CEREGLIDE NIC71137URecalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10886704085386), received between May 19, 2025 and May 5, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Deformation Due to Compressive Stress” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• MalfunctionMay 5, 2026Deformation Due to Compressive Stress

  THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING A STROKE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN USED A 132CM CEREGLIDE 71 INTERMEDIATE CATHETER (NIC71132U / 31668075) THROUGH A ZOOM¿88 ASPIRATION CATHETER (IMPERATIVE CARE). BOTH CATHETERS WERE WELL-HYDRATED (FLUSHED), THE CEREGLIDE REPORTEDLY GOT STUCK IN THE ZOOM 88. DURING THE ADVANCEMENT OF THE CEREGLIDE 71 CATHETER, THE PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT IT FELT TIGHT AND AS A RESULT, THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED IT AND THE CEREGLIDE 71 CATHETER STRETCHED. THE PHYSICIAN TRIED THE SECOND CEREGLIDE, A 137 CM CEREGLIDE 71 CATHETER (NIC71137U / 31684676). EVERYTHING FLUSHED WELL BUT THE SAME ISSUE WAS ENCOUNTERED. THERE WAS NO NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 04-MAY-2026. PER THE INFORMATION, THE PROCEDURE WAS TARGETING THE M1 SEGMENT OF THE LEFT MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY. THE TARGET VESSEL WAS NOT EXCESSIVELY TORTUOUS. THE SECOND CEREGLIDE CATHETER WAS ALSO USED WITH THE ZOOM 88. THE INFORMATION INDICATED THAT FOR BOTH CEREGLIDE CATHETERS, THE ISSUE OCCURRED ON THE FIRST PASS. AFTER THE SECOND CEREGLIDE CATHETER, THE PHYSICIAN USED A ZOOM 7MM X 137MM TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE ZOOM 88 WAS ALSO USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDUR

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 25086331 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 27, 2026Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Physical Resistance/Sticking

  A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING A MECHANICAL THROMBECTOMY TO THE LEFT MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY, SEGMENT M1, THE PHYSICIAN WAS TRYING TO INSERT THE 137CM CEREGLIDE 71 CATHETER (PRODUCT CODE: NIC71137U, LOT NUMBER: UNKNOWN) INTO A COPILOT TOUHEY THAT WAS CONNECTED TO A ZOOM 88 BASE CATHETER AND HE FELT RESISTANCE. HE REMOVED THE CEREGLIDE AND NOTICED IT WAS KINKED. ADDITIONAL EVENT INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 22-APR-2026 INDICATED THAT THE KINK OCCURRED IN THE PATIENT, PRIOR TO ASPIRATION OR DELIVERING STENT RETRIEVER. THE CATHETER TIP WAS INSIDE THE TOUEY WHEN THE DAMAGE WAS OBSERVED. THE DEVICE/SYSTEM WAS REMOVED OR REPLACED TO CONTINUE THE PROCEDURE. THE EVENT DID NOT RESULT IN ANY UNDUE PROCEDURAL DELAY THAT COULD BE CONSIDERED CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY IN REMOVING DEVICE FROM PACKAGING. A DIRECT ASPIRATION FIRST PASS TECHNIQUE (ADAPT) WAS USED. THE DEVICE WAS NOT SNAKED. THE ANARTOMOY WAS NOTED AS ¿NORMAL¿. THERE WAS NO BREAK IN MATERIAL INTEGRITY AT THE SITE OF THE DEFECT, SUCH AS CRACKING OR FRACTURE.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 24999606 ↗
• InjuryMay 19, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING A THROMBECTOMY PROCEDURE THAT WAS TARGETING A THROMBUS IN THE M1 SEGMENT OF THE MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY (MCA), THE PHYSICIAN WAS USING CEREGLIDE 92 INNERGLIDE 9 122 CM CATHETER SYSTEM (SBC92122UG / 31485382) AND A 137 CM CEREGLIDE 71 CATHETER (NIC71137U / 31528444). IT WAS REPORTED THAT, ¿AFTER [THE] FIRST PASS, 2A AND DISTAL MIGRATION OF CLOT. [A SOLITAIRE¿ STENT RETRIEVER (MEDTRONIC)] WAS USED AND TICI3 WAS OBSERVED WITH SMALL DISSECTION. NO TREATMENT OF DISSECTION WAS REQUIRED, AND [THE] PATIENT WAS STABLE. THIS IS NOT A PARTICULAR DEVICE COMPLICATION, RATHER A CASE NOTATION.¿

  Patient problems: Thromboembolism; Vascular Dissection

  MAUDE report 22048776 ↗