Tricut® 1883504HRRecalls & reported problems
Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · BLADE 1883504HR TRICUT 5PK M4 3.5MM ROT · Class 1
All models of Tricut (17)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20885074080066), received between Jun 22, 2018 and May 27, 2024 — classified as 8 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break5
- Material Fragmentation3
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 27, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY, WHILE USING THE TRICUT BLADE THE TIP BROKE OFF AND THE STAFF WERE ABLE TO RETRIEVE THE PIECE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH BACKUP PRODUCT. THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19400350 ↗MalfunctionJan 30, 2024Break; Break
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED THAT THE OUTER PART OF THE BLADE WAS LOOSE AND CAME COMPLETELY OUT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18604945 ↗MalfunctionJun 30, 2023Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BUR TIP WAS BROKEN. USER SEARCHED FOR ANY BROKEN PARTS IN THE NOSE AND MOUTH. NO BROKEN PARTS WERE FOUND INSIDE THE BODY. THE PHYSICIAN SAID, "IT MAY HAVE ALREADY BEEN SUCTIONED BY DEVICE," AND CONTINUED THE CASE. THERE WAS 10 MIN OF PROCEDURE DELAY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH BACKUP PRODUCT. IMMEDIATELY AFTER USE, THERE WAS AN ABNORMAL NOISE FROM THE SHAVER. AS PER USER IT MIGHT BE A CLOG, THE SHAVER WAS UNCLOGGED, BUT THERE WAS NO CLOG. WHEN THE INNER TUBE WAS REMOVED, THE TIP WAS BROKEN. IT WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LOT PRODUCT AND THE CASE WAS CONTINUED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED AFTER FOLLOW UP THAT BLADE BROKEN WHILE USING THE SHAVER AND THERE WAS FRAGMENTS. AFTER THE DAMAGE, THE PHYSICIAN CHECKED THE INSIDE OF THE NASAL CAVITY AND THE THROAT, BUT IT COULD NOT BE FOUND. USER ASSUMES THAT IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN SUCKED IN USING THE SUCTIONING DEVICE, THERE WAS NOTHINGS SEEM REMAINING IN THE PATIENT. THERE NO ANY FRAGMENTS REMAIN IN THE PATIENT, THE FRAGMENTS REMOVED BY USING THE SUCTIONING DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17236716 ↗MalfunctionDec 4, 2022Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BLADE TIP BROKE SOON AFTER THE OPERATION STARTED. THERE ARE NO RESIDUALS INSIDE THE PATIENT. NOT PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15912588 ↗MalfunctionJul 24, 2022Break; Break
A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) REPORTED THAT DURING ESS PROCEDURE, THE THE ROTATION OF INNER CYLINDER IS POOR AND ITS STOPPED. UPON CHECKING, THE INNER CYLINDER WAS BROKEN AND COULD NOT BE USED ANYMORE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE USED OF BACKUP PRODUCT(S). THERE WAS NO ANY REMAINING DAMAGED PIECE IN THE PATIENT'S BODY. THERE WAS ABOUT 10 MINUTES PROCEDURE EXTENSION DUE TO THE OCCURRENCE OF A DEFECT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15090585 ↗MalfunctionJul 15, 2020Break; Break
ON FOLLOW UP IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE EVENT OCCURRED INTRA-OPERATIVELY. THERE WERE NO FRAGMENTS DETACHED FROM THE DEVICE. PROCEDURE DELAY WAS LESS THAN 30 MINS AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10274596 ↗MalfunctionFeb 7, 2019Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) REPORTED VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THE BLADE BROKE APART DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE INNER PORTION OF THE BLADE SEEMED TO HAVE SHEARED OFF DURING USE AFTER INITIALLY WORKING WELL. THE SHEARING RENDERED THE BLADE USELESS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM SINCE ALL PIECES OF THE BLADE WERE ACCOUNTED FOR.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8317536 ↗MalfunctionJun 22, 2018Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
DURING A PROCEDURE, THE TIP OF A TRICUT BLADE BROKE. THE DETACHED PIECE WAS RETRIEVED WITHOUT INTERVENTION OR ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7629414 ↗
Other BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT devices
- Quadcut® 1884380HRMedtronic Xomed, Inc. · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall7 reports
- Silver Bullet® 1882905HREMedtronic Xomed, Inc. · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall3 reports
- Diego Elite MBUR6060FRCVGyrus ACMI, LLC · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall2 reports
- Quadcut® 1884380HREMedtronic Xomed, Inc. · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall1 report
- RAD® 1882916Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall1 report
- N/A 1884032Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall0 reports
- DIEGO ELITE MBUR5060FRCVGyrus ACMI, LLC · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall0 reports
- Tricut® 1884033HREMedtronic Xomed, Inc. · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page