Skip to content

Arcpoint ILS-1800-PN (UDI 10884521809499)Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Pulmonary Needle · Class 2

All models of Arcpoint (4)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521809499), received between Sep 30, 2022 and Sep 23, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Separation2

Patient problems

  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Unintended Radiation Exposure1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 23, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE BROKE OFF INSIDE THE PATIENT. IT WAS LOOSE IN THE PATIENT AND WAS REMOVED WITH FORCEPS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20287260 ↗
  • InjurySep 30, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A ROBOT NAVIGATIONAL BRONCHOSCOPY FNA'S (FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATIONS) WERE BEING OBTAINED FROM A PULMONARY LESION. THE TIP, NEEDLE PORTION, OF THE 18G PULMONARY NEEDLE BROKE FREE FROM THE REST OF THE NEEDLE AND REMAINED IN THE LUNG. IT IS ROUGHLY 3/8 INCHES LONG AND WAS IMMEDIATELY VISUALIZED UNDER FLUOROSCOPY. THE DOCTORS MENTIONED  A POP WAS FELT WHILE DOING THE BIOPSY WHEN THE NEEDLE SEPARATED.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; Foreign Body In Patient; Unintended Radiation Exposure

    MAUDE report 15519888 ↗

Other Bronchoscope (flexible or rigid) devices

All Bronchoscope (flexible or rigid) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page