Skip to content

Shiley 5.0PEF (UDI 20884521779799)Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Pediatric Tracheostomy Tube Cuffless · Class 2

Adverse event reports
22
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 22 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20884521779799), received between May 10, 2021 and Jul 31, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 21 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Physical Resistance/Sticking” (8 reports).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K122531, K182861); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 4 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 4 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 2 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 2 reportsJan 2026: 2 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 2 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520264
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Physical Resistance/Sticking8
  • Use of Device Problem6
  • Material Separation2
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn2
  • Component Missing1
  • Crack1
  • Defective Component1
  • Material Discolored1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions13
  • Unintended Extubation9
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Skin Inflammation/ Irritation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 22 most recent of 22 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 31, 2026Material Separation

    Patient problems: Unintended Extubation

    MAUDE report 50107870 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 31, 2026Material Separation

    Patient problems: Unintended Extubation

    MAUDE report 50107866 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 20, 2026Use of Device Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TRACHEOSTOMY TUBE'S FLANGES ALWAYS BREAK AT THE POINT WHERE THE NECK STRAP WAS ATTACHED. ONE EYELET WAS COMPLETELY BROKEN, ALWAYS ON THE SIDE WHERE TRACTION IS APPLIED. THE SECOND EYELET WAS CRACKED. THE TUBES WERE REPLACED.

    Patient problems: Unintended Extubation

    MAUDE report 24126223 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 20, 2026Use of Device Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TRACHEOSTOMY TUBE'S FLANGES ALWAYS BREAK AT THE POINT WHERE THE NECK STRAP WAS ATTACHED. ONE EYELET WAS COMPLETELY BROKEN, ALWAYS ON THE SIDE WHERE TRACTION IS APPLIED. THE SECOND EYELET WAS CRACKED. THE TUBES WERE REPLACED.

    Patient problems: Unintended Extubation

    MAUDE report 24126216 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 29, 2025Crack; Crack

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER ONE MONTH OF PATIENT USAGE, THE TRACHEOSTOMY CANNULA CRACKED WITH A COMPLETE SEPARATION OF THE TWO PARTS OF THE CANNULA. REPLACEMENT OF THE TUBE WAS DONE.

    Patient problems: Unintended Extubation

    MAUDE report 23919095 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 17, 2025Component Missing; Component Missing

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE OF THE TUBE, THE TRACHEOSTOMY CANNULA CRACKED AFTER THREE MONTHS OF PATIENT USAGE. REPLACEMENT OF THE TUBE WAS DONE.

    Patient problems: Unintended Extubation

    MAUDE report 23835300 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 13, 2025Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO USAGE, IT WAS FOUND THAT BOTH TRACH TUBE'S NECK FLANGE WERE DAMAGED, A CRACK FROM ONE PINHOLE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22797073 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 13, 2025Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO USAGE, IT WAS FOUND THAT BOTH TRACH TUBE'S NECK FLANGE WERE DAMAGED, A CRACK FROM ONE PINHOLE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22797002 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 22, 2025Material Discolored; Material Discolored

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE, THERE WAS A BLUE LIKE DYE DISCOLORATION ON THE TRACH AFTER 15 DAYS OF PATIENT USE AS SHOWN IN THE IMAGE ATTACHED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21882375 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 17, 2025Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE MOTHER WAS GIVING HER SON A BATH AND LIFTED UP HIS NECK TO CLEAN, A VERY LOUD LEAK OF AIR WAS HEARD COMING FROM THE TRACH. THE MOTHER EXAMINED THE TRACH AND NOTICED THAT THE SHAFT WAS SEVERED BELOW THE 15 MM CONNECTOR. THE MOTHER QUICKLY GOT ANOTHER TRACH AND REMOVED THAT ONE AND PUT IN A NEW TRACH WITHOUT ANY INCIDENT TO PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Unintended Extubation

    MAUDE report 21619837 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 11, 2025Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING INSPECTION, THE FOUR TRACHEOSTOMY TUBE'S INTRODUCER (OBTURATOR) WERE PRESENTING JAMMING IN THE TUBE THAT HINDERED THE REMOVAL AFTER TUBE PLACEMENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21353762 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 11, 2025Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING INSPECTION, THE FOUR TRACHEOSTOMY TUBE'S INTRODUCER (OBTURATOR) WERE PRESENTING JAMMING IN THE TUBE THAT HINDERED THE REMOVAL AFTER TUBE PLACEMENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21353697 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 11, 2025Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING INSPECTION, THE FOUR TRACHEOSTOMY TUBE'S INTRODUCER (OBTURATOR) WERE PRESENTING JAMMING IN THE TUBE THAT HINDERED THE REMOVAL AFTER TUBE PLACEMENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21353655 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 11, 2025Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING INSPECTION, THE FOUR TRACHEOSTOMY TUBE'S INTRODUCER (OBTURATOR) WERE PRESENTING JAMMING IN THE TUBE THAT HINDERED THE REMOVAL AFTER TUBE PLACEMENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21353547 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 4, 2024Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING INSPECTION, THE FOUR TRACHEOSTOMY TUBE'S INTRODUCER (OBTURATOR) WERE PRESENTING JAMMING IN THE TUBE THAT HINDERED THE REMOVAL AFTER TUBE PLACEMENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20603378 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 4, 2024Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING INSPECTION, THE FOUR TRACHEOSTOMY TUBE'S INTRODUCER (OBTURATOR) WERE PRESENTING JAMMING IN THE TUBE THAT HINDERED THE REMOVAL AFTER TUBE PLACEMENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20602414 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 4, 2024Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING INSPECTION, THE FOUR TRACHEOSTOMY TUBE'S INTRODUCER (OBTURATOR) WERE PRESENTING JAMMING IN THE TUBE THAT HINDERED THE REMOVAL AFTER TUBE PLACEMENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20602182 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 4, 2024Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING INSPECTION, THE FOUR TRACHEOSTOMY TUBE'S INTRODUCER (OBTURATOR) WERE PRESENTING JAMMING IN THE TUBE THAT HINDERED THE REMOVAL AFTER TUBE PLACEMENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20600499 ↗
  • InjuryDec 18, 2023Defective Component; Defective Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, SOMETHING LIKE A SCRATCH APPEARED ON THE PATIENT'S JAWS BECAUSE OF THE INCREASED HEIGHT OF THE CONNECTOR PART OF THE TRACHEOSTOMY TUBE.

    Patient problems: Skin Inflammation/ Irritation; Unintended Extubation

    MAUDE report 18351459 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 14, 2022Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE TUBE WAS BROKEN. THERE WAS NO REPORTED OUTCOME.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Unintended Extubation

    MAUDE report 15611905 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 10, 2021Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, PRIOR TO USE, THERE WERE CUTS WITH THE DEVICES' FLANGES. THE ONE SIDE OF BOTH DEVICES' FLANGES PINS WAS BROKEN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11798311 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 10, 2021Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, PRIOR TO USE, THERE WERE CUTS WITH THE DEVICES' FLANGES. THE ONE SIDE OF BOTH DEVICES' FLANGES PINS WAS BROKEN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11798249 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K122531, K182861. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-1951-2015 · May 8, 2015 · Terminated
    Shiley Neonatal, Pediatric and Long Pediatric Tracheostomy Tube with TaperGuard Cuff. Intended for use in providing tracheal access for airway managements.

Other Tube tracheostomy and tube cuff devices

All Tube tracheostomy and tube cuff devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.