CEREPAK FREEFORM XCR120515Recalls & reported problems
Cerenovus, Inc. · CEREPAK FREEFORM XtraSoft Detachable Coil Delivery System Length - 190 cm Coil Diameter - 5 mm Coil Length - 15 cm · Class 2 · Implant
All models of CEREPAK FREEFORM (60)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10886704083702), received between Jan 2, 2024 and Aug 22, 2025 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Separation Failure” (4 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Oct 2, 2025Class IOpen, Classified
Detachable coils system may fail to detach, which could result in hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke, procedural delays, or the need for additional surgical intervention.
Z-0434-2026 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Separation Failure4
- Defective Component1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 22, 2025Defective Component; Defective Component
THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN ENDOVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025, ONE OF THE COILS USED WAS A 5MM X 15CM CEREPAK FREEFORM XTRASOFT (XCR120515 / 31177727). THE ISSUE REPORTED WITH THIS COIL WAS THAT ¿THERE WAS NO VISIBLE MARKER ON THE COIL.¿ THE COIL DETACHED AS NORMAL AND DID NOT CAUSE ANY ISSUE. THERE WAS NO NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE PATIENT. THE COIL WAS RETURNED FOR EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS. BASED ON THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 22-AUG-2025, THE EVENT HAS BEEN DEEMED USFDA REPORTABLE UNDER 21 CFR 803 WITH A CLASSIFICATION OF ¿MALFUNCTION.¿
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22878204 ↗MalfunctionJan 27, 2025Separation Failure; Separation Failure
THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN ENDOVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, THE 5MM X 15CM CEREPAK FREEFORM XTRASOFT COIL (XCR120515 / 31173107) FAILED TO DETACH AFTER THREE ATTEMPTS. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ANY NEGATIVE PATIENT IMPACT. ON 21-JAN-2025, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED. PER THE INFORMATION, THE PROCEDURE WAS TARGETING A WIDE-NECKED 6.5MM X 6.8MM X 7MM UNRUPTURED ANEURYSM ON THE LEFT MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY (MCA) AT THE BIFURCATION. THE INFORMATION INDICATED THAT TWO OF THE THREE ATTEMPTS WERE MADE WITH THE DETACHMENT HANDLE (MDH1 / 102109430); THE THIRD ATTEMPT WAS VIA MANUAL BREAK. THE HANDLE IS REPORTED AS NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. THE COIL WAS NOT STRETCHED WHEN IT WAS REMOVED; IT WAS NO LONGER STILL ON THE DELIVERY WIRE. THE MICROCATHETER USED WAS AN EXCELSIOR® SL-10® MICROCATHETER (STRYKER). THE REPLACEMENT COIL WAS A 5MM X 10CM CEREPAK FREEFORM XSFT (XCR120510), NOT ANOTHER 5MM X 15CM CEREPAK FREEFORM XTRASOFT OF THE SAME PRODUCT CODE (XCR120515). THE INFORMATION CONFIRMED THERE WAS NO NEGATIVE PATIENT IMPACT AND NO DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE AS A RESULT OF THE REPORTED ISSUE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21246968 ↗MalfunctionApr 3, 2024Separation Failure; Separation Failure
THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT PRESENTED TO (B)(6) HOSPITAL WITH AN INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE. AFTER A VERY DIFFICULT ACCESS, THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO NAVIGATE THE ANEURYSM THROUGH TORTUOUS ANATOMY. USING A HEADWAY® DUO MICROCATHETER (MICROVENTION), THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO DEPLOY THE FIRST COIL, A 5MM X 15CM CEREPAK FREEFORM XTRASOFT (XCR120515 / 31111683). THE COIL FAILED TO DETACH WITH THE CEREPAK TM MECHANICAL DETACHMENT HANDLE (MDH1 / 102109430). MANUAL BREAK WAS ATTEMPTED WITHOUT SUCCESS. THE COIL WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER 5MM X 15CM CEREPAK FREEFORM XTRASOFT (XCR120515) FROM THE SAME LOT (31111683) HERE MANUAL BREAK AS THE FIRST METHOD OF DETACHMENT, AND IT WAS ALSO UNSUCCESSFUL. IT WAS REPORTED THAT AT THIS POINT, A 2MM X 2CM CEREPAK FREEFORM MINI (MCR092020 / 31177313) WAS ADVANCED. ONCE AGAIN, MANUAL BREAK WAS CHOSEN AT THE PRIMARY DETACHMENT METHOD, AND AGAIN, THE COIL DID NOT DETACH. AT THIS POINT, THE COIL WAS REMOVED AND THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED WHAT APPEARED TO BE ¿FILAMENT¿ RETAINED WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO REMOVE [THE FILAMENT] WITHOUT INCIDENT AND THE PROCEDURE WAS MOVED FORWARD USING MICROVENTION COILS. THERE WAS NO
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19038172 ↗MalfunctionApr 3, 2024Separation Failure; Separation Failure
THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT PRESENTED TO TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL WITH AN INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE. AFTER A VERY DIFFICULT ACCESS, THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO NAVIGATE THE ANEURYSM THROUGH TORTUOUS ANATOMY. USING A HEADWAY® DUO MICROCATHETER (MICROVENTION), THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO DEPLOY THE FIRST COIL, A 5MM X 15CM CEREPAK FREEFORM XTRASOFT (XCR120515 / 31111683). THE COIL FAILED TO DETACH WITH THE CEREPAK TM MECHANICAL DETACHMENT HANDLE (MDH1 / 102109430). MANUAL BREAK WAS ATTEMPTED WITHOUT SUCCESS. THE COIL WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER 5MM X 15CM CEREPAK FREEFORM XTRASOFT (XCR120515) FROM THE SAME LOT (31111683) HERE MANUAL BREAK AS THE FIRST METHOD OF DETACHMENT, AND IT WAS ALSO UNSUCCESSFUL. IT WAS REPORTED THAT AT THIS POINT, A 2MM X 2CM CEREPAK FREEFORM MINI (MCR092020 / 31177313) WAS ADVANCED. ONCE AGAIN, MANUAL BREAK WAS CHOSEN AT THE PRIMARY DETACHMENT METHOD, AND AGAIN, THE COIL DID NOT DETACH. AT THIS POINT, THE COIL WAS REMOVED AND THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED WHAT APPEARED TO BE ¿FILAMENT¿ RETAINED WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO REMOVE [THE FILAMENT] WITHOUT INCIDENT AND THE PROCEDURE WAS MOVED FORWARD USING MICROVENTION COILS. THERE
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19038167 ↗MalfunctionJan 2, 2024Separation Failure; Separation Failure
THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN WAS EMBOLIZING A CAROTID-CAVERNOUS FISTULA (CCF) WITH MODERATE TORTUOSITY. THE PHYSICIAN DEPLOYED A TOTAL OF 12 COILS AD THEN USED ONYX¿ 34 LIQUID EMBOLIC AND ONYX¿ 18 LIQUID EMBOLIC (MEDTRONIC). THE FOLLOWING THREE COILS: 5MM X 10CM CEREPAK FREEFORM XSFT (XCR120510 / 31146337), 5MM X 15CM CEREPAK FREEFORM XSFT (XCR120515 / 31173107), AND 4MM X 12CM CEREPAK FREEFORM (SCR120412 / 31140706) DID NOT DETACH UTILIZING THE MANUAL DETACHMENT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT BREAKING OF THE MANUAL BREAK WAS DIFFICULT, BUT ULTIMATELY IT WAS ABLE TO EXPOSE THE PULL WIRE AND PULL BACK THE WIRE TO ATTEMPT TO DETACH THE COIL. THE DIFFICULTY WITH THE BREAKING OF THE MANUAL BREAK AT THE SORTING HAPPENED ON ALL COILS DOCUMENTED IN THIS COMPLAINT. ALL THREE COILS WERE ABLE TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT ANY NEGATIVE PATIENT IMPACT. ONE OF THE COILS REPORTEDLY DETACHED ON THE TABLE AFTER REMOVAL. THE REPORTED ISSUE RESULTED IN MINIMAL DELAY. THERE WAS NO NEGATIVE PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18432774 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page