CHIMAERA Hip Fracture System 1 (REF 99-T93785)Recalls & reported problems
Orthofix Srl · CHIMAERA HFS LAG SCREW SLIDING L85MM STERILE · Class 2
All models of CHIMAERA Hip Fracture System (16)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 18054242514732), received between Jun 20, 2017 and Nov 20, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Mechanical Problem” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Mechanical Problem3
- Unintended Ejection1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Code Available1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 20, 2025Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
RECEIVED INFORMATION STATING THAT A CHIMAERA LAG SCREW FIXED DID NOT LOCK INTO THE NAIL. A SIMILAR SCREW WITH DIFFERENT LENGTH WAS USED TO COMPLETE SURGERY. AS PER REPORTER SURGICAL PROCEDURE WAS DELAYED BY APPROXIMATELY 50 MINUTES. THE PATIENT IS REPORTED AS BEING IN OBSERVATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23606405 ↗InjuryJul 16, 2020Unintended Ejection; Mechanical Problem; Unintended Ejection; Mechanical Problem
THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE HOSPITAL INDICATES: HOSPITAL NAME: (B)(6); SURGEON NAME: (B)(6); DATE OF THE INCIDENT: (B)(6), 2020; PATIENT INFORMATION: 80 YEAR-OLD, INITIALS: (B)(6); INCIDENT DESCRIPTION: "AFTER LOCKING OF THE CEPHALIC SCREW ON THE NAIL, IT WAS OBSERVED THE BACKING OUT OF THE CEPHALIC SCREW FROM THE NAIL. THE CEPHALIC SCREW DID NOT LOCK ON THE NAIL". ACTION TAKEN: "THE NAIL AND THE CEPHALIC SCREW WERE REMOVED; ANOTHER INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL WAS USED. THERE WAS A DELAY IN THE SURGICAL TIME". THE DEVICE IS AVAILABLE FOR THE INVESTIGATION. FURTHER INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE HOSPITAL THROUGH THE TERRITORY MANAGER: - BODY PART TO WHICH DEVICE WAS APPLIED: FEMUR - SURGERY DESCRIPTION: FRACTURE TREATMENT - PATIENT'S DETAILS: 88 YEAR-OLD, MALE, PREVIOUS HEALTH CONDITION: GOOD GENERAL CONDITION - EVENT DESCRIPTION: DURING THE POSITIONING OF THE CEPHALIC SCREW, THE SCREW DID NOT ENGAGE THE NAIL. SCREW AND NAIL WERE REPLACED WITH ANOTHER IMPLANT. - THE DEVICE FAILURE HAD NO ADVERSE EFFECTS ON PATIENT - THE INITIAL SURGERY WAS NOT COMPLETED WITH THE DEVICE - THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH A GAMMA 3 NAIL FROM ANOTHER COMPANY - THE EVENT LED TO A DELAY IN THE DURATION OF THE S
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10282357 ↗InjuryJun 20, 2017Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTOR INDICATES: HOSPITAL NAME: (B)(6); SURGEON NAME: DR. (B)(6); DATE OF SURGERY: 6 WEEKS AGO; BODY PART TO WHICH DEVICE WAS APPLIED: HIP; SURGERY DESCRIPTION: FRACTURE TREATMENT; PATIENT INFORMATION: NO RESPONSE PROVIDED; PROBLEM OBSERVED DURING: NO RESPONSE PROVIDED; TYPE OF PROBLEM: NO RESPONSE PROVIDED. EVENT DESCRIPTION: AFTER HIP FRACTURE AFTER 6 WEEKS, CUT OUT WITH CHIMAERA, IT SEEMS THAT THE LAG SCREW DIDN'T WORK.....NO DYNAMISATION.......I HAVE THE IMPLANT WITH ME AND WILL SEND THE PICTURES WITH, TELL ME IF I CAN SEND YOU THE IMPLANTS. DR (B)(6) HAD TO REMOVE AND CHANGE WITH TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT. THE COMPLAINT REPORT FORM ALSO INDICATES: THE DEVICE FAILURE HAD ADVERSE EFFECTS ON PATIENT; THE INITIAL SURGERY WAS NOT COMPLETED WITH THE DEVICE; AN ADDITIONAL SURGERY WAS REQUIRED; AVAILABILITY ABOUT COPIES OF THE OPERATIVE REPORTS: NO RESPONSE PROVIDED; COPIES OF THE X-RAYS IMAGES ARE AVAILABLE; INFORMATION ABOUT PATIENT CURRENT HEALTH CONDITION: NO RESPONSE PROVIDED. MANUFACTURER REFERENCE NUMBER: (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 6653608 ↗
Other Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories devices
- NA 03.033.001Synthes GmbH · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES265 reports
- GAMMA 3125-1180SStryker GmbH · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES249 reports
- NA 03.037.026Synthes GmbH · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES225 reports
- PRECICE® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSC5-075Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls2 reports
- PRECICE® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSC5-045Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls1 report
- PRECICE® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSC5-050Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls1 report
- TRIGEN 71674067Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES201 reports
- PRECICE Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSB5-040Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page