DELTAXSFT DLX100203Recalls & reported problems
Cerenovus, Inc. · DELTAXSFT Microcoil 10 Stretch Resistant Coil and Detachable Coil System Contents: 1 Detachable Coil System Coil Type: DELTAXSFT 10 Microcoil 2mm (coil diameter) x 3cm (coil length) 190cm (working length) · Class 2 · Implant
All models of DELTAXSFT (13)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10886704077312), received between Feb 24, 2017 and Jun 5, 2018 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Kinked” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Kinked1
- Physical Resistance1
- Positioning Failure1
- Premature Activation1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 5, 2018Kinked; Kinked
THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE TO TREAT A GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE CASE, THE MICROCATHETER WAS FLUSHED AND THE DELTAXSFT10 2 MM X 3 CM (DLX100203 / S13388) WAS INSERTED INTO THE HUB OF THE INTRODUCER BUT THE COIL COULD NOT BE ADVANCED THROUGH THE INTRODUCER. THE INTRODUCER WAS REMOVED ONCE AND FLUSHED BEFORE THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO INSERT THE COIL AND ADVANCE IT THROUGH THE INTRODUCER; THE COIL COULD NOT BE ADVANCED AND BECAME STUCK IN THE INTRODUCER TIP. THE COIL WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED. IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE PRESCORE AREA OF THE INTRODUCER WAS NOT OPENED AND THE COIL AND THE DEVICE POSITIONING UNIT (DPU) WAS NOT EXPOSED. THE COIL AND THE DPU DID NOT PROTRUDE FROM THE INTRODUCER. THE TARGET SITE AND VESSEL CHARACTERISTIC WAS NOT KNOWN. AFTER THE COIL WAS REPLACED, THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT FURTHER ISSUE OR DELAY. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT INJURY OR COMPLICATION; THE PRODUCT WAS NEW AND WAS STORED PER LABELING INSTRUCTIONS. THE PROCEDURE WAS CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INSTRUCTION FOR USE (IFU) WITH CONSTANT FLUSH MAINTAINED AT ALL TIME. THERE WAS NO VISIBLE DEFECT OR DAMAGE NOTED ON THE PRODUCT PRIOR TO TH
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7569932 ↗InjuryFeb 24, 2017Positioning Failure; Premature Activation; Physical Resistance; Positioning Failure; Premature Activation; Physical Resistance
AS REPORTED BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, DURING AN ELECTIVE RECOILING PROCEDURE OF THE 7 MM X 7 MM ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY ANEURYSM WITH A 3 MM NECK, A DELTAXSFT COIL (DLX100203/ S12014) FAILED TO DETACH, AND DURING ATTEMPTED RETRIEVAL, BECAME ENTANGLED WITH PREVIOUS COILS, DETACHED AND PROLAPSED OUT OF THE ANEURYSM. THE PROLAPSED COIL WAS SECURED TO THE VESSEL WALL BY A STENT; HOWEVER, DURING ATTEMPT TO ADVANCE THE ENTERPRISE STENT (ENF401612/ 10621542) THROUGH A PROWLER SELECT PLUS MICROCATHETER (606S255X/ 17610383) FRICTION WAS FELT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT INJURY DUE TO THE EVENTS, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS DELAYED 10 MINUTES TO IMPLANT THE ENTERPRISE. THERE WERE INITIALLY TWO SPECTRA COILS ADVANCED AND DEPLOYED WITHOUT INCIDENT (GLY120510/ S11510 AND DLX100254/ C41705). THE THIRD COIL (COMPLAINT PRODUCT) WAS ADVANCED INTO POSITION SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO RESISTANCE DURING ADVANCEMENT THROUGH THE SL 10 MICROCATHETER. DURING THE FIRST AND ONLY ATTEMPTED DETACHMENT, THE COIL DID NOT DETACH USING THE NEW SPECTRA BOX WITH THE ORANGE PLACARD (CATALOG/LOT UNK). THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO RETRIEVE THE COIL; HOWEVER, IT BECAME ENTANGLED WITH PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED COILS AND DETACH
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6356144 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page