Skip to content

CHIMAERA Hip Fracture System 1 (REF 193337)Recalls & reported problems

Orthofix Srl · SCREW EXTRACTOR SIZE 4 - 9MM · Class 2

All models of CHIMAERA Hip Fracture System (16)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 18056099649216), received between Feb 23, 2021 and Apr 20, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Mechanical Problem” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 2 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Mechanical Problem3
  • Break2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Oversedation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 20, 2026Mechanical Problem

    RECEIVED INFORMATION STATING THAT DURING REMOVAL OF A CHIMAERA IMPLANT, THE NAIL EXTRACTOR GOT CROSS THREADED IN THE LAG SCREW. IT WAS POSSIBLE TO FINALIZE THE SURGERY, WITH A DELAY OF 30 MINUTES. PATIENT/USER NOT AFFECTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24930307 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 17, 2026Mechanical Problem

    Received information stating that during removal of a chimaera implant, the nail extractor got cross threaded in the lag screw. It was possible to finalize the surgery, with a delay of 30 minutes.Patient/user not affected.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24909536 ↗
  • InjuryDec 23, 2025Break; Break

    RECEIVED INFORMATION STATING THAT DURING THE REMOVAL OF A CHIMAERA NAIL, THE NAIL EXTRACTOR BROKE INSIDE THE CEPHALIC SCREW. THIS LED TO AN EXTENSION OF SURGERY TIME OF TWO HOURS.THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED IN GOOD CONDITION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23875741 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 23, 2021Break; Mechanical Problem; Break; Mechanical Problem

    THE INFORMATION INITIALLY PROVIDED BY THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTOR INDICATED: PRODUCT CODE: (B)(4) (SCREW EXTRACTOR SIZE 4-9 MM), BATCH NUMBER: G190645, QUANTITY: 1, DATE OF SURGERY: (B)(6) 2020, BODY PART TO WHICH DEVICE WAS APPLIED: FEMUR, SURGERY DESCRIPTION: FRACTURE TREATMENT, PATIENT'S INFORMATION:NOT APPLICABLE, PROBLEM OBSERVED DURING: ON SCHEDULED DEVICE REMOVAL, TYPE OF PROBLEM: DEVICE FUNCTIONAL PROBLEM, EVENT DESCRIPTION: "CASE WAS FOR CHIMAERA REMOVAL: WE ASSUMED THE THREADING OF THE MAIN CHIMAERA LAG SCREW WAS DAMAGED AS THE NORMAL SCREW DRIVER COULD NOT ENGAGE INTO THE THREAD, THIS PROBABLY OCCURRED WHEN IT WAS INSERTED. THE SURGEON THEN HAD TO REVERT TO THE SCREW EXTRACTOR TOOL (193337) FOR REMOVAL OF THE MAIN LAG SCREW. AS THE EXTRACTION INSTRUMENT HAS A REVERSE THREAD INTERFACE, ENGAGING IT INTO THE LAG SCREW AND THEN ALSO DISENGAGING THE LAG SCREW FROM THE NAIL. THE PROBLEM WE FACE IS THAT ONCE THE SCREW IS REMOVED, THE SCREW CANNOT BE REMOVED FROM THE EXTRACTOR TOOL RESULTING IN A BROKEN TIP WHEN WE DO SO". THE COMPLAINT REPORT FORM ALSO INDICATED: THE DEVICE FAILURE HAD ADVERSE EFFECTS ON PATIENT (UN-RETRIEVED DEVICE FRAGMENTS - THE PATIENT WAS IN SURGERY FOR ALMOST 3

    Patient problems: Oversedation

    MAUDE report 11364101 ↗

Other Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories devices

All Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page