Skip to content

superDimension SDAN2000 (UDI 10884521843202)Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Pre-marked Aspirating Needle · Class 1

All models of superDimension (20)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521843202), received between Apr 1, 2024 and Apr 4, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Application Network Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 2 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Application Network Problem1
  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
  • Positioning Failure1

Patient problems

  • Pneumothorax2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 4, 2024Positioning Failure; Application Network Problem; Positioning Failure; Application Network Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PROCEDURE, THE TWO NEEDLES HAD DIFFICULTY DEPLOYING, AND DID NOT GET ANY TISSUE SAMPLE. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE NODULE CHARACTERISTICS (HARD TISSUE) OR WERE NOT IN THE CORRECT SPOT FOR DEPLOYMENT. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO COMPLETE THE ELECTROMAGNETIC NAVIGATIONAL BRONCHOSCOPY (ENB) PORTION OF THE CASE. HOWEVER, AFTER THE PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT HAD PNEUMOTHORAX WHICH RESULTED IN EXTENDED HOSPITALIZATION. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, A CHEST TUBE WAS USED.

    Patient problems: Pneumothorax

    MAUDE report 19047949 ↗
  • InjuryApr 1, 2024Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PROCEDURE, THE TWO NEEDLES HAD DIFFICULTY DEPLOYING, AND DID NOT GET ANY TISSUE SAMPLE. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE NODULE CHARACTERISTICS (HARD TISSUE) OR WERE NOT IN THE CORRECT SPOT FOR DEPLOYMENT. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO COMPLETE THE ELECTROMAGNETIC NAVIGATIONAL BRONCHOSCOPY (ENB) PORTION OF THE CASE. HOWEVER, AFTER THE PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT HAD PNEUMOTHORAX. REPORT 2 OF 2.

    Patient problems: Pneumothorax

    MAUDE report 19011047 ↗

Other NEEDLE, ASPIRATION AND INJECTION, DISPOSABLE devices

All NEEDLE, ASPIRATION AND INJECTION, DISPOSABLE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page