NA 03.037.032Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 54 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10886982070487), received between Feb 20, 2017 and Oct 15, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries, 50 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device-Device Incompatibility” (29 reports).

9 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K131548); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 54 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• MalfunctionOct 15, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Twisted/Bent; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Twisted/Bent

  IT WAS REPORTED ON (B)(6) 2025 AT 2PM DOCTOR REPORTED DIFFICULTY INSERTION OF IM NAIL WITH INSERTION HANDLE RESULTING IN HAVING TO EXTEND INCISION ON PATIENT. OUR DESIGN HAS SINCE BEEN UPDATED TO A LESS ¿BULKY DESIGN¿ AND BELIEVE THIS SHOULD ALLEVIATE THE ISSUE. SAME SURGERY THE IMPLANT NEED TO BE REMOVED AND REINSERTED; EXTRACTION BOLT APPEARS TO BE STRIPPED AS IT WAS DIFFICULT TO THREAD INTO THE IMPLANT. CUMULATIVE TIME ADDED TO PREFORM THE SURGERY ESTIMATED AT 20-30 MINUTES. NO HARDWARE WAS RETAINED AND NO OTHER ISSUES REPORTED.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 23299889 ↗
• MalfunctionOct 15, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Twisted/Bent; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Twisted/Bent

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DOCTOR REPORTED THERE WAS DIFFICULTY WITH THE INSERTION OF AN IM NAIL WITH INSERTION HANDLE RESULTING IN HAVING TO EXTEND THE INCISION ON THE PATIENT. THE DESIGN HAD SINCE BEEN UPDATED TO A LESS ¿BULKY DESIGN¿ AND BELIEVED TO HAVE ALLEVIATED THIS ISSUE. IN THE SAME SURGERY, THE IMPLANT NEEDED TO BE REMOVED AND REINSERTED; EXTRACTION BOLT APPEARS TO BE STRIPPED AS IT WAS DIFFICULT TO THREAD INTO THE IMPLANT. CUMULATIVE TIME ADDED TO PERFORM THE SURGERY IS ESTIMATED AT TWENTY TO THIRTY MINUTES. NO HARDWARE WAS RETAINED AND NO OTHER ISSUES REPORTED.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 23291775 ↗
• MalfunctionAug 21, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

  IT WAS REPORTED TWO INSTRUMENTS (03.037.032 & 03.037.030) COLD WELDED TO IMPLANT DURING EXTRACTION/REMOVAL PROCEDURE. UNABLE TO REMOVE FROM BROKEN IMPLANT. PROCEDURE COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO SURGICAL DELAY

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 22860041 ↗
• MalfunctionJul 25, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Twisted/Bent; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Twisted/Bent

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025 WHILE TAKING OUT TFNA TO CONVERT TO A TOTAL HIP, THE EXTRACTION SCREW WAS CROSS THREADED INTO THE TFNA. THERE WAS A 15 MINUTES OF SURGICAL DELAY DUE TO THE REPORTED EVENT. SURGEON WAS ABLE TO USE THE ANOTHER DEVICE TO REMOVE NAIL. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 22613368 ↗
• MalfunctionJul 25, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REMOVAL SURGERY FOR THE TFNA. AFTER THE NAIL WAS REMOVED, AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO REMOVE THE CONNECTION BETWEEN THE NAIL AND EXTRACTION SCREW, BUT THEY COULD NOT BE REMOVED. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO REMOVE THE NAIL BY HOLDING IT IN PLACE WITH A WRENCH OR OTHER TOOL, BUT THEY COULD NOT BE REMOVED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT ANY SURGICAL DELAY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 22613062 ↗
• MalfunctionJun 12, 2025Material Twisted/Bent; Scratched Material; Material Twisted/Bent; Scratched Material

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NAIL EXTRACTOR THREADS WERE DAMAGED IN DECONTAMINATION. THEY WOULD NOT GRAB THE THREADS OF A NAIL. THERE WAS A GASH IN THE THREADS.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 22197739 ↗
• MalfunctionMar 4, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Twisted/Bent; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Twisted/Bent

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN REMOVING A TFNA, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE TFNA EXTRACTION INSTRUMENTS THREADS WERE DAMAGED SO IT COULD NOT BE USED APPROPRIATELY. IT TOOK TIME TO GET TO FUNCTION AS REQUIRED.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 21514824 ↗
• MalfunctionDec 5, 2024Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING ROUTINE MEDICAL DEVICE REPROCESSING, MEDICAL DEVICE REPROCESSING STAFF IDENTIFIED THAT THE THREADS OF COMPLAINED ITEM WERE STRIPPED. THE DEVICE WAS DEEMED TO BE NO LONGER FUNCTIONAL AND THE ITEM WAS SUBSEQUENTLY DISCARDED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCE.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 20853473 ↗
• MalfunctionOct 7, 2024Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE REMOVAL OF A TFNA OCCURRED WHERE THE EXTRACTOR WAS CROSS THREADED, SO A TFN EXTRACTOR WAS USED. THE HELICAL BLADE EXTRACTOR FROM TFN WAS USED DUE TO THE TFNA BLADE EXTRACTOR BEING DROPPED. THE BLADE WAS COLD WELDED. THE FLEXIBLE SCREWDRIVER WAS CROSS THREADED WHILE UNLOCKING SET SCREW. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY DUE TO THE REPORTED EVENT. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY AND IF FRAGMENTS WERE GENERATED OR NOT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 20385152 ↗
• MalfunctionOct 4, 2024Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON AN UNKNOWN DATE DURING SURGERY, THE NAIL EXTRACTOR HAD DAMAGED THREADS. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED AND THE PROCEDURE CONTINUED. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO PATIENT.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 20373720 ↗
• MalfunctionSep 26, 2024Break; Break

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING EXTRACTION OF A NAIL ON (B)(6) 2024, THE NAIL EXTRACTOR SHEARED OFF AT THE JUNCTION WITH THE INSERTION HANDLE. SURGERY COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY, NO FURTHER PROBLEMS REPORTED. THIS REPORT IS FOR A NAIL EXTRACTOR.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 20311004 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 4, 2024Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Twisted/Bent; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Twisted/Bent

  IT WAS REPORTED INTRAOPERATIVELY ON (B)(6) 2024, THE THREADS WERE NO LONGER ENGAGING IN NAIL HEAD WHICH COMPLICATES NAIL EXTRACTIONS AND CANNOT BE USED. IT WAS STATED THE NAIL WAS NOT THE ISSUE. PROCEDURE AND PATIENT OUTCOME WERE UNKNOWN. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE NAIL EXTRACTOR FOR (B)(4).

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 19042422 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 4, 2024Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Twisted/Bent; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Twisted/Bent

  IT WAS REPORTED INTRAOPERATIVELY ON (B)(6) 2024, THE THREADS WERE NO LONGER ENGAGING IN NAIL HEAD WHICH COMPLICATES NAIL EXTRACTIONS AND CANNOT BE USED. IT WAS STATED THE NAIL WAS NOT THE ISSUE. PROCEDURE AND PATIENT OUTCOME WERE UNKNOWN. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE NAIL EXTRACTOR FOR (B)(4).

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 19042383 ↗
• MalfunctionNov 6, 2023Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Device-Device Incompatibility; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Device-Device Incompatibility

  DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN JAPAN AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2023, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REMOVAL SURGERY OF TFNA IMPLANTS. THE SURGEON COMPLAINED THAT IT WAS VERY DIFFICULT TO TELL WHICH CONNECTION WAS CLOCKWISE OR COUNTERCLOCKWISE FOR THE EXTRACT-INSTR F/NAILS AND EXTRACT-INSTR F/TFNA HELICAL BLADE+SCR. THE SURGEON ALSO COMMENTED AS FOLLOWS: IN THE TEXT OF THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE, THERE IS NO DISTINCTION MADE BETWEEN WHETHER THE REMOVAL SCREW IS ATTACHED TO THE NAIL OR THE BLADE. IN THE EXPLANATORY DIAGRAM, THE NAIL REMOVAL SCREW IS FIRST FOLLOWED BY THE BLADE REMOVAL SCREW, BUT THE TEXT IS WRITTEN IN THE REVERSE ORDER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO SURGICAL DELAY THIS REPORT INVOLVES ONE (1) NAIL EXTRACTOR. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 1 FOR (B)(4).

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 18073213 ↗
• MalfunctionNov 3, 2023Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

  IT WAS REPORTED ON (B)(6) 2023, WHEN TRYING TO REMOVE AN OLD TFNA IT WAS FOUND THAT ONE OF THE SETS NAIL EXTRACTION SCREWS WAS STRIPPED. THE STAFF ALSO HAD A DIFFICULT TIME REMOVING THE HELICAL BLADE EXTRACTOR FROM THE REMOVED HELICAL BLADE AND BROKE THE TOOL IN THE PROCESS. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO SURGICAL DELAY. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OUTCOMES OR CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) NAIL EXTRACTOR THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 2 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 18066229 ↗
• MalfunctionOct 31, 2023Material Deformation; Material Deformation

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRODUCT IS FULL AND WILL NOT CUT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OUTCOMES OR CONSEQUENCES. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) NAIL EXTRACTOR THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 1 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 18037944 ↗
• MalfunctionSep 15, 2023Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2023, DURING POSTOPERATIVE INSPECTION OF A SET, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE NAIL EXTRACTION AND HAMMER GUIDE WERE COLD-WELDED TOGETHER. THE OTHER INSTRUMENTS WERE NOTED TO BE DEFORMED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1)NAIL EXTRACTOR. THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 4 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 17754997 ↗
• MalfunctionSep 7, 2023Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem

  DEVICE REPORT FROM AUSTRIA REPORTS AN EVENT AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TROCHANTERIC FIXATION NAIL ADVANCED (TFNA) REMOVAL ON (B)(4) 2023, THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH AN EXTRACTION INSTRUMENT. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A DELAY OF TEN MINUTES. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCE. UPON MANUFACTURER INVESTIGATION, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE THREADS ON THE TIP OF THE EXTRACTION INSTRUMENT WAS OBSERVED STRIPPED. THIS REPORT IS FOR A NAIL EXTRACTOR. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 1 FOR (B)(4).

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 17698854 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 13, 2023Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2023, THE SURGEON REMOVED A TFNA NAIL AND REVISED WITH ANOTHER TFNA NAIL. THE SURGEON HAD DIFFICULTIES CONNECTING THE NAIL EXTRACTOR LIKELY DUE TO THE SET SCREW BEING TOO FAR BACK, TOO MUCH SOFT TISSUE INSIDE OF NAIL, BLOCKED BY OTHER STRUCTURES FROM BEING COLLINEAR TO ALLOW EXTRACTOR TO CONNECT. THE SURGEON CONNECTED THE AIMING ARM FOR EXTRACTION AND IT WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED. THE EXTRACTOR WAS CHECKED POST OPERATIVELY AND IT DID SUCCESSFULLY CONNECT TO THE NAIL, THEREFORE, IT WAS LIKELY BLOCKED BY OTHER STRUCTURES. CURRENTLY, THERE IS NO PLAN TO RETURN THE EXTRACTOR UNLESS NEEDED. THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY OF 5 MIN. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY AND THERE WERE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES/OUTCOMES. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1)NAIL EXTRACTOR THIS IS REPORT 3 OF 3 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 16736783 ↗
• MalfunctionJan 24, 2023Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON JANUARY 1, 2023, THE TFNA NAIL EXTRACTOR THREADS WERE STRIPPED. THIS WAS FOUND IN THE STERILE PROCESSING DEPARTMENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. THIS REPORT INVOLVES ONE NAIL EXTRACTOR. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 1 FOR (B)(4).

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 16232076 ↗
• MalfunctionJan 23, 2023Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2023 IT WAS DISCOVERED IN THE STERILE PROCESSING DEPARTMENT, STRIPPED THREADS ON THE NAIL EXTRACTION BOLT. THE EVENT OCCURRED INTRA-OP, BUT SPECIFIC CASE WAS UNKNOWN. THIS SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT ANY SURGICAL DELAY. PATIENT OUTCOME WAS UNKNOWN. THIS COMPLAIN INVOLVES ONE (1) DEVICE. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) NAIL EXTRACTOR THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 1 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 16229569 ↗
• MalfunctionJun 30, 2022Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

  DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6), 2022, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REMOVAL SURGERY OF THE TFNA LONG NAIL. AFTER EXTRACTING AN END CAP, THE SURGEON TRIED TO ATTACH THE EXTRACTOR TO THE NAIL, BUT IT TOOK SOME TIME SINCE THE SURGEON HAD A DIFFICULTY IN ATTACHING. ALTHOUGH IT TOOK TIME IN ATTACHING, THE SURGEON SUCCEEDED IN ATTACHING THE EXTRACTOR TO THE NAIL AND COULD EXTRACT THE NAIL EVENTUALLY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHIN 30 MINUTES DELAY. THE SURGEON ASKED THE SALES REP THAT THE SHORT TIP OF THE EXTRACTOR MIGHT MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO ATTACH TO THE NAIL, AND THE SALES REP EXPLAINED THAT THE TIP OF THE EXTRACTOR WAS SHORT BECAUSE A NAIL HAS A LOCKING MECHANISM. THE SURGEON ALSO ASKED IF IT WAS DIFFICULT TO ATTACH THE EXTRACTOR BECAUSE THE THREAD ON THE EXTRACTOR WAS SHORT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. THIS COMPLAINT INVOLVES ONE (1) DEVICE EXTRACT-INSTR F/NAILS CANN. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 1 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 14875542 ↗
• MalfunctionMay 24, 2022Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

  DEVICE REPORT FROM DEPUY SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: THIS IS REPORT 3 OF 3 FOR (B)(4). IT WAS REPORTED BY THE SALES REP IN UNITED KINGDOM THAT THE DEPTH GAUGE DEVICE HAD WEAR AND TEAR. THERE WAS NO PROCEDURE NOR PATIENT INVOLVEMENT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) EXTRACT-INSTR F/NAILS CANN DEVICE.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 14487726 ↗
• MalfunctionMar 1, 2022Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

  DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6), 2022, THE SURGEON INDICATED THAT THE THREADS ON TWO TFNA EXTRACTION INSTRUMENTS WERE STRIPPED AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE INSTRUMENTS IN QUESTION ARE THE NAIL EXTRACTOR AND THE SCREW/BLADE EXTRACTOR. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES. THIS REPORT INVOLVES ONE (1) NAIL EXTRACTOR. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 2 FOR (B)(4).

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 13636596 ↗
• MalfunctionDec 29, 2021Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT IS SCHEDULED FOR TFNA REVISE DUE TO FRACTURE DISPLACEMENT. DURING EXTRACTION THE NAIL WAS VERY DIFFICULT TO CONNECT THE EXTRACTOR. THE SET SCREW WAS BACK OUT ENOUGH TO REMOVE THE LAG SCREW AND THE SMITH AND NEPHEW CONICAL EXTRACTOR WAS CONNECTED AND THE NAIL WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THERE WAS A PATIENT CONSEQUENCE REPORTED. THIS COMPLAINT INVOLVES THREE (3) DEVICES. THIS REPORT IS FOR (1) NAIL EXTRACTOR THIS REPORT IS 2 OF 3 FOR PC-(B)(4) RELATED PRODUCT COMPLAINT: PC-(B)(4).

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 13113587 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K131548. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

• Z-1239-2024 · Jan 24, 2024 · Open, Classified
  TFNA Femoral Nail 9mm, right, 130, L 235mm-Intended for temporary fixation and stabilization of proximal femur fractures. Part Number: 04.037.944S
• Z-1240-2024 · Jan 24, 2024 · Open, Classified
  TFNA Femoral Nail 11mm, right, 130, L 235mm-Intended for temporary fixation and stabilization of proximal femur fractures. Part Number: 04.037.144S
• Z-1248-2023 · Feb 1, 2023 · Open, Classified
  TFN-Advanced Femoral Nail 12MM/130 DEG TI CANN TFNA 170MM STERILE. Intended for temporary fixation and stabilization of proximal femur fractures Part Number: 04.037.242S
• Z-1246-2023 · Feb 1, 2023 · Open, Classified
  TFN-Advanced Femoral Nail 12MM/125 DEG TI CANN TFNA 200MM STERILE. Intended for temporary fixation and stabilization of proximal femur fractures. Part Number: 04.037.213S
• Z-1247-2023 · Feb 1, 2023 · Open, Classified
  TFN-Advanced Femoral Nail 12MM/125 DEG TI CANN TFNA 170MM - STERILE. Intended for temporary fixation and stabilization of proximal femur fractures. Part Number: 04.037.212S
• Z-0126-2016 · Sep 21, 2015 · Terminated
  Synthes Screw Inserter; for use with Intramedullary Rod, orthopedic device. Used to secure the head element to the head element inserter to prevent disengagement during head eleme
• Z-2091-2015 · Jun 10, 2015 · Terminated
  Helical Blade Inserter for Trochanteric Fixation Nail-ADVANCED (TFNA); intended to secure the head element to the head element inserter to prevent disengagement during head element
• Z-1600-2015 · Apr 9, 2015 · Terminated
  TFN-ADVANCED Proximal Femoral Nailing System (TFNA); for treatment of fractures in orthopedics and trauma.
• Z-1352-2015 · Feb 24, 2015 · Terminated
  Synthes 130 Degree Aiming Arm and 125 Degree Aiming Arm; The 130 Degree Aiming Arm and 125 Degree Aiming Arm are a part of the TFN-ADVANCED (TFNA) System. The TFN-ADVANCED Proxima