Skip to content

MULTILOC 03.019.019Recalls & reported problems

Synthes GmbH · CENTERING SLV F/3.5MM TI LCKNG SCR AND 4.5MM TI MULTILOC SCR · Class 1

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10886982069580), received between Sep 21, 2018 and Jan 21, 2025 — classified as 9 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device-Device Incompatibility” (7 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 2 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device-Device Incompatibility7
  • No Apparent Adverse Event2

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient6
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 21, 2025No Apparent Adverse Event; No Apparent Adverse Event

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY WITH THE PRODUCT IN QUESTION. IN THE SURGERY, THE SURGEON CONNECTED THE PRODUCT TO INSERT THE SCREW-IN SCREW, BUT IT CAME OFF EVERY TIME HE DRILLED. HE HAD TO REDO THE PROCEDURE SEVERAL TIMES, BUT AFTER THE FOURTH OR FIFTH TIME HE WAS ABLE TO GET IT TO WORK. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO SURGICAL DELAY. IT WAS ASSUMED THAT BECAUSE IT WAS A SMALL SKIN INCISION, THE SOFT TISSUE WAS INTERVENING AND MAKING IT EASIER FOR THE INSTRUMENT TO COME OFF. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21202939 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 21, 2025No Apparent Adverse Event; No Apparent Adverse Event

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY WITH THE PRODUCT IN QUESTION. IN THE SURGERY, THE SURGEON CONNECTED THE PRODUCT TO INSERT THE SCREW-IN SCREW, BUT IT CAME OFF EVERY TIME HE DRILLED. HE HAD TO REDO THE PROCEDURE SEVERAL TIMES, BUT AFTER THE FOURTH OR FIFTH TIME HE WAS ABLE TO GET IT TO WORK. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO SURGICAL DELAY. IT WAS ASSUMED THAT BECAUSE IT WAS A SMALL SKIN INCISION, THE SOFT TISSUE WAS INTERVENING AND MAKING IT EASIER FOR THE INSTRUMENT TO COME OFF. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21202927 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 2, 2024Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON AN UNKNOWN DATE DURING A MULTILOC PROCEDURES, THE DRILL BIT HIT THE NAIL FOR THE POSTERIOR, ANTERIOR AND DIRECT ANTERIOR SCREW. THE SLEEVES WERE TESTED BEFORE AND UNSURE WHAT HAPPENED. PERFECT CIRCLE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED PROXIMALLY. THERE WAS A PATIENT DELAY. IT WAS UNSURE THAT THE JIG WAS BENT OR NOT DUE TO ROTATING JIG INTRAOP, BUT SURGEON WANTS EVERYTHING REPLACED. THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY OF 5 MINUTES. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) CENT SLV 3.5 TI LCK SCR/4.5 TI MULILC SC THIS IS REPORT 7 OF 9 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18633972 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 13, 2018Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2018, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY FOR THE PROXIMAL HUMERUS WITH MULTILOC HUMERAL NAIL. DURING THE SURGERY, THE SURGEON COULD NOT ATTACH THE CENTERING SLEEVE TO THE MULTILOC SCREW. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT A DELAY ALTHOUGH IT WAS NOT REPORTED HOW THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT. THIS COMPLAINT INVOLVES FOUR (4) DEVICES. THIS REPORT IS 1 OF 4 FOR (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8159754 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 12, 2018Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2018, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY FOR THE PROXIMAL HUMERUS WITH MULTILOC HUMERAL NAIL. DURING THE SURGERY, THE SURGEON COULD NOT ATTACH THE CENTERING SLEEVE TO THE MULTILOC SCREW. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT A DELAY ALTHOUGH IT WAS NOT REPORTED HOW THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT. THIS COMPLAINT INVOLVES FOUR (4) DEVICES. THIS REPORT IS 3 OF 4 FOR (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8157977 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 12, 2018Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2018, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY FOR THE PROXIMAL HUMERUS WITH MULTILOC HUMERAL NAIL. DURING THE SURGERY, THE SURGEON COULD NOT ATTACH THE CENTERING SLEEVE TO THE MULTILOC SCREW. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT A DELAY ALTHOUGH IT WAS NOT REPORTED HOW THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT. THIS COMPLAINT INVOLVES FOUR (4) DEVICES. THIS REPORT IS 2 OF 4 FOR (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8157972 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 21, 2018Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES (B)(4) REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN OSTEOSYNTHESIS SURGERY FOR PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURE ON (B)(6) 2018, THE CENTERING SLEEVE FOR TITANIUM LOCKING SCREWS AND TITANIUM MULTILOC SCREWS COULD NOT BE CONNECTED TO THE HEAD OF THE MULTILOC SCREW. AFTER FAILING MANY TIMES, THE SURGEON TRIED AGAIN WHILE SEEING THE CONNECTING POINT AND DIRECTION OF THE SCREW UNDER DIRECT VISION. HOWEVER, THE SLEEVE COULD NOT BE ATTACHED TO THE SCREW. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH A 30-MINUTE OF SURGICAL DELAY ALTHOUGH IT WAS NOT REPORTED HOW THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) CENTERING SLEEVE FOR TITANIUM LOCKING SCREWS THIS IS REPORT 3 FO 4 FOR (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7900215 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 21, 2018Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES (B)(4) REPORTS AN EVENT IN JAPAN AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN OSTEOSYNTHESIS SURGERY FOR PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURE ON (B)(6) 2018, THE CENTERING SLEEVE FOR TITANIUM LOCKING SCREWS AND TITANIUM MULTILOC SCREWS COULD NOT BE CONNECTED TO THE HEAD OF THE MULTILOC SCREW. AFTER FAILING MANY TIMES, THE SURGEON TRIED AGAIN WHILE SEEING THE CONNECTING POINT AND DIRECTION OF THE SCREW UNDER DIRECT VISION. HOWEVER, THE SLEEVE COULD NOT BE ATTACHED TO THE SCREW. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH A 30-MINUTE OF SURGICAL DELAY ALTHOUGH IT WAS NOT REPORTED HOW THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) CENTERING SLEEVE FOR TITANIUM LOCKING SCREWS THIS IS REPORT 2 FO 4 FOR (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7900210 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 21, 2018Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES EUROPE REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN OSTEOSYNTHESIS SURGERY FOR PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURE ON (B)(6) 2018, THE CENTERING SLEEVE FOR TITANIUM LOCKING SCREWS AND TITANIUM MULTILOC SCREWS COULD NOT BE CONNECTED TO THE HEAD OF THE MULTILOC SCREW. AFTER FAILING MANY TIMES, THE SURGEON TRIED AGAIN WHILE SEEING THE CONNECTING POINT AND DIRECTION OF THE SCREW UNDER DIRECT VISION. HOWEVER, THE SLEEVE COULD NOT BE ATTACHED TO THE SCREW. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH A 30-MINUTE OF SURGICAL DELAY ALTHOUGH IT WAS NOT REPORTED HOW THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) CENTERING SLEEVE FOR TITANIUM LOCKING SCREWS. THIS IS REPORT 1 FO 4 FOR (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7900205 ↗

Other Guide, surgical, instrument devices

All Guide, surgical, instrument devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.