Portex NEPINLD15248C22/25Recalls & reported problems
Icu Medical, Inc. · Class 2
All models of Portex (409)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 15019517115581), received between Mar 7, 2019 and Mar 7, 2019 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
7 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K965017); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- Infiltration into Tissue1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 7, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT WHEN AN EXPERIENCED CRNA WAS REMOVING A SMITHS MEDICAL PORTEX SPINAL TRAY SPINAL NEEDLE FROM A PATIENT, THE NEEDLE BROKE OFF AT THE HUB. THE IMAGE OF THE NEEDLE "DID NOT SHOW UP WELL ON FLUOROSCOPY" AND THE PHYSICIAN STATED "THE TIP MAY HAVE BEEN STUCK IN THE BONE OR BETWEEN VERTEBRAE". SUBSEQUENTLY, SURGICAL REMOVAL OF THE NEEDLE WAS REQUIRED. IT WAS NOTED THE NEEDLE "GOT PRETTY DEEP AND HAD MOVED CONSIDERABLY". NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Infiltration into Tissue
MAUDE report 8402289 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K965017. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1101-2026 · Dec 19, 2025 · Open, ClassifiedPortex Spinal Tray, Item No. A3729-24 A3595
- Z-0211-2007 · Oct 27, 2006 · TerminatedPortex Continuous Epidural tray Ref 4948-17
- Z-0244-06 · Nov 17, 2005 · Terminated4904 Glass L.O.R. Syringe
- Z-0243-06 · Nov 17, 2005 · Terminated4903 Glass L.O.R. Syringe
- Z-0245-06 · Nov 17, 2005 · Terminated4950-16 Portex Epidural Mini-pack
- Z-0242-06 · Nov 17, 2005 · Terminated4902 Glass L.O.R. Syringe
- Z-0166-04 · Oct 10, 2003 · TerminatedPortex Spinal Tray with 25G Whitacre Needle. Kit contains Bupivacaine in Dextrose, Epinephrine,Lidocaine, Lidocaine in Dextrose and Tetracaine Catalog Number: 15545-20
Other Anesthesia conduction kit devices
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405671Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall68 reports
- ARROW IPN922678Teleflex Incorporated · Anesthesia conduction kit2 recalls0 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405672Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall27 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405673Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall10 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405637Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall7 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405707Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall4 reports
- BD Glaspak 405675Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall3 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405609Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page