DELTAFILL DLF100720Recalls & reported problems
Cerenovus, Inc. · DELTAFILL Microcoil 10 Stretch Resistant Coil and Detachable Coil System Contents: 1 Detachable Coil System Coil Type: DELTAFILL 10 Stretch Resistant Coil 7mm (coil diameter) x 20cm (coil length) 190cm (working length) · Class 2 · Implant
All models of DELTAFILL (29)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10886704079408), received between Nov 6, 2017 and Oct 18, 2021 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Stretched” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Stretched2
- Failure to Advance1
- Kinked1
- Material Separation1
- Migration1
- Physical Resistance1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 18, 2021Stretched; Failure to Advance; Stretched; Failure to Advance
AS REPORTED BY THE FIELD, DURING A COIL EMBOLIZATION, A DELTAFILL10 7MMX20CM COIL (DLF100720, L14263) WAS BEING USED AS A FIRST COIL. THE COIL COULDN'T BE ADVANCED NOR RETRIEVED BY THE PHYSICIAN. THE PHYSICIAN PULLED THE COIL AND THE UNSPECIFIED MICROCATHETER (MC) AT THE SAME TIME. AFTER INSPECTION, IT TURNS OUT TO BE STRETCHED. THE PHYSICIAN USED A SAME LIKE PRODUCT. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY FINISHED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12647505 ↗MalfunctionJan 28, 2021Material Separation; Migration; Material Separation; Migration
THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT THE (B)(6) MALE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A RIGHT LATERAL WIDE NECK BASILAR ANEURYSM WITH SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE UNDERWENT THE ENDOVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE. A BALLOON CATHETER, MICROCATHETER AND A 7F CATHETER WERE USED WITH THE 7MM X 20CM DELTAFILL 10 COIL (DLF100720 / L14263). WHEN THEY DRAINED OFF THE BALLOON CATHETER, THE COIL ¿STARTED TO FALL OUT.¿ THE PHYSICIAN WANTED TO REMOVE THE COIL AND IT WAS THE FIRST ATTEMPT WHEN THE COIL BROKE INTO TWO PIECES. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO CATCH THE SMALLER PIECE WITH THE BALLOON CATHETER AND THE OTHER PIECE TOGETHER WITH THE MICROCATHETER. THE REPORTED EVENT RESULTED IN A 10-MINUTE PROCEDURE DELAY. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EVENT OR COMPLICATION TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11248351 ↗MalfunctionNov 6, 2017Kinked; Stretched; Physical Resistance; Kinked; Stretched; Physical Resistance
AS REPORTED BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, WHILE USING A DELTAFILL10 (DLF100720/S11190), THERE WAS RESISTANCE BETWEEN THE COIL AND INTRODUCER DURING ADVANCEMENT OF THE COIL INTO THE PROWLER LPS (606S155MX/LOT UNK) AND THE COIL WAS FOUND TO BE DAMAGED DURING PRODUCT ANALYSIS. THE COIL WAS FLUSHED PER PROTOCOL AND PLACED INTO HEMOSTATIC VALVE. AS THE DOCTOR BEGAN TO PUSH THE COIL INTO THE INTRODUCER/MICROCATHETER HE ENCOUNTERED RESISTANCE. HE PULLED BACK THE SYSTEM, REINTRODUCED INTO HEMOSTATIC VALVE AND ATTEMPTED TO ADVANCE THE COIL AGAIN GETTING THE SAME RESISTANCE. THE COIL WAS REMOVED FROM THE VALVE AND NOT USED. THE DELTAFILL DID NOT APPEAR DAMAGED. THE PROCEDURE WAS NOT DELAYED AND WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED USING THE SAME MICROCATHETER. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE WOULD BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7004844 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page