RAD® 1882916 (UDI 20721902755051)Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · BLADE 1882916 RAD60 3PK SINUS 2.9MM · Class 1
All models of RAD (29)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20721902755051), received between Jan 30, 2023 and Jul 22, 2025 — classified as 7 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Vibration” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Vibration6
- Break1
- Noise, Audible1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 22, 2025Vibration; Vibration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING INTRA OP USER WAS TRYING TO USE THE MICRODEBRIDER AND THE ATTACHMENT RAD60 WAS FULLY SEATED BUT RATTLING OUT WHEN THEY TRIED TO PRESS THE FOOT SWITCH. THEY GOT A NEW RAD60, AND THEY DID NOT HAVE THE SAME ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22563645 ↗MalfunctionMay 26, 2025Vibration; Vibration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY THERE WAS NO NOTICEABLE DAMAGE ON BLADE OR PACKAGE. BLADE WAS WOBBLY WHEN IT WAS IN OPERATION. (SWAYING LEFT/RIGHT). ISSUE WAS NOTICED AT THE BEGINNING OF USE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH BACKUP PRODUCT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22083049 ↗MalfunctionMar 24, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED DURING INTRA-OP FOR FESS PROCEDURE THAT THE DEVICE HAD USED BLADE 30 SECONDS HEARD GRINDING AND DAMAGED, STOPPED. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH BACK-UP PRODUCTS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21674742 ↗MalfunctionApr 29, 2024Vibration; Vibration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT INTRA-OPERATIVELY, USER SEEDED BLADE INTO HANDPIECE, THERE WAS CONSIDERABLE VIBRATION. USER TRIED RESETTING THE BLADE AND LOCKING THE BLADE BUT THE VIBRATION WAS CONSIDERABLE. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE ANOTHER BLADE. THERE WAS DELAY OF THREE MINUTES. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19199664 ↗MalfunctionDec 1, 2023Vibration; Vibration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING NORMAL FUNCTIONAL ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY, THE BLADE STARTED GRINDING NOISE WHEN ENGAGES. WHEN HAND PIECE WAS IN UNLOCKED POSITION, ENTIRE BLADE ROTATED 360 DEGREES. WHEN LOCKED THE DISTAL END OF BLADE VIBRATED. THE VIBRATING DEVICE WAS USED ON A PATIENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT ASSOCIATED WITH THE EVENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH BACKUP PRODUCT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18244054 ↗MalfunctionNov 28, 2023Vibration; Noise, Audible; Vibration; Noise, Audible
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING NORMAL FUNCTIONAL ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY, THE BLADE STARTED GRINDING NOISE WHEN ENGAGED. BASICALLY, WHEN THE SURGEON STEPPED ON THE FOOT PEDAL, THE ENTIRE BLADE WOULD ROTATE ON THE MICRODEBRIDER HANDPIECE. FOR EXAMPLE, THE RAD 60 WAS BENT UP AT THE 12 O¿CLOCK POSITION WHEN HE STEPPED ON THE FOOT PEDAL IT ROTATED FROM 12 TO 3 O¿CLOCK POSITION UNTIL HE STEPPED OFF THE FRONT PEDAL. THAT WAS WHEN THE HANDPIECE WAS UNLOCKED. WHEN THE HANDPIECE WAS LOCKED, THE DISTAL END OF THE BLADE WOULD VIBRATE SIGNIFICANTLY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH BACKUP PRODUCT. THERE WAS A PROCEDURAL DELAY OF LESS THAN 1 HOUR. THERE ARE NO PATIENT IMPLICATIONS OR AFFECTS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18213879 ↗MalfunctionJan 30, 2023Vibration; Vibration
A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) REPORTED THAT DURING FESS PROCEDURE, THE BLADE SEATED APPROPRIATELY BUT WHEN THE DOCTOR HIT THE FOOT PEDAL IT WOBBLED. THEY STOPPED USING THE BLADE AND REPLACED IT WITH ANOTHER TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH BACKUP PRODUCT(S). THERE WAS NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16262682 ↗
Other BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT devices
- Quadcut® 1884380HRMedtronic Xomed, Inc. · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall7 reports
- Silver Bullet® 1882905HREMedtronic Xomed, Inc. · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall3 reports
- Diego Elite MBUR6060FRCVGyrus ACMI, LLC · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall2 reports
- Quadcut® 1884380HREMedtronic Xomed, Inc. · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall1 report
- RAD® 1882916Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall1 report
- N/A 1884032Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall0 reports
- DIEGO ELITE MBUR5060FRCVGyrus ACMI, LLC · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall0 reports
- Tricut® 1884033HREMedtronic Xomed, Inc. · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page