Skip to content

Alaris C20022Recalls & reported problems

BD Switzerland Sàrl · Extension Set, 51 cm (20 in) · Class 2

All models of Alaris (85)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885403235498), received between Aug 28, 2020 and Sep 28, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult or Delayed Separation” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult or Delayed Separation1
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Leak/Splash1
  • Problem with Sterilization1

Patient problems

  • Missed Dose1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 28, 2026Problem with Sterilization

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50924401 ↗
  • InjurySep 2, 2020Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT 20 INCH EXT SET BROKE OFF IN THE LUMEN OF THE PICC LINE. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER: MATERIAL NO: C20022, BATCH NO: 20056787. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TIP OF THE TUBING BROKE OFF IN THE LUMEN DUE TO DIFFICULTY REMOVING EXTENSION SETS. CUSTOMER RESPONSE (B)(6) 2020: "THE MALE PIECE FROM THE EXTENSION TUBING BROKE OFF IN THE PICC LINE. PLEASE SEE MY RESPONSES TO YOUR QUESTIONS BELOW. ADDITIONALLY PLEASE ADVISE ON THE ADDITIONAL INQUIRY REGARDING THE ADVERSE EVENT: COULD YOU PROVIDE CONFIRMATION THAT THE LINE WAS A CENTRAL LINE AND NOT A PERIPHERAL LINE? ADDITIONALLY, DID IT NEED TO BE REPLACED? THIS WAS A PICC LINE WHICH HAD TO BE REMOVED; WE PLACED A PERIPHERAL IV AS THE PATIENT¿S ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY WAS NOT COMPLETED. PT HAD 3 MORE DAYS OF ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY. BECAUSE THE MEDICATION REGIMEN WAS COMPLETED 3 DAYS EARLY, WERE ANY DOSES OF MEDICATION MISSED? THIS IS NOT ACCURATE. THE PATIENT¿S MEDICATION REGIMEN WAS NOT COMPLETE. PT HAD 3 MORE DAYS OF THERAPY." CUSTOMER RESPONSE (B)(6) 2020: ARE YOU ABLE TO PROVIDE A PART NO AND BATCH NO FOR THE REPORTED EXTENSION TUBING? REF (B)(4), LOT# (10)20056787. WAS THERE ANY ADVERSE EVENT(S

    Patient problems: Missed Dose

    MAUDE report 10486232 ↗
  • InjuryAug 28, 2020Difficult to Remove; Difficult or Delayed Separation; Difficult to Remove; Difficult or Delayed Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE 20 INCH EXT SET EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTY DISCONNECTING THE DEVICE WHICH CAUSED THE PICC TO BE REMOVED. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER: THE TUBING WAS PLACED DIRECTLY INTO A LUMEN OF A PICC AND NOT INTO THE NEEDLELESS CONNECTOR. CUSTOMER RESPONSE 25-AUG-2020: ¿ ARE YOU ABLE TO PROVIDE A PART NO AND BATCH NO FOR THE REPORTED EXTENSION TUBING? REF# (B)(4) LOT# (10)20056787; ¿ WAS THERE ANY ADVERSE EVENT(S) AS A RESULT OF THE REPORTED DEFECT? YES PT.¿S PICC LINE HAD TO BE REMOVED PREMATURELY.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 10468519 ↗

Other Set, administration, intravascular devices

All Set, administration, intravascular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page