Skip to content

SPINAL STIM 5212Recalls & reported problems

Orthofix US LLC · Osteogenesis Stimulator, SPININAL STIM US · Class 2

Adverse event reports
11
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
11
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 18257200105670), received between Nov 22, 2017 and Jun 26, 2026 — classified as 11 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 2 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 2 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 2 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information5
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
  • Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation1
  • No Apparent Adverse Event1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Burn(s)4
  • Burning Sensation1
  • Dysuria1
  • Muscle Weakness/Atrophy1
  • Pain1
  • Shock from Patient Lead(s)1
  • Skin Burning Sensation1
  • Skin Inflammation/ Irritation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 26, 2026No Apparent Adverse Event

    MEWATCH REPORT RECEIVED STATING THE PATIENT REPORTED A REACTION THAT IRRITATED THEIR WHOLE CHEST. THE ISSUE BEGAN THEY WOULD SAY AROUND AUGUST.

    Patient problems: Skin Inflammation/ Irritation

    MAUDE report 25641511 ↗
  • InjuryApr 29, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT REPORTED SCABBING BURN MARKS AND CALLUS MARKS HAVE DEVELOPED ON THE LOWER BACK AND REPORTED THE AREA BEING TENDER AFTER TREATING. PATIENT DISCONTINUED USE OF THE DEVICE.

    Patient problems: Burn(s)

    MAUDE report 25035459 ↗
  • InjuryApr 1, 2026Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPRTED THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING PAIN IN HIS HIPS, LEGS, AND FEET AFTER STARTING TREATMENT ON (B)(6) 25. AFTER A FOLLOW UP CALL 3/26/2026 THE PATIENT REPORTED THE DEVICE CAUSED A NERVE TO FEEL HOT AND PAINFUL. THE PATIENT IS WORKING WITH HIS DOCTOR AND SEEKING ADDITIONAL TREATMENT.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 24753593 ↗
  • InjuryDec 17, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PATIENT REPORTED THAT BLADDER FUNCTION WAS LOST DURING DEVICE TREATMENT PLAN AFTER 4 TIMES OF USE. PATIENT HAD A CATHETER INSERTED AND AFTER 7 DAYS, IT WAS REMOVED BUT PATIENT COULD NOT URINATE WITHOUT CATHETER. ANOTHER CATHETER WAS INSERTED FOR 10 DAYS AND ONCE REMOVED, PATIENT COULD URINATE BUT HAD NO BLADDER CONTROL. PATIENT DISCONTINUED USE OF DEVICE AS ADVISED MY PHYSICIAN.

    Patient problems: Dysuria; Unspecified Kidney or Urinary Problem

    MAUDE report 23835261 ↗
  • InjuryDec 8, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PATIENT REPORTED FEELING THE DEVICE AND BODY WAS GETTING WARM AFTER AN HOUR OF TREATMENT. PATIENT REPORTED NOTICING IT TWO WEEKS AFTER INITIAL TREATMENTS STARTED. THE SENSATION WENT AWAY AFTER STOPPING TREATMENT AND ALSO MENTIONED REFLUX WITH SIMILAR ONSET OF TREATING WITH THE DEVICE.

    Patient problems: Skin Burning Sensation

    MAUDE report 23743339 ↗
  • InjuryOct 21, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    PATIENT SENT AN EMAIL REPORTING SHE BELIEVES THE DEVICE CAUSED BURNS ON HER BACK. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Burn(s)

    MAUDE report 23350620 ↗
  • InjurySep 11, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    PATIENT REPORTED HAVING A REACTION TO THE UNIT CAUSING BURNS ON THE RIGHT LEG. PATEINT STATES IT STARTED THE FIRST DAY OF TREATMENT BUT THE UNIT DID NOT GET HOT, HE JUST HAD A REACTION. PATIENT DISCONTINUED USE. NO FURTHER DETAILS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Burn(s)

    MAUDE report 23029128 ↗
  • InjuryMay 8, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT STATED THE PATIENT WAS SHOCKED DURING TREATMENT BY THE DEVICE. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS A RED BURN MARK WHERE THE DEVICE SITS.

    Patient problems: Burn(s)

    MAUDE report 21987456 ↗
  • InjuryMar 24, 2025Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    PATIENT CALLED AND REPORTED FEELING HOT SPOTS ALL OVER BODY (SIDE, STOMACH, THIGH) STARTING A WEEK AGO FROM TODAY. HIPS AND BACK WERE FEELING UNSTABLE AND UNABLE TO WALK. HIPS FEEL LIKE THEY ARE GOING TO GIVE OUT. PATIENT DISCONTINUED USING THE DEVICE. SHE WAS ADVISED TO CONTACT HER PHYSICIAN AND SHE STATED SHE HAS NOT CONTACTED PROVIDER.

    Patient problems: Muscle Weakness/Atrophy

    MAUDE report 21680297 ↗
  • InjuryMar 20, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    PATIENT CALLED CUSTOMER SERVICE AND REPORTED THAT THE 655212-0001 SPINAL STIM DEVICE GAVE HER A BURN. PATIENT REPORTED THAT SHE WAS WEARING A METAL WIRE IN HER BRA AND THE DEVICE BURNED HER WHERE THE WIRE SITS. THREE ATTEMPTS VIA PHONE CALL WERE MADE TO RETRIEVE THE DEVICE FOR INVESTIGATION BUT WE WERE UNABLE TO REACH THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Burning Sensation

    MAUDE report 21655055 ↗
  • InjuryNov 22, 2017Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation; Device Operates Differently Than Expected

    INFORMATION PROVIDED STATES THAT DURING INITIAL TREATMENT WITH BONE GROWTH STIMULATOR PATIENT WAS PHYSICALLY SHOCKED IN HER HIP AREA WHERE SHE HAS A IMPLANTED BLADDER STIMULATOR, MEDTRONIC MODEL 3037. PATIENT HAD FOLLOW UP WITH UROLOGIST AND WAS TOLD THAT HER BLADDER STIMULATOR HAD BEEN DAMAGED BY THE BONE GROWTH STIMULATOR. PATIENT MAY REQUIRE REVISION SURGERY TO REPAIR/REPLACE HER BLADDER STIMULATOR.

    Patient problems: Shock from Patient Lead(s)

    MAUDE report 7053282 ↗

Other Stimulator, Bone Growth, Non-Invasive devices

All Stimulator, Bone Growth, Non-Invasive devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.