Skip to content

FIREBIRD NXG 36-2101Recalls & reported problems

Orthofix US LLC · TOP LOADING BODY · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 18257200110254), received between Feb 3, 2025 and Feb 6, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 2 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 6, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WENT TO A ROUTINE FOLLOW UP VISIT AFTER A DECOMPRESSION AND FUSION WITH THE USE OF FENESTERATED SCREWS THAT WERE IMPLANTED (B)(6) 2024. THE FOLLOW UP EXAM CONSISTED OF IMAGING THAT SHOWED SET SCREW BACKED OUT ON AN L2 -PELVIS JANUSUS FENESTRATED CASE. THE PATIENT REQUIRED A REVISION SURGERY THAT TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2025. NO SYMPTOMS WERE REPORTED BY PATIENT. UPON FURTHER DISCUSSION WITH THE DISTRIBUTOR, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE 36-2101 TOP LOADING BODY WAS NOT EXPLANTED FROM THE PATIENT, NOR INVOLVED IN A MALFUNCTION OR ADVERSE EVENT. THIS FOLLOW UP REPORT IS TO CANCEL THIS SUBMISSION. PLEASE REFERENCE MFR REPORT NUMBER 2183449-2025-00005 FOR THE SUBJECT DEVICE AND REPORT.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 21327028 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 3, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WENT TO A ROUTINE FOLLOW UP VISIT AFTER A DECOMPRESSION AND FUSION WITH THE USE OF FENESTERATED SCREWS THAT WERE IMPLANTED (B)(6) 2024. THE FOLLOW UP EXAM CONSISTED OF IMAGING THAT SHOWED SET SCREW BACKED OUT ON AN L2 -PELVIS JANUSUS FENESTRATED CASE. THE PATIENT REQUIRED A REVISION SURGERY THAT TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2025. NO SYMPTOMS WERE REPORTED BY PATIENT. UPON FURTHER DISCUSSION WITH THE DISTRIBUTOR, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE 36-2101 TOP LOADING BODY WAS NOT EXPLANTED FROM THE PATIENT, NOR INVOLVED IN A MALFUNCTION OR ADVERSE EVENT. THIS FOLLOW UP REPORT IS TO CANCEL THIS SUBMISSION. PLEASE REFERENCE MFR REPORT NUMBER 2183449-2025-00001 FOR THE SUBJECT DEVICE AND REPORT.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 21293365 ↗

Other Thoracolumbosacral pedicle screw system devices

All Thoracolumbosacral pedicle screw system devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page