TRUFILL DCS ORBIT 638MF0410Recalls & reported problems
Cerenovus, Inc. · TRUFILL DCS ORBIT Detachable Coil with Tight Distal Loop technology 175cm d= 2/3D D=4mm 10cm Coil Type: Mini Complex Fill · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10886704030171), received between Jun 5, 2017 and Jun 5, 2017 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Positioning Failure” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Positioning Failure1
- Stretched1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 5, 2017Positioning Failure; Stretched; Positioning Failure; Stretched
AS REPORTED BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, DURING COIL EMBOLIZATION AN ORBIT MINI COMP FILL 4X10 TDL (638MF0410/17526643) COULD NOT BE DETACHED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PRE-DEPLOYMENT ELECTRICAL CHECK WAS PERFORMED AND GREEN SYSTEM READY LIGHT HAD ILLUMINATED. ALL CONNECTIONS APPEARED TO FIT PROPERLY WITHOUT APPLICATION OF EXCESSIVE FORCE. THE COIL WAS WITHDRAWN AND UPON REMOVAL COIL STRETCHING WAS NOTED. THE COIL WAS STILL ATTACHED TO THE DELIVERY SYSTEM WHEN REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. A NEW COIL WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE SAME CONNECTING CABLE AND DETACHMENT BOX WAS USED WITH THE SUBSEQUENT COILS. THERE WERE NO DAMAGES NOTED ON THE MICROCATHETER PRIOR TO USE OR UPON REMOVAL AND AN ADEQUATE FLUSH WAS MAINTAINED THROUGH THE CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT INJURY. THERE WAS NO DELAY OR INTERVENTIONAL TREATMENT DUE TO THE EVENT. IT WAS INITIALLY REPORTED THAT THE COMPLAINT PRODUCT IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6612201 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page