ATEC 0914-20MRRecalls & reported problems
Hologic, Inc. · 9G (3.7MM) X 14CM, 20MM HANDPIECE-MR · Class 2
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Hologic ATEC biopsy handpiece is used to take tissue samples. The 25 reports that name its identifier mostly describe contamination of the device, with 2 mentioning material left in the patient. The reports mention no deaths and 8 injuries, and no recalls name this device. Reports rose to 19 in the last 12 months compared with 2 in the prior 12 months.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 17
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 10
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 17 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 15420045504899), received between May 5, 2021 and Sep 21, 2026 — classified as 10 injuries, 7 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Contamination” (4 reports).
4 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K042290); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem7
- Contamination4
- Failure to Obtain Sample2
- Component Missing1
- Material Deformation1
- Material Twisted/Bent1
- Mechanical Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions12
- Insufficient Information3
- Foreign Body In Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 17 most recent of 17 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 21, 2026Contamination
It was reported by the user site that the lot was "deemed contaminated with black specks on spike that is inserted into patient's saline." The issue was identified prior to patient use and the device was removed from service. No patient or user harm was reported, and no additional medical or surgical intervention was required.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50842332 ↗InjurySep 21, 2026Failure to Obtain Sample
It was reported by the user site that, "There was no suction at the time of "[the]" biopsy. "[We]" had to dispose the needle and use a new one." Additional information was obtained from the user site in which it was confirmed that "A new needle package was opened and used." The user further reported that "there was a new needle insertion at the site of the biopsy." No patient/user harm was reported.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50841356 ↗MalfunctionSep 21, 2026Contamination
It was reported by the user site that "The connecting part of the canister that holds the specimen was damaged. It had a substance that coated the outside of the canister." The issue was identified prior to the procedure and prior to patient use. The procedure was completed successfully using another device. No patient or user harm was reported, and no additional medical or surgical intervention was required.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50841179 ↗MalfunctionSep 21, 2026Contamination
It was reported by the user site that the "Outside of specimen cup was very sticky/greasy." Customer outreach confirmed that "It may very well have been excessive device lubricant but I cannot confirm." The issue was identified prior to patient use and the device was removed from service. No patient or user harm was reported, and no additional medical or surgical intervention was required.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50840941 ↗MalfunctionSep 21, 2026Contamination
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50840782 ↗InjuryJul 27, 2026Failure to Obtain Sample
It was reported that during a breast biopsy that the customer lost the samples as there was no filter in the specimen chamber. There was no reported harm and the procedure was able to be successfully completed with another device. However, customer outreach confirmed that losing the samples resulted in the "additional samples needed to be obtained by the radiologist."
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50045701 ↗InjuryMay 5, 2026Component Missing
THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED BY THE USER AFTER AN ATEC BREAST BIOPSY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026, "WE PERFORMED A 3-SITE BIOPSY ON THIS PATIENT. WHEN WE WERE DONE, WE OPENED THE CONTAINER TO PULL OUT THE BASKET WITH THE SAMPLE IN IT. THERE WAS NO BASKET IN THE DEVICE CONTAINER. AND NO SAMPLE AS WELL. THE OTHER 2 BIOPSY SITES WERE DONE SUCCESSFULLY, AND BASKETS WERE IN THOSE DEVICES." ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE USER SITE IN WHICH IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE THIRD BIOPSY SITE COULD NOT BE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. FURTHER, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT IS NOT CURRENTLY SCHEDULED TO RETURN FOR COMPLETION OF THE BIOPSY ON THE THIRD SITE; HOWEVER, PATHOLOGY MAY POSSIBLY BE OBTAINED ON THAT SITE DURING AN UPCOMING BREAST SURGERY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25082707 ↗MalfunctionApr 22, 2026Material Twisted/Bent
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE USER SITE THAT POST A BREAST BIOPSY PROCEDURE USING AN ATEC BREAST BIOPSY DEVICE, "THE COVER OVER THE TROUGH DID NOT CLOSE PROPERLY OR AUTOMATICALLY AND SEEMED TO BE ANGLED UPWARDS." ADDITIONALLY, IT WAS REPORTED THAT "THE NEEDLE WAS HARD TO REMOVE, AND THE NURSE HAD TO PUSH ON THE BASE OF THE NEEDLE IN ORDER TO GET IT TO CLOSE." NO PATIENT OR USER HARM WAS REPORTED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE SAME DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24955763 ↗InjuryNov 24, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PLASTIC SHEATH ON AN ATEC DEVICE GETS STUCK ON THE PATIENT'S SKIN AND TISSUE REQUIRING A LARGE INCISION. IT IS REPORTED THAT THE USER HAS STARTED PLACING THE DEVICE TO THE CORRECT DEPTH WITH THE TROCAR, REMOVING THE TROCAR, PUTTING IN THE OBTURATOR, AND PUSHING IT UNTIL IT ACTUALLY GOES THROUGH THE SKIN INSTEAD OF TENTING, AND THEN PULLING BACK. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23632973 ↗InjuryNov 24, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PLASTIC SHEATH ON AN ATEC DEVICE GETS STUCK ON THE PATIENT'S SKIN AND TISSUE, REQUIRING A LARGE INCISION. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DESPITE GOOD COMPRESSION AND AN ADEQUATE INITIAL SKIN INCISION, THE INCISION NEEDED TO BE ELONGATED FOR THE DEVICE TO PENETRATE THROUGH THE SKIN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23632909 ↗InjuryNov 24, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PLASTIC SHEATH AN ATEC DEVICE GETS STUCK TO THE PATIENT'S SKIN AND TISSUE, REQUIRING A LARGER SKIN INCISION. IT IS REPORTED THAT THE END OF THE SHEATH DOES NOT SEEM SMOOTH. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23632864 ↗InjuryMay 15, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ATEC PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025, AN ARTIFACT WAS OBSERVED IN THE PATIENT'S BREAST AFTER AN MRI BIOPSY IN ADDITION TO THE TRIMARKTD-2S-13-MR MARKER THAT WAS DEPLOYED AT THE TIME. IT IS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY; HOWEVER, THE CUSTOMER REPORTS THAT THE PATIENT REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 22029993 ↗InjuryMay 15, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ATEC PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025, AN ARTIFACT WAS OBSERVED IN THE PATIENT'S BREAST AFTER AN MRI BIOPSY IN ADDITION TO THE SMARK-M-SS2 MARKER THAT WAS DEPLOYED AT THE TIME. IT IS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY; HOWEVER, THE CUSTOMER REPORTS THAT THE PATIENT REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 22029992 ↗InjuryDec 7, 2022Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2022, AN ATEC PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AND THE DEVICE WOULD NOT FUNCTION WHEN INSERTED INTO SITE. PROCEDURE WAS NOT COMPLETED, A MARKER WAS PLACED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS THEN COMPLETED UNDER MAMMO. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15936369 ↗MalfunctionDec 2, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2022 A ATEC PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AND THE CONSOLE DID NOT WORK DURING THE PROCEDURE AND WHILE THE PATIENT WAS ALREADY AT THE TABLE WITH THE BREAST COMPRESSED FOR BIOPSY. IT HAD FLASHING GREEN LIGHT. THE PHYSICIAN TRIED ALL TROUBLESHOOTING TECHNIQUES LISTED ON THE CHART, AND EVEN CHANGED THE BIOPSY NEEDLE TWICE. PATIENT IS NOT YET RESCHEDULED FOR A NEW PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15911324 ↗MalfunctionDec 2, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2022 A ATEC PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AND THE CONSOLE DID NOT WORK DURING THE PROCEDURE AND WHILE THE PATIENT WAS ALREADY AT THE TABLE WITH THE BREAST COMPRESSED FOR BIOPSY. IT HAD FLASHING GREEN LIGHT. THE PHYSICIAN TRIED ALL TROUBLESHOOTING TECHNIQUES LISTED ON THE CHART, AND EVEN CHANGED THE BIOPSY NEEDLE TWICE. PATIENT IS NOT YET RESCHEDULED FOR A NEW PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15910265 ↗MalfunctionMay 5, 2021Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BIOPSY THE USER NOTICED THE PLASTIC SHEATH WAS DIFFICULT TO REMOVE AND A PIECE OF IT HAD BROKEN OFF. NO INJURY REPORTED. THE REPORTED DEVICE WAS DISCARDED BY THE CUSTOMER. THE CUSTOMER HAS NOT REPORTED ANY SIMILAR ISSUES SINCE THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11778522 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K042290. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2285-2010 · Aug 11, 2010 · TerminatedSuros ATEC 0912-20 Breast Biopsy and Excision System Handpiece, REF ATEC0912-12, sterile, Hologic, Inc. 6100 Technology Center Drive Indianapolis, IN. The handpiece is inserted i
- Z-1160-2010 · Feb 1, 2010 · TerminatedATEC 0909-12 Breast Biopsy and Excision System , 9 gauge, 9 centimeter handpiece (part number 0909-12), Rx, Sterile, Suros Surgical Systems, Inc. 6100 Technology Center DR. India
- Z-0275-2009 · Sep 22, 2008 · TerminatedATEC Breast Biopsy and Excision System 12 gauge, 20 centimeter handpiece, sterile, Hologic, Inc., Indianapolis, IN; Model number ATEC 1212-20. Intended for partial or complete rem
- Z-0362-2007 · Dec 15, 2006 · TerminatedSuros ATEC Breast Biopsy System handpiece (9 gauge cannula 12 centimeters in length with a 20 millimeter aperture) for use with the ATEC Breast Biopsy and Excision System, disposab
Other INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY devices
- MAX-CORE MC1616Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY1 recall4,258 reports
- ENCOR® ECP017GSenorx, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY1 recall4,186 reports
- MAX-CORE MC1820Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY1 recall2,404 reports
- MAX-CORE MC1816Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY1 recall1 death848 reports
- MAX-CORE MC1410Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY1 recall399 reports
- MAX-CORE MC1610Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY1 recall394 reports
- ENCOR® ECP0110GVSenorx, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY392 reports
- ENCOR® ECP0110GSenorx, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY390 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page