CEREPAK FREEFORM MCR093060Recalls & reported problems
Cerenovus, Inc. · CEREPAK FREEFORM Mini Detachable Coil Delivery System Length - 190 cm Coil Diameter - 3 mm Coil Length - 6 cm · Class 2 · Implant
All models of CEREPAK FREEFORM (60)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10886704083061), received between Mar 6, 2024 and Nov 15, 2024 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Separation Failure” (3 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Oct 2, 2025Class IOpen, Classified
Detachable coils system may fail to detach, which could result in hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke, procedural delays, or the need for additional surgical intervention.
Z-0434-2026 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Separation Failure3
- Premature Separation2
- Break1
- Material Separation1
- Stretched1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 15, 2024Separation Failure; Premature Separation; Separation Failure; Premature Separation
THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN ENDOVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE TARGETING A LEFT POSTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY (PCOM) ANEURYSM, EIGHT (8) COILS WERE IMPLANTED WITHOUT FAIL. TWO COILS FAILED TO DETACH: THE TWO COILS ARE A 12MM X 30CM CEREPAK FREEFORM (SCR121230 / 31173118) AND A 3MM X 6CM CEREPAK FREEFORM MINI (MCR093060 / 31207074). IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT ANY DELAY. THERE WAS NO NEGATIVE PATIENT IMPACT. ON 30-OCT-2024, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED. PER THE INFORMATION, THE ANEURYSM WAS AN UNRUPTURED SACCULAR ANEURYSM WITH A SIZE OF 11MM. THE DETACHMENT HANDLE (MDH1 / 102109430) WAS USED ON THE FIRST COIL, THE 12MM X 30CM CEREPAK FREEFORM (SCR121230 / 31173118) FOR ONE DETACHMENT ATTEMPT, WHEN THE COIL DID NOT DETACH, THEY SWITCHED TO MANUAL BREAK. THE 12MM X 30CM CEREPAK FREEFORM COIL STILL DID NOT DETACH. PER THE INFORMATION, MANUAL BREAK WAS THE PRIMARY METHOD OF DETACHMENT FOR ALL REMAINING COILS. THE DETACHMENT HANDLE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. WHEN THE 12MM X 30CM CEREPAK FREEFORM COIL WAS REMOVED, IT WAS STILL ATTACHED TO THE DELIVERY SYSTEM. WHEN THE 3MM X 6CM CEREPAK FREEFORM MINI (MCR093060 /
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20700413 ↗MalfunctionSep 18, 2024Stretched; Premature Separation; Stretched; Premature Separation
AS REPORTED BY THE FIELD, DURING A COIL EMBOLIZATION, A FREEFORM MINI 3MM X 6CM COIL, (MCR093060, 31349400) STRETCHED ONCE INSERTED INTO THE RHV HUB OF THE MICROCATHETER AND ULTIMATELY SOMEHOW DETACHED WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER. HOWEVER, THE PHYSICIAN AND THE LEAD TECH, NOTICED RIGHT AWAY AND THE ENTIRE MICROCATHETER WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT WITH THE DETACHED COIL INSIDE AND ANEW MICROCATHETER WAS USED. THERE WAS A 10-MINUTE PROCEDURAL DELAY DUE TO THE EVENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED. ADDITIONAL EVENT INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 17-SEP-2024 INDICATED THAT PREVIOUS COILS WERE ABLE TO BE ADVANCED THRU THE SAME MICROCATHETER BEFORE THE ISSUE. THE PHYSICIAN HAD TO ACCESS THE ANEURYSM WITH A BRAND NEW MICROCATHETER AND GUIDEWIRE. THE WAS NO CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE IN THE 10 MINUTE PROCEDURAL DELAY, HOWEVER, THERE WAS ADDED RISK HAVING TO RE-ACCESS DUE TO OUR COIL PREMATURELY DETACHING IN THE MICROCATHETER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20247681 ↗MalfunctionMar 25, 2024Separation Failure; Separation Failure
THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT-ASSISTED ENDOVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE TARGETING A POSTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY (PCOM) ANEURYSM, THE PHYSICIAN WAS EMPLOYING THE STENT/COIL TECHNIQUE. A STENTING MICROCATHETER (UNSPECIFIED BRAN) WAS PLACED DISTAL TO THE ANEURYSM. A COIL MICROCATHETER, EXCELSIOR® XT-17¿ MICROCATHETER (STRYKER) WAS PLACED INTO THE ANEURYSM. THE STENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY DEPLOYED JAILING THE XT-17 MICROCATHETER. A 4MM X 10CM CEREPAK FREEFORM XTRASOFT COIL WAS PLACED INTO THE ANEURYSM AND DETACHED SUCCESSFULLY VIA A DETACHMENT HANDLE. A 3MM X 6CM CEREPAK FREEFORM MINI (MCR093060 / 31162595) WAS INTRODUCED INTO THE ANEURYSM AND AFTER PROPER ALIGNMENT OF THE DETACHMENT MARKERS WERE NOTED, A HANDLE DETACHMENT WAS PERFORMED. VISUALIZATION OF THE PROXIMAL PULL WIRE WAS NOTED TO HAVE APPROXIMATELY DOUBLED IN LENGTH AFTER THE DETACHMENT ATTEMPT. IT WAS CONFIRMED VIA FLUOROSCOPY THAT THE COIL WAS NOT DETACHED. A SECOND HANDLE (MDH1 / LOT# UNKNOWN) WAS PERFORMED WITH SIMILAR RESULTS. THE PHYSICIAN THEN PERFORMED MANUAL BREAK DETACHMENT WHICH ALSO DID NOT DETACH THE COIL. THE COIL WAS EFFECTIVELY REMOVED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ANY NEGATIVE PATIENT IM
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18976016 ↗MalfunctionMar 11, 2024Material Separation; Separation Failure; Material Separation; Separation Failure
THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT THE 81-YEAR-OLD FEMALE PATIENT UNDERWENT A STENT-ASSISTED ENDOVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION TARGETING A BASILAR ANEURYSM. THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO USE CEREPAK COILS TO TREAT THE ANEURYSM; THIS WAS HIS FIRST TIME USING CEREPAK FOR A PATIENT. A STENTING MICROCATHETER WAS PLACED DISTAL TO THE ANEURYSM. A PHENOM¿ 17 MICROCATHETER (MEDTRONIC) WAS PLACED INTO THE ANEURYSM. A 3MM X 6CM CEREPAK FREEFORM MINI (MCR093060 / 31162595) WAS INTRODUCED INTO THE ANEURYSM WITH A SINGLE LOOP PLACED INTO THE ANEURYSM FOR APPROXIMATELY 3 MINUTES WHILE THE STENT WAS DEPLOYED ACROSS THE NECK OF THE ANEURYSM, JAILING THE COIL CATHETER WITHIN THE ANEURYSM. THE REMAINING COIL WAS THEN INTRODUCED INTO THE ANEURYSM WITH THE PROPER DETACHMENT MARKERS ALIGNED FOR COIL DETACHMENT. THE MANUAL BREAK TECHNIQUE WAS PERFORMED BY THE PHYSICIAN¿S FELLOW PHYSICIAN. AT THIS TIME, FLUOROSCOPY WAS USED TO CONFIRM COIL DETACHMENT, WHICH WAS REPORTEDLY NOT ACHIEVED. THE PHYSICIAN WAS THEN INSTRUCTED TO GENTLY PULL THE REMAINING PULL WIRE BECAUSE THE PROXIMAL HYPOTUBE WAS PULLED OFF DURING THE FIRST DETACHMENT ATTEMPT. FAILURE OF DETACHMENT WAS CONFIRMED VIA FLUOROSCOPY, WHICH AT THAT POINT
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18882539 ↗MalfunctionMar 6, 2024Break; Break
ON 26-FEB-2024, VIA THE MEDSUN REPORT (B)(4), THERE WERE THREE ADDITIONAL COILS DOCUMENTED. THE COILS ARE A 2MM X 4CM CEREPAK FREEFORM MINI (MCR092040 / 31098100), A 3MM X 6CM CEREPAK FREEFORM MINI (MCR093060 / 31136064), AND A 3MM X 8CM CEREPAK FREEFORM XSFT (XCR120308 / 31162597). ON 04-MAR-2024, CLARIFYING INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE CERENOVUS SALES REPRESENTATIVE. THE INFORMATION INDICATED THAT THE 3MM X 6CM CEREPAK FREEFORM MINI (MCR093060 / 31136064) WAS OPENED AND THE TECH BENT THE COIL WHILE ADVANCING IT THROUGH THE MICROCATHETER; THE COIL WAS REMOVED AND DISCARDED. THE 3MM X 8CM CEREPAK FREEFORM XSFT (XCR120308 / 31162597) WAS ALSO BENT BY THE TECH DURING ADVANCEMENT THROUGH THE MICROCATHETER; IT WAS ALSO REMOVED AND DISCARDED. THE 2MM X 4CM CEREPAK FREEFORM MINI (MCR092040 / 31098100) WAS OPENED AND AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO PLACE THE COIL, BUT THE ANEURYSM WOULD NOT ACCOMMODATE THE COIL SO IT WAS REMOVED AND THE PHYSICIAN ENDED THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO ISSUE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS COIL. IT WAS ALSO DISCARDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18852968 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page