Skip to content

NA 214643Recalls & reported problems

Medos International Sàrl · SIXTER - LEFT · Class 1

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10886705004249), received between Jan 3, 2020 and Apr 11, 2024 — classified as 8 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Deformation” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 2 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Deformation3
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available2
  • Break2
  • Difficult to Open or Close2
  • Degraded1
  • Device-Device Incompatibility1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 11, 2024Material Deformation; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Material Deformation; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE AFFILIATE IN IRELAND THAT DURING SERVICE AND REPAIR, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT ARTHRO SIXTER-RIGHT *EA DEVICE WAS DEFECTIVE. DURING IN-HOUSE ENGINEERING EVALUATION, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE SHARP TIP WAS OBSERVED TO BE BENT WHICH CAUSED AN OBSTRUCTION TO THE JAW, THEREFORE IT COULD NOT BE OPENED OR CLOSED.. THERE WAS NO PROCEDURE INVOLVED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19087710 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 11, 2024Material Deformation; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Material Deformation; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE AFFILIATE IN IRELAND THAT DURING SERVICE AND REPAIR, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT ARTHRO SIXTER-RIGHT *EA DEVICE WAS DEFECTIVE. DURING IN-HOUSE ENGINEERING EVALUATION, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE SHARP TIP WAS NOTICEABLY BENT WHICH CAUSED AN OBSTRUCTION TO THE JAW, THEREFORE IT COULD NOT BE OPENED OR CLOSED.. THERE WAS NO PROCEDURE INVOLVED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19087074 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 29, 2022Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 2 FOR (B)(4). IT WAS REPORTED BY THE SALES REP IN UNITED KINGDOM THAT DURING AN UNKNOWN SURGERY ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE SIXTER - LEFT DEVICE WAS ABLE TO CAPTURE THE SUTURE INITIALLY BUT WHEN THE SUTURE WAS PASSED THROUGH THE TISSUE, IT WAS LOST. ANOTHER LIKE DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES NOR SURGICAL DELAY REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14856179 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 7, 2022Break; Difficult to Open or Close; Break; Difficult to Open or Close

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE AFFILIATE IN (B)(6) THAT DURING AN UNKNOWN SURGERY ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE ARTHRO SIXTER-LEFT DEVICE WAS NOT FUNCTIONING RELIABLY AS IT WOULD PENETRATE THE TISSUE BUT DID NOT OPEN. DURING IN-HOUSE ENGINEERING EVALUATION, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE SAFETY SHEAR PIN WAS PARTIALLY BROKEN. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES NOR SURGICAL DELAY REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13685334 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 7, 2022Break; Difficult to Open or Close; Break; Difficult to Open or Close

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE AFFILIATE IN (B)(6) THAT DURING AN UNKNOWN SURGERY ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE ARTHRO SIXTER-LEFT DEVICE WAS NOT FUNCTIONING RELIABLY AS IT WOULD PENETRATE THE TISSUE BUT DID NOT OPEN. DURING IN-HOUSE ENGINEERING EVALUATION, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE SAFETY SHEAR PIN WAS PARTIALLY BROKEN. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES NOR SURGICAL DELAY REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13685309 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 2, 2021Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE SALES REP THAT DURING AN ARTHROSCOPIC SHOULDER STABILIZATION PROCEDURE OF THE RIGHT SHOULDER ON (B)(6) 2021, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE ARTHRO SIXTER-LEFT DEVICE WAS BENT. ANOTHER LIKE DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES NOR SURGICAL DELAY REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12415309 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 19, 2021Degraded; Degraded

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE AFFILIATE IN AUSTRALIA THAT DURING A SHOULDER REPAIR PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2020, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE SIXTER DEVICE WAS BLUNT WHILE PASSING THROUGH THE LABRUM. DURING IN-HOUSE ENGINEERING EVALUATION, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE SHAFT WAS BENT. THE SAME DEVICE WAS USED BUT WITH GREATER FORCE THAN USUAL TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT DELAY. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11195569 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 3, 2020Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER VIA PHONE THAT DURING AN ARTHROSCOPY PROCEDURE, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE TIP OF THEIR ARTHRO SIXER LEFT WAS BENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER LIKE DEVICE WITH NO PATIENT HARM OR SURGICAL DELAY TO THE CASE. DURING IN-HOUSE ENGINEERING EVALUATION, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS SLIGHTLY BENT. THERE WAS NO DELAY IN THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE. THERE WAS A SPARE DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR USE TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. THERE WAS PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF INJURIES, MEDICAL INTERVENTION OR PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHOULD BECOME AVAILABLE, A SUPPLEMENTAL MEDWATCH WILL BE SUBMITTED ACCORDINGLY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9546027 ↗

Other ACCESSORIES,ARTHROSCOPIC devices

All ACCESSORIES,ARTHROSCOPIC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page