Skip to content

Equinoxe 314-24-23Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Equinoxe (305)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10885862585356), received between Jan 14, 2025 and Jan 14, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (1 report).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Nov 21, 2023Open, Classified

    Exactech has received 3 complaints for 4 devices related to a loss of vacuum in the inner-most vacuum bag.

    Z-0580-2024 · Root cause: Packaging change control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1

Patient problems

  • Muscle Weakness/Atrophy1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 14, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MALE PATIENT, INITIAL LEFT SHOULDER IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2024, WAS CONVERTED TO A REVERSE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. THE PATIENT¿S SHOULDER WAS VERY STIFF. FOLLOWING THE PATIENT¿S INDEX SURGERY, HE DEVELOPED SOME DELTOID ATROPHY AND SHOWED SOME SUPRASCAPULAR AND AXILLARY NERVE ATROPHY ON EMG. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO CONVERT TO REVERSE. THE EVENT HAPPENED SOMETIME TOWARDS THE END OF THE YEAR. THE HEAD, REPLICATOR PLATE, AND TORQUE SCREW WERE REMOVED. THE STEM WAS WELL FIXED AND RETAINED. THE LASER CAGE GLENOID WAS LOOSE AND ABLE TO BE PULLED OUT WITH A RONGEUR. A POSTERIOR BASEPLATE, 2 34MM SCREWS, 1 30MM SCREW, 38MM EXPANDED SPHERE, LOCKING SCREW, 38MM 0MM LINER, 0MM TRAY, AND REVERSE TORQUE SCREW WERE IMPLANTED. CULTURES WERE TAKEN. THERE WERE NO DEVICE BREAKAGES DURING THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS LESS THAN A 45-MINUTE DELAY DURING THE PROCEDURE, WITH NO ADVERSE EVENT TO THE PATIENT. THE DELAY WAS IN REFERENCE TO THE NEED FOR A REVISION SURGERY AT ALL. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. X-RAYS WERE PROVIDED. THE EXPLANTED PRODUCT IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. IMAGES WERE PROVIDED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION.

    Patient problems: Muscle Weakness/Atrophy

    MAUDE report 21151933 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented devices

All Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page