SonoLong Curl Echo 521188-34CRecalls & reported problems
Pajunk GmbH Medizintechnologie · SonoLong Curl Echo SonoLong NanoLine cannula 18G x 100mm with Tuohy tip and · Class 2
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 14048223020385), received between Jan 4, 2018 and Jan 4, 2018 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Handling Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Handling Problem1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 4, 2018Device Handling Problem; Device Handling Problem
(B)(4). FROM INITIAL REPORTER: (B)(6) CLINIC WAS GIVEN TO A PATIENT RECTUS SHEET BLOCK ON BOTH SIDES AFTER A GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY FOR PAIN MANAGEMENT ON (B)(6) 2017 WITH PAJUNK SONOLONG CURL ECHO CATHETERS PURCHASED FROM MEDIQ (B)(4). THE PROCEDURE WENT SMOOTHLY. ON (B)(6) 2017 CATHETERS WERE REMOVED FROM THE UPPER ABDOMEN. THE NURSE REMOVED THE SECOND CATHETER WITHOUT ANY PROBLEMS, BUT IN ANOTHER CATHETER THERE SEEMED TO BE A RESISTANCE. WHEN PULLING THE CATHETER, IT REALLY FELT A RESISTANCE AND MILD PAIN IN THE UPPER ABDOMEN, AND PULLING THE CATHETER CONTINUED UNTIL THE WHITE CATHETER CAME OUT OF THE SKIN. FROM THE INSIDE OF THE CATHETER APPEARED A FRUSTRATED METAL WIRE-LIKE LINE THAT STRETCHED AND STRETCHED UNTIL IT BROKE. THERE WAS APPARENTLY THE CATHETER'S HEAD IN THE PATIENT BECAUSE THE BLACK POINT ON THE TIP WAS MISSING FROM THE OUT COMING CATHETER. THERE WAS ALSO LEFT AN UNKNOWN NUMBER OF STEEL HELICAL COIL IN THE PATIENT. IT WAS SUSPECTED THAT THE CATHETER'S HEAD WOULD HAVE GONE INTO NODE BECAUSE THE INJECTION SITE WAS SUCH THAT THE CATHETER WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO STICK TO ANY STRUCTURE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 7163625 ↗
Other Anesthesia conduction kit devices
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405671Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall68 reports
- ARROW IPN922678Teleflex Incorporated · Anesthesia conduction kit2 recalls0 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405672Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall27 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405673Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall10 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405637Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall7 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405707Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall4 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405735Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall3 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405609Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page