Skip to content

Equinoxe 314-13-24Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Equinoxe (305)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
13
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
12
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 13 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862200983), received between Jan 22, 2020 and Jan 26, 2026 — classified as 12 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (7 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

7 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K113309); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Mar 6, 2024Open, Classified

    The packaging of these affected UHMWPE humeral liners and glenoids are nonconforming as they do not meet the established packaging specification. They were packaged in vacuum bags that did not contain an additional oxygen barrier layer consisting of Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol (EVOH).

    Z-1414-2024 · Root cause: Nonconforming Material/Component · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth7
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Fracture2
  • Mechanical Problem2
  • Naturally Worn2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Pain6
  • Failure of Implant4
  • Insufficient Information3
  • Implant Pain1
  • Joint Dislocation1
  • Joint Laxity1
  • Loss of Range of Motion1
  • Medical device site infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 13 most recent of 13 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 26, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INITIAL LEFT TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT THEY EXPERIENCE PAIN AND THAT THE POLYETHYLENE COMPONENT HAS DISASSOCIATED. NO MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 24185525 ↗
  • InjuryDec 1, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MALE PATIENT, WHO HAD A LEFT ANATOMIC SHOULDER REPLACEMENT, UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE APPROXIMATELY 3 YEARS 4 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT CONSULTED THE SURGEON REGARDING SHOULDER INSTABILITY DUE TO A SUBSCAPULARIS REPAIR FAILURE. REVISION SURGERY WAS PLANNED TO CHANGE THE ANATOMIC SHOULDER TO A REVERSE. DURING THE HUMERAL HEAD REMOVAL STEP, THE INSITU HUMERAL STEM CAME OUT. SUBSEQUENTLY A FULL REVISION WAS PERFORMED REPLACING ALL IMPLANTS. THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS FOR THE PATIENT. THERE WERE NO SURGICAL DELAYS OR DEVICE BREAKAGES DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO X-RAYS WERE ABLE TO BE OBTAINED. THE EXPLANTED DEVICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN AS THEY WERE DISCARDED. DEVICE IMAGES WERE PROVIDED. THE CAGE GLENOID WAS OBSERVED TO BE FRACTURED. TWO OF THE PEGS WERE BROKEN OFF THE MAIN CONSTRUCT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION. THIS IS 1 OF 2 REPORTS FOR THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity; Muscle/Tendon Damage

    MAUDE report 23688930 ↗
  • InjuryJun 27, 2025Naturally Worn; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Naturally Worn; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INITIAL LEFT TSA. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT REPORTED EXPERIENCING PAIN. AS A RESULT, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT THE FIRST STAGE OF A TWO-STAGE LEFT SHOULDER REVISION APPROXIMATELY 6 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS AFTER INITIAL IMPLANTATION. DURING THE PROCEDURE THE GLENOID COMPONENT WAS NOTED TO BE LOOSE AND WORN SIGNIFICANTLY. NO FURTHER PATIENT IMPACT REPORTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 22345952 ↗
  • InjuryMay 29, 2025Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS PATIENT'S LEFT SHOULDER WAS REVISED APPROXIMATELY 5 YEARS POST INITIAL OPERATION. REVISED FOR FAILED CAGE GLENOID. NO FURTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED AT THIS TIME. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 22106461 ↗
  • InjuryOct 14, 2024Fracture; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Fracture; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    APPROXIMATELY 3 MONTH(S) AND 10 DAY(S) POST-OPERATIVE OF A LEFT TSA, IT WAS REPORTED VIA CLINICAL STUDY THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BREAKAGE OF A COMPONENT. PATIENT WOKE UP WITH A POSTERIOR DISLOCATION WHICH SPONTANEOUSLY RELOCATED. DECISION TAKEN TO PERFORM A REVISION. PLASTIC GLENOID PLATE FOUND TO HAVE SHEARED OFF UNDERLYING METAL PINS AND BE FREE FLOATING IN JOINT. IN AN EARLIER REPORTED EVENT, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED INSTABILITY/SUBLUXATION INTRA-OPERATIVELY AND ONCE SHOULDER LOCATED CORRECTLY, PLACED IN SHOULDER IMMOBILIZER SLING WITH WEDGE FOR 3 WEEKS IN NEUTRAL ROTATION. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A STANDARD TOTAL WITH STEMLESS REVISION WITH THE REPORTED REMOVAL OF THE GLENOID, STEMLESS HUMERAL HEAD, AND STEMLESS HUMERAL CAGE. THE OUTCOME OF THIS EVENT IS CONSIDERED RESOLVED AND THE CLINICAL REPORT INDICATES THAT THIS EVENT IS DEFINITELY RELATED TO THE DEVICE(S) AND POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 20444636 ↗
  • InjurySep 9, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Naturally Worn; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS 61 Y/O MALE PATIENT WAS REVISED APPROXIMATELY 3 YEARS 3 MONTHS POST OP. PATIENT COMPLAINED OF PAIN. POLY SHEERED OFF FROM THE PEGS. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. PRODUCT NOT RETURNING: CHAIN OF COMMAND DUE TO RECALL HOSPITAL WILL NOT RELEASE.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 20177415 ↗
  • InjuryJul 9, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    APPROXIMATELY 1 YEAR(S), 11 MONTH(S) AND 6 DAY(S) POST-OPERATIVE OF A LEFT TSA, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH ASEPTIC GLENOID LOOSENING. IT WAS DESCRIBED AS LOOSENING OF GLENOID COMPONENT AND PAINFUL HARDWARE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A STANDARD TOTAL WITH PRESERVE STEM REVISION SURGERY. THE OUTCOME OF THIS EVENT IS STILL CONSIDERED CONTINUING. THE CLINICAL REPORT INDICATES THAT THIS EVENT IS POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE DEVICE(S) AND DEFINITELY RELATED TO THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 19703752 ↗
  • InjuryApr 29, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT A PATIENT HAD A RIGHT TOTAL SHOULDER REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2017 AND THEN WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2024. PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY FOR ISSUES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO COMPONENT LOOSENING. BOTH THE HUMERAL STEM AND ANATOMIC CAGE GLENOID COMPONENTS WERE LOOSE. THE COMPONENTS WERE REMOVED AND THE SURGEON IMPLANTED COMPETITOR IMPLANTS. THERE WAS NO REPORTED BREAKAGE OF A DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19209072 ↗
  • InjuryJan 8, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AS REPORTED BY THE EQUINOXE SHOULDER STUDY, THE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL LEFT TSA ON (B)(6) 2017 AND PRESENTED ON 12-NOV-2019 WITH ASEPTIC GLENOID LOOSENING. GLENOID LOOSENING AND HUMERAL BONE LOSS. THE CASE REPORT FORM INDICATES THAT THIS EVENT IS POSSIBLY RELATED TO DEVICE AND DEFINITELY RELATED TO PROCEDURE. OUTCOME IS RESOLVED BY REVISION ON 18-DEC-2019. SPACER - HUGE BONE LOSS. NO DEVICE RETURN ANTICIPATED DUE TO BEING A CLINICAL TRIAL STUDY. EBI INITIAL SURGERY ATTACHED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 18465133 ↗
  • InjuryAug 23, 2023Mechanical Problem; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Mechanical Problem; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA A CLINICAL EQUINOXE SHOULDER STUDY, THAT A 66 YO MALE PATIENT, WHO HAD AN INITIAL LEFT SHOULDER IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2018, DEVELOPED WORSENING SHOULDER PAIN W/OUT INCITING AN EVENT ON AN UNKNOWN DATE IN 2022. X-RAYS DEMONSTRATE GLENOID LOOSENING AND OSTEOLYSIS AROUND STEMLESS COMPONENT. THE PATIENT HAD A SUBACROMIAL CORTICOSTEROID INJECTION. RELATIVE REST, ACTIVITY MODIFICATION, AND NSAIDS WERE PRESCRIBED. OUTCOME IS CONTINUING. THE PATIENT IS CONSIDERING REVISION SURGERY. THE STUDY INDICATES THAT THIS IS DEFINITELY NOT RELATED TO THE DEVICES OR THE PROCEDURE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION KNOWN.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Loss of Range of Motion; Medical device site infection; Osteolysis; Pain

    MAUDE report 17608067 ↗
  • InjurySep 8, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL LEFT TSA ON (B)(6) 2020. THE PATIENT HAD A REVISION DUE TO UNKNOWN REASONS AND WAS REVISED TO ZIMMER BIOMET REVERSE. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO OTHER PATIENT INFORMATION/MEDICAL HISTORY PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15380007 ↗
  • InjuryAug 10, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    APPROXIMATELY 10 MONTHS POSTOP THE INITIAL L TSA, THE (B)(6) Y/O MALE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING PAIN AND DISCOMFORT IN L SHOULDER AND WAS CONVERTED FROM AN ANATOMIC TOTAL SHOULDER TO A REVERSE SHOULDER. ALL ANATOMIC COMPONENTS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE HUMERAL STEM, WERE EXPLANTED. THE STEM REMAINED INTACT AND A REVERSE SHOULDER WAS IMPLANTED USING THE CURRENT STEM. PT WAS REVISED TO A 42MM +4 OFFSET GLENOSPHERE, +0 ADAPTER TRAY, SUP/POST AUGMENTED BASEPLATE (LEFT) AND 42MM +0 HUMERAL LINER. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. DEVICES ARE NOT RETURNING DUE TO FACILITY POLICY.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 12303196 ↗
  • InjuryJan 22, 2020Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 2 YEARS POST-OP THE INITIAL TSA FOR THIS (B)(6) FEMALE, THE INITIAL REASON FOR REVISION WAS THOUGHT TO BE CUFF FAILURE BUT ONCE WE OPENED THE PATIENT UP IT WAS APPARENT THE GLENOID WAS LOOSE. THERE HAS BEEN CATASTROPHIC POSTERIOR WEAR OF THE COMPONENT WHICH HAS CREATED AN OSTEOLYTIC RESPONSE AND THEN LOOSENED THE IMPLANT. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. THE DEVICES WILL NOT BE RETURNED PER HOSPITAL POLICY. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 9617875 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K113309. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-1413-2024 · Mar 6, 2024 · Open, Classified
    Exactech Equinoxe CAGE GLENOID, CEMENTED, beta curvature, Mates with: a) 47, 50, 53 head, Medium, Item Number 314-13-13, b) 47, 50, 53 head, Large, Item Number 314-13-14, c) 47
  • Z-1412-2024 · Mar 6, 2024 · Open, Classified
    Exactech Equinoxe CAGE GLENOID, CEMENTED, alpha curvature, Mates with: a) 38, 41, 44 head, Small, Item Number 314-13-02, b) 38, 41, 44 head, Medium, Item Number 314-13-03, c) 3
  • Z-1415-2024 · Mar 6, 2024 · Open, Classified
    Exactech Equinoxe CAGE GLENOID,POSTERIOR AUGMENT, CEMENTED, Right, Mates with: a) 38, 41, 44, 47 head, Small, Item Number 314-13-32, b) 41, 44, 47, 50, head, Medium, Item Numbe
  • Z-0459-2021 · Oct 6, 2020 · Terminated
    Catalog 314-13-23, Equinoxe Cage Glenoid, Posterior Augment, Left, Medium
  • Z-0460-2021 · Oct 6, 2020 · Terminated
    Catalog 314-13-33, Equinoxe Cage Glenoid, Posterior Augment, Right, Medium
  • Z-0415-2018 · Aug 31, 2017 · Terminated
    Equinoxe Cage, Glenoid, Alpha, Medium Product Usage: The Equinoxe Shoulder System is indicated for use in skeletally mature individuals with degenerative diseases or fractures of
  • Z-0414-2018 · Aug 31, 2017 · Terminated
    Equinoxe Cage, Glenoid, Alpha, Small Product Usage: The Equinoxe Shoulder System is indicated for use in skeletally mature individuals with degenerative diseases or fractures of t

Other Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented devices

All Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page