Skip to content

ENVOY 670-260-90Recalls & reported problems

Cerenovus, Inc. · ENVOY Guiding Catheter STR 90 cm 6F (2.0 mm) .070 Inch (1.8 mm) · Class 2

All models of ENVOY (15)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10886704031796), received between Nov 5, 2024 and Feb 23, 2026 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Contamination /Decontamination Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Contamination /Decontamination Problem1
  • Fluid/Blood Leak1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 23, 2026Contamination /Decontamination Problem; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    ON (B)(6) 2026, DURING AN EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE TARGETING THE MIDDLE MENINGEAL ARTERY, UPON THE INSERTION OF THE 6F 90 CM, STRAIGHT ENVOY® GUIDING CATHETER (67026090 / 31740728), THERE WAS STRONG RESISTANCE BETWEEN THE ENVOY AND THE INNER CATHETER STARTING AROUND THE OPHTHALMIC ARTERY (AO). CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS MAINTAINED. THE VESSEL COURSE WAS TORTUOUS. WHEN THE ENVOY WAS WITHDRAWN, AN UNIDENTIFIED MATERIAL WAS FOUND ATTACHED TO IT. THE ENVOY WAS REPLACED WITH A NEW ENVOY OF THE SAME SIZE, AND THE REPLACEMENT ENVOY CATHETER WAS USED WITH THE SAME INNER CATHETER WITHOUT ANY PROBLEMS. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO NEGATIVE IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. ON 09-FEB-2026, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED. THE INFORMATION PROVIDED INCLUDES THE PHYSICIAN¿S COMMENTS ON THE REPORTED ISSUE AND DETAILS RELATED TO THE PROCEDURE. ¿THE AORTIC TORTUOSITY APPEARED TO HAVE SEVERAL MARKEDLY TORTUOUS SEGMENTS, WHICH I BELIEVE WAS ONE OF THE FACTORS CAUSING RESISTANCE DURING CATHETER INSERTION. THE TORTUOSITY AT THE [COMMON CAROTID ARTERY] CCA ORIGIN WAS SUCH THAT IT BENT ABOUT 90 DEGREES IMMEDIATELY AFTER ITS ORIGIN, AND I THOUGHT THIS WAS FAIRLY PRONOUNCED. THE INNER CATHETER U

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24415999 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 5, 2024Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak

    THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTERVENTIONAL ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURE TARGETING AN ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION (AVM), THE PHYSICIAN WAS GAINING ACCESS TO THE ARTERY WHILE ADVANCING A 6F 90 CM, STRAIGHT ENVOY® GUIDING CATHETER (67026090 / 31040775) WHEN IT WAS NOTICED THAT BLOOD WAS LEAKING AROUND THE HUB OF THE CATHETER WHERE THE YELLOW HUB MEETS THE WHITE ID BAND. THE ENVOY WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NEW ONE AND THE PROCEDURE WENT FORWARD SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO NEGATIVE IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. ON 04-NOV-2024, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED. PER THE INFORMATION, THE LOCATION OF THE AVM AND VESSEL CHARACTERISTICS (VESSEL TORTUOSITY OR ACUTE BENDS) ARE NOT KNOWN. THE REPLACEMENT DEVICE WAS ANOTHER ENVOY (67026090).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20613941 ↗

Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices

All CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page