CARDINAL HEALTH SU130-1308Recalls & reported problems
Cardinal Health 200, LLC · DRAIN JACKSONPRATT FL7MM3/4 PE · Class 1
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885380064005), received between Jul 25, 2018 and Dec 17, 2018 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
- Difficult to Remove1
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
- Discomfort1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 17, 2018Fracture; Difficult to Remove
DURING SURGERY FOR REMOVAL OF INSTRUMENTATION, FACET FUSION, TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTER BODY FUSION L3-S1, THE SURGEON PLACED TWO FLAT 7MM JACKSON PRATT DRAINS. ONE WAS PLACED ON THE LEFT AND ONE ON THE RIGHT THROUGH SEPARATE STAB INCISIONS. MUSCLE AND FASCIA WERE APPROXIMATED USING INTERRUPTED VICRYL SUTURES. SKIN STAPLES AND SKIN GLUE WERE USED TO APPROXIMATE THE SKIN. THE NEXT DAY, THE SURGEON REMOVED THE LEFT DRAIN WITHOUT RESISTANCE AND IT WAS NOTED TO BE INTACT. DURING REMOVAL OF THE RIGHT DRAIN THE SURGEON NOTED THAT THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE, BUT THAT THE DRAIN WAS TEARING AT ONE OF THE PERFORATIONS. THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO GRAB THE DRAIN PIECE THAT WAS TEARING WITH A HEMOSTAT TO ENSURE ENTIRE REMOVAL, BUT THIS WAS TO UNCOMFORTABLE FOR THE PATIENT. A DECISION WAS MADE TO CUT THE DRAIN AND RETURN THE PATIENT FOR SURGICAL REMOVAL OF THE RETAINED DRAIN PIECE. THE PATIENT WAS BROUGHT BACK TO SURGERY WHERE THE INCISION WAS RE-OPENED AND THE ENTIRE DRAIN WAS REMOVED AND EXAMINED. THERE WAS AN OBVIOUS FRACTURE THROUGH THE PERFORATION AT THE PROXIMAL END OF THE DRAIN. THE PATIENT RECOVERED WITHOUT INCIDENT. NO PERMANENT HARM TO THE PATIENT. THE SURGEON IMMEDIATELY STOPPED USING THE
Patient problems: Discomfort
MAUDE report 8170882 ↗MalfunctionJul 25, 2018Break
THE DRAIN BROKE WHILE IT WAS BEING REMOVED AND A FOLLOW-UP X-RAY REVEALED A 4CM PIECE OF RESIDUAL DRAIN CATHETER REMAINED IN THE RIGHT SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE. THE EXTERNAL PORTION OF THE DRAIN WAS DISCARDED. AS OF (B)(6) 2018 THE BROKEN PIECE REMAINS IN THE PATIENT, AND OVERALL THE PATIENT IS DOING WELL. AN ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE WILL BE NEEDED TO REMOVE THE BROKEN PIECE LATER.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 7721121 ↗
Other CATHETER, IRRIGATION devices
- Navarre Opti-Drain NOD8LPTBard Access Systems, Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION901 reports
- Navarre NNU8LPTBard Access Systems, Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION736 reports
- BLAKE 2227Ethicon Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION331 reports
- Navarre NNU6LPTBard Access Systems, Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION211 reports
- Navarre Opti-Drain NOD10LPTBard Access Systems, Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION178 reports
- Navarre NNU10LPTBard Access Systems, Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION127 reports
- BLAKE 2233Ethicon Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION114 reports
- Vasoshield VH-5001Maquet Cardiovascular LLC · Catheter, Irrigation1 recall27 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page