Skip to content

RAD® 1884012HRRecalls & reported problems

Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · BLADE 1884012HR RAD12 5PK M4 4MM ROTATE · Class 1

All models of RAD (29)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
10
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20885074080608), received between Sep 14, 2017 and Jul 11, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 9 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Material Separation3
  • Material Fragmentation2
  • Failure to Cut1
  • Mechanical Jam1
  • Stretched1
  • Use of Device Problem1
  • Vibration1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient7
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
  • Radiation Exposure, Unintended1

Recent adverse event reports

The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 11, 2025Vibration; Vibration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PROCEDURE, PATIENT WAS ANESTHETIZED , HANDPIECE CONNECTED TO IPC CONSOLE, RAD 12 BLADE CONNECTED TO HANDPIECE, PEDAL TEST WAS OK. THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE WAS BEGAN AND IMMEDIATELY STARTED USING THE SHAVER, WHICH WAS WORKING PERFECTLY ON THE NASAL STRUCTURES. HOWEVER, AT A CERTAIN POINT, THE RAD12 BLADE BEGAN TO VIBRATE. PHYSICIAN STOPPED USING THE DEVICE, REMOVED THE BLADE AND REPLACED IT WITH TRICUT STRAIGHT BLADE, THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH BACKUP PRODUCT(S). THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22485207 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 6, 2025Break; Failure to Cut; Break; Failure to Cut

    EXPIRATION DATE WAS NOT NOTICED PRIOR TO THE BLADE USAGE AND THE BLADE PACKAGE STILL SEALED (STERILE BARRIER NOT COMPROMISED) PRIOR TO USE IN THIS SURGERY THE BLADE WAS CUTTING FOR APPROXIMATELY 10-15 MINUTES AND IT STOPPED WORKING WHILE USING IN A PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21078928 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 12, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation

    A HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) REPORTED THAT WHEN THE NEW PRODUCT WAS OPENED DURING SET-UP, THE TIP HAD BEEN BROKEN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9824204 ↗
  • InjuryJan 2, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation

    A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER (HCP) REPORTED VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT IN THE MIDDLE OF A SEPTOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE EXTERNAL TIP OF THE PRODUCT BROKE OFF AND WAS FIRST NOTICED BY THE NURSE WHEN SHE RECEIVED IT BACK FROM THE SURGEON. WHEN THE SURGEON CHECKED THE NASAL CAVITY, HE COULD NOT FIND THE TIP. AFTER AN EXTENSIVE SEARCH AND LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY (LMA) WAS REMOVED, X-RAY WAS DONE AND CONFIRMED THAT THE MISSING TIP WAS IN THE PATIENT¿S STOMACH. A REPLACEMENT DEVICE WAS USED TO FINISH THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS A 30-MINUTE DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE BROKEN PIECE REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT'S BODY. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED FROM THEATRE.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; Radiation Exposure, Unintended

    MAUDE report 9537825 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 18, 2019Material Separation; Mechanical Jam; Material Separation; Mechanical Jam

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) REPORTED VIA MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT WHEN THEY ATTACHED THE BLADE TO THE HANDPIECE DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BLADE STOPPED RUNNING AND BROKE INTO TWO SEGMENTS. THERE WERE NO INTERVENTION PLANNED OR PERFORMED. THERE WERE NO BROKEN PIECES REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENTS BODY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH BACKUP PRODUCT(S). THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9488329 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 6, 2019Material Fragmentation; Use of Device Problem; Material Fragmentation; Use of Device Problem

    A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER (HCP) REPORTED VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THE BLADE WAS SCATTERING FROM BEFORE CONNECTING AND THERE WAS AN ANOMALY OF THE PRODUCT. THE PROCEDURE WAS DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY (DCR) SURGERY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A BACKUP DEVICE. THE PATIENT WAS ALIVE WITH NO INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8312526 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 7, 2018Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE BLADE FELL APART WHILE BEING USED DURING AN ENDO SINUS MAXILLARY AND ETHMOID PROCEDURE. THE TIP OF THE BLADE BROKE OFF INTO THE CAVITY; HOWEVER, THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT OR INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7579573 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 24, 2018Break; Break

    THE NURSE SAID THE BUR SUDDENLY DAMAGED WHEN IT WAS BEING USED. NO PATIENT IMPACT OR INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7539924 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 1, 2018Break; Break

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE BLADE BROKE WHILE THE SURGEON STARTED USING IT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT OR INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7308083 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 14, 2017Stretched; Stretched

    THE PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT WHILE USING THE RAD 12 BLADE THE INNER CYLINDER OF THE DEVICE WAS BROKEN. IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT AFTER ST RETCHING, A FRAGMENT OF THE SPIRAL WRAP DETACHED; HOWEVER, IT DID NOT FALL INTO THE PATIENT OR REQUIRE RETRIEVAL. A BACK-UP BLADE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6866822 ↗

Other BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT devices

All BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page