Skip to content

Kendall 22855 (REF 22855-)Recalls & reported problems

Cardinal Health 200, LLC · Kendall 855 FOAM ELECTRODES, Conductive Adhesive Hydrogel, Radiolucent · Class 2

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 20192253016755), received between Aug 25, 2025 and Aug 25, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Fluid Discharge1
  • Full thickness (Third Degree) Burn1
  • Necrosis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 25, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THEY HAD AN INCIDENT WITH ELECTRODE 22855 AND A PATIENT WAS HARMED IN THE MRI. ON 19AUG2025 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING THAT THE PATIENT HAD AN MRCP ORDERED AND AFTER THE EXAM, WHICH LASTED ABOUT 15 MINUTES, THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF WARMTH TO THE UPPER LEFT CHEST. IT WAS DETERMINED THAT ONE OF THE FOAM ELECTRODES ON THE UPPER LEFT CHEST HAD BEEN LEFT DURING THE EXAM. THE PATIENT HAD BEEN SCANNED FOR METAL, BUT THIS ELECTRODE DOES NOT SCAN. THE TECH LOOKED UNDER THE ELECTRODE IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SCAN AND ONLY SAW SLIGHT REDNESS. THE PATIENT HAS BEEN SEEN AT THE WOUND CARE CENTER FOR TREATMENT OF THE BURN. THE WOUND HAS BEEN CLASSIFIED AS A 3RD DEGREE BURN. IT WAS STATED THAT THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE WERE FOLLOWED. ON 21AUG2025 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING THAT 8 DAYS AFTER THE EVENT THE PATIENT WAS SEEN AT THE WOUND CARE CENTER (B)(6) 2025). THE PHYSICIAN DOCUMENTED A L ANTERIOR CHEST WALL 3RD DEGREE, FULL THICKNESS THERMAL BURN. THE WOUND WAS DEBRIDED, SILVADENE WAS CONTINUED. THE PATIENT WAS SEEN AGAIN ON (B)(6) 2025, THE WOUND IS CLASSIFIED AS FULL THICKNESS AND MEASURES 3.9CM LENGTH, 2.6CM WIDTH, 0.3CM DEPTH, 7.964CM/2

    Patient problems: Fluid Discharge; Full thickness (Third Degree) Burn; Necrosis

    MAUDE report 22890258 ↗

Other Electrode, electrocardiograph devices

All Electrode, electrocardiograph devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.