ENVOY 670-256-90BRecalls & reported problems
Cerenovus, Inc. · ENVOY XB Guiding Catheter MPC 90 cm 6F (2.0 mm) .070 Inch (1.8 mm) · Class 2
All models of ENVOY (15)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10886704031727), received between Jun 14, 2017 and Jun 15, 2017 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Split” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Split3
- Physical Resistance2
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 15, 2017Split; Physical Resistance; Split; Physical Resistance
AS REPORTED BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL AN ENVOY CATHETER (67025690B/ 17641208) WOULD NOT ADVANCE UP THE CORDIS SHEATH, AND WHEN IT COULD ADVANCE IT WAS STIFF AND CAUSED THE ENVOY TO BREAK (CRACKED/SPLIT) AT THE DISTAL TIP. THE SAME ISSUE OCCURRED 2 DAYS RUNNING (ADDITIONAL COMPLAINT ADDED). THIS HOSPITAL HAS USED THE SAME SETUP INCLUDING THE CATHETER AND SHEATH AND HAS HAD THIS ISSUE OCCUR A FEW TIMES IN THE LAST CALENDAR YEAR; HOWEVER, ALL COMPLAINTS WERE REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THE DEVICE WAS USED AS PER THE IFU, AND A FLUSH HAD BEEN MAINTAINED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER AND SHEATH WAS AVAILABLE FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6644942 ↗MalfunctionJun 15, 2017Split; Physical Resistance; Split; Physical Resistance
AS REPORTED BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL AN ENVOY CATHETER (67025690B/ 17641208) WOULD NOT ADVANCE UP THE CORDIS SHEATH, AND WHEN IT COULD ADVANCE IT WAS STIFF AND CAUSED THE ENVOY TO BREAK (CRACKED/SPLIT) AT THE DISTAL TIP. THE SAME ISSUE OCCURRED 2 DAYS RUNNING (ADDITIONAL COMPLAINT ADDED). THIS HOSPITAL HAS USED THE SAME SETUP INCLUDING THE CATHETER AND SHEATH AND HAS HAD THIS ISSUE OCCUR A FEW TIMES IN THE LAST CALENDAR YEAR; HOWEVER, ALL COMPLAINTS WERE REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THE DEVICE WAS USED AS PER THE IFU, AND A FLUSH HAD BEEN MAINTAINED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER AND SHEATH WAS AVAILABLE FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6644869 ↗MalfunctionJun 14, 2017Split; Split
AS REPORTED BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, AN ENVOY CATHETER (67025690B/ 17641208) WOULD NOT ADVANCE UP THE CORDIS SHEATH. WHEN IT COULD ADVANCE, IT WAS STIFF AND CAUSED THE ENVOY TO SPLIT/CRACK AT THE TIP. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION COULD BE PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6642240 ↗
Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page