpoint (4)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521723610), received between Jan 28, 2020 and Dec 8, 2023 — classified as 6 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem6
- Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
- Break1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
Patient problems
- Pneumothorax6
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding2
- Insufficient Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryDec 8, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT HAD PNEUMOTHORAX MID PROCEDURE. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE BIOPSY NEEDLE PUNCTURED THE PLEURA. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, A CHEST TUBE WAS PLACED. THE PHYSICIAN WAS STILL ABLE TO COMPLETE THE ELECTROMAGNETIC NAVIGATIONAL BRONCHOSCOPY (ENB) PORTION OF THE CASE. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT'S HOSPITALIZATION WAS EXTENDED.
Patient problems: Pneumothorax
MAUDE report 18294230 ↗InjuryApr 14, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
ACCORDING TO LITERATURE SOURCE OF COHORT STUDY, IN THE FIRST SIX MONTHS, THE AUTHORS COMPARED THE DIAGNOTIC YIELD OF TWO PLATFORMS, DIGITAL TOMOSYNTHESIS-ELECTROMAGNETIC NAVIGATIONAL BRONCHOSCOPY (DT-ENB) AND SHAPE-SENSING ROBOTIC-ASSISTED BRONCHOSCOPY (SSRAB). SSRAB WAS USED TO BIOPSY 143 PPLS IN 133 PATIENTS AND DT-ENB WAS USED TO BIOPSY 197 PPLS IN 170 PATIENTS. TRANSBRONCHIAL NEEDLE ASPIRATION WAS THE Q9 INITIAL BIOPSY METHOD IN ALL PATIENTS USING THE 21-GAUGE PULMONARY NEEDLE IN DT-ENB PROCEDURES AND 19-GAUGE, 21-GAUGE, OR 23-GAUGE NEEDLES FROM ANOTHER MANUFACTURER IN SSRAB PROCEDURES. POST OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS WAS PNEUMOTHORAX ON TWO (2) PATIENTS (1.5%) OF SSRAB AND ON THREE PATIENTS (1.8%) OF DT-ENB. ONE PATIENT (0.6%) IN THE DTENB GROUP AND 2 PATIENTS (1.5%) IN THE SSRAB GROUP REQUIRED TUBE THORACOSTOMY. NO PATIENTS REQUIRED ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION BECAUSE OF BLEEDING IN EITHER COHORT.
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Insufficient Information; Pneumothorax
MAUDE report 16746938 ↗InjuryApr 14, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ACCORDING TO THE LITERATURE SOURCE, THE STUDY WAS ABOUT THE EXPERIENCE OF ULTRATHIN PROBE TRANSBRONCHIAL LUNG CRYOBIOPSY (UP-TBLC) VIA THE MONARCH ROBOTIC-ASSISTED BRONCHOSCOPY (RAB) SYSTEM FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF PPLS WITH PRIMARY ENDPOINTS OF SAFETY AND FEASIBILITY. THIS WAS A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF 58 LESIONS IN 53 PATIENTS THAT UNDERWENT RAB WITH RADIAL PROBE ENDOBRONCHIAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY (RP-EBUS) GUIDED UP-TBLC, COMPLIMENTING TRADITIONAL SAMPLING METHODS OF PPLS DURING SINGLE USER¿S FIRST ADOPTION OF RAB BETWEEN (B)(6) 2022 AND (B)(6) 2022. UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA VIA AN ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE, MONARCH, RAB WITH RP-EBUS LESION CONFIRMATION WAS PERFORMED. TISSUE ACQUISITION WAS OBTAINED FOR ALL LESIONS IN THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE: 21 GAUGE NEEDLE BIOPSY AND 15G BIOPSY CORING TOOL ASPIRATIONS, 1.1 MM UP-TBLC, FORCEPS BIOPSY AND BRONCHOALVEOLAR LAVAGE (BAL). THREE INCIDENTS OF PNEUMOTHORAX (5%) OCCURRED. ALL REQUIRED INTERVENTIONS. ONE WAS DISCHARGED ON THE SAME DAY WITHOUT SMALL BORE CHEST TUBE (SBCT) AFTER SUCCESSFUL MANUAL ASPIRATION, ONE DISCHARGED WITH SBCT FOR AMBULATORY MANAGEMENT AND ONE HOSPITALIZED WITH SBCT AFTER FAILING MANUAL ASPIRATION. BOTH CHEST TUBES WERE REMOVED WITHIN
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Pneumothorax
MAUDE report 16746827 ↗InjuryJul 1, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DEVICES HAD NO DEFECTS AND THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PNEUMOTHORAX AND HAD TO USED CHEST TUBE. THE EVENT HAS LEAD TO OR EXTEND PATIENT HOSPITALIZATION.
Patient problems: Pneumothorax
MAUDE report 14887649 ↗InjuryApr 13, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT HAD A PNEUMOTHORAX. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, A CHEST TUBE WAS USED AND THE PATIENT WAS HOSPITALIZED. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO COMPLETE THE ELECTROMAGNETIC NAVIGATIONAL BRONCHOSCOPY (ENB) PORTION OF THE CASE. THE PATIENT HAD AN EXTENDED PATIENT HOSPITALIZATION AS WELL.
Patient problems: Pneumothorax
MAUDE report 14103168 ↗InjuryJan 28, 2020Break; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Break; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE BROKE AT THE PROXIMAL END WHEN THE TECH PULLED THE NEEDLE BACK INTO THE SHAFT. THE WHITE SEPARATED FROM THE BLUE END OF THE DEVICE. THE TECH DID PULL VERY HARD ON THE DEVICE TO PULL THE NEEDLE BACK INTO THE SHAFT. THE PATIENT HAD PNEUMOTHORAX, BUT THE PHYSICIAN BELIEVED THAT THE EXTREME MOVEMENT OF THE PATIENT'S COUGHING DURING THE CASE CAUSED THE PNEUMOTHORAX, AND WAS NOT CAUSED BY THE NEEDLE BROKEN HANDLE. THE PATIENT HAD TO SPEND THE NIGHT AT THE HOSPITAL.
Patient problems: Pneumothorax
MAUDE report 9638876 ↗
Other BRONCHOSCOPE (FLEXIBLE OR RIGID) devices
- EVIS EXERA III BRONCHOVIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS BF-1TH190Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · BRONCHOSCOPE (FLEXIBLE OR RIGID)3 recalls5 deaths1,557 reports
- EVIS EXERA III BRONCHOVIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS BF-H190Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · BRONCHOSCOPE (FLEXIBLE OR RIGID)4 recalls1 death1,214 reports
- EVIS EXERA III BRONCHOVIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS BF-XP190Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · BRONCHOSCOPE (FLEXIBLE OR RIGID)4 recalls1,146 reports
- Ion 380748Intuitive Surgical, Inc. · Bronchoscope (flexible or rigid)1 recall97 deaths1,278 reports
- VISERA ELITE XENON LIGHT SOURCE OLYMPUS CLV-S190Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · BRONCHOSCOPE (FLEXIBLE OR RIGID)1,155 reports
- EVIS EXERA III BRONCHOVIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS BF-P190Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · BRONCHOSCOPE (FLEXIBLE OR RIGID)5 recalls3 deaths621 reports
- EVIS EXERA III BRONCHOVIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS BF-1TH190Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Bronchoscope (Flexible Or Rigid)3 recalls333 reports
- BRONCHOVIDEOSCOPE BF-1T150Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · BRONCHOSCOPE (FLEXIBLE OR RIGID)4 recalls212 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page