CARDINAL HEALTH SU130-1310 (UDI 10885380064029)Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885380064029), received between Jun 13, 2017 and Feb 13, 2020 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• MalfunctionFeb 13, 2020Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component

  CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT WHILE REMOVING A JACKSON PRATT DRAIN IN ORDER TO PLACE A PICO DRESSING ON PATIENT¿S RIGHT KNEE, THE DRAIN PARTIALLY BROKE OFF INSIDE OF THE PATIENT¿S KNEE. THERE WAS REPORTEDLY LITTLE RESISTANCE WITH REMOVAL OF DRAIN. PATIENT WAS TAKEN BACK TO THE OR TO ENSURE BROKEN PIECES WERE REMOVED.

  Patient problems: No Code Available

  MAUDE report 9708502 ↗
• MalfunctionJun 23, 2018Break; Detachment Of Device Component

  PATIENT CAME POST-OP WITH JP IN "BACK" INCISION. NURSING ATTEMPTED TO DISCONNECT DRAIN WHEN ORDERED. NURSE REPORTED USING USUAL METHOD OF REMOVAL AND FEELING NO UNUSUAL AMOUNT OF RESISTANCE. DRAIN BROKE OFF AT INSERTION SITE AND SURGEON HAD TO OPEN INCISION TO REMOVE REST OF DRAIN MANUALLY.

  Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

  MAUDE report 7632453 ↗
• InjuryJun 13, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  OUR CUSTOMER, (B)(6), RECEIVED A VOICEMAIL MESSAGES FROM AN ATTORNEY CALLING ON BEHALF OF A FEMALE PATIENT OF DR.(B)(6)'S OFFICE. HE INDICATED THE JACKSON PRATT 7MM FLAT DRAIN FULL PERF CATALOG NUMBER SU130-1310 WAS USED ON HIS CLIENT PRIOR TO THE PRODUCT BEING RECALLED AND THE PATIENT WAS INFECTED AND HAD SPENT FOUR DAYS IN THE HOSPITAL. BEYOND THAT, HE IS NOT CERTAIN WHAT OTHER PERMANENT INJURIES THERE MAY BE. THE DATE OF INCIDENT AND PATIENT'S AGE WAS NOT PROVIDED. THIS IS ALL THE INFORMATION WE HAVE AT THIS TIME RELATED TO THIS EVENT.

  Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 6638734 ↗