RAD® 1884012HRRecalls & reported problems
Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · BLADE 1884012HR RAD12 5PK M4 4MM ROTATE · Class 1
All models of RAD (29)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 10
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20885074080608), received between Sep 14, 2017 and Jul 11, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 9 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break3
- Material Separation3
- Material Fragmentation2
- Failure to Cut1
- Mechanical Jam1
- Stretched1
- Use of Device Problem1
- Vibration1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient7
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
- Radiation Exposure, Unintended1
Recent adverse event reports
The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 11, 2025Vibration; Vibration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PROCEDURE, PATIENT WAS ANESTHETIZED , HANDPIECE CONNECTED TO IPC CONSOLE, RAD 12 BLADE CONNECTED TO HANDPIECE, PEDAL TEST WAS OK. THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE WAS BEGAN AND IMMEDIATELY STARTED USING THE SHAVER, WHICH WAS WORKING PERFECTLY ON THE NASAL STRUCTURES. HOWEVER, AT A CERTAIN POINT, THE RAD12 BLADE BEGAN TO VIBRATE. PHYSICIAN STOPPED USING THE DEVICE, REMOVED THE BLADE AND REPLACED IT WITH TRICUT STRAIGHT BLADE, THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH BACKUP PRODUCT(S). THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22485207 ↗MalfunctionJan 6, 2025Break; Failure to Cut; Break; Failure to Cut
EXPIRATION DATE WAS NOT NOTICED PRIOR TO THE BLADE USAGE AND THE BLADE PACKAGE STILL SEALED (STERILE BARRIER NOT COMPROMISED) PRIOR TO USE IN THIS SURGERY THE BLADE WAS CUTTING FOR APPROXIMATELY 10-15 MINUTES AND IT STOPPED WORKING WHILE USING IN A PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21078928 ↗MalfunctionMar 12, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation
A HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) REPORTED THAT WHEN THE NEW PRODUCT WAS OPENED DURING SET-UP, THE TIP HAD BEEN BROKEN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9824204 ↗InjuryJan 2, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation
A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER (HCP) REPORTED VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT IN THE MIDDLE OF A SEPTOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE EXTERNAL TIP OF THE PRODUCT BROKE OFF AND WAS FIRST NOTICED BY THE NURSE WHEN SHE RECEIVED IT BACK FROM THE SURGEON. WHEN THE SURGEON CHECKED THE NASAL CAVITY, HE COULD NOT FIND THE TIP. AFTER AN EXTENSIVE SEARCH AND LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY (LMA) WAS REMOVED, X-RAY WAS DONE AND CONFIRMED THAT THE MISSING TIP WAS IN THE PATIENT¿S STOMACH. A REPLACEMENT DEVICE WAS USED TO FINISH THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS A 30-MINUTE DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE BROKEN PIECE REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT'S BODY. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED FROM THEATRE.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; Radiation Exposure, Unintended
MAUDE report 9537825 ↗MalfunctionDec 18, 2019Material Separation; Mechanical Jam; Material Separation; Mechanical Jam
A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) REPORTED VIA MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT WHEN THEY ATTACHED THE BLADE TO THE HANDPIECE DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BLADE STOPPED RUNNING AND BROKE INTO TWO SEGMENTS. THERE WERE NO INTERVENTION PLANNED OR PERFORMED. THERE WERE NO BROKEN PIECES REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENTS BODY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH BACKUP PRODUCT(S). THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9488329 ↗MalfunctionFeb 6, 2019Material Fragmentation; Use of Device Problem; Material Fragmentation; Use of Device Problem
A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER (HCP) REPORTED VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THE BLADE WAS SCATTERING FROM BEFORE CONNECTING AND THERE WAS AN ANOMALY OF THE PRODUCT. THE PROCEDURE WAS DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY (DCR) SURGERY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A BACKUP DEVICE. THE PATIENT WAS ALIVE WITH NO INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8312526 ↗MalfunctionJun 7, 2018Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE BLADE FELL APART WHILE BEING USED DURING AN ENDO SINUS MAXILLARY AND ETHMOID PROCEDURE. THE TIP OF THE BLADE BROKE OFF INTO THE CAVITY; HOWEVER, THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT OR INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7579573 ↗MalfunctionMay 24, 2018Break; Break
THE NURSE SAID THE BUR SUDDENLY DAMAGED WHEN IT WAS BEING USED. NO PATIENT IMPACT OR INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7539924 ↗MalfunctionMar 1, 2018Break; Break
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE BLADE BROKE WHILE THE SURGEON STARTED USING IT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT OR INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7308083 ↗MalfunctionSep 14, 2017Stretched; Stretched
THE PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT WHILE USING THE RAD 12 BLADE THE INNER CYLINDER OF THE DEVICE WAS BROKEN. IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT AFTER ST RETCHING, A FRAGMENT OF THE SPIRAL WRAP DETACHED; HOWEVER, IT DID NOT FALL INTO THE PATIENT OR REQUIRE RETRIEVAL. A BACK-UP BLADE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6866822 ↗
Other BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT devices
- Quadcut® 1884380HRMedtronic Xomed, Inc. · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall7 reports
- Silver Bullet® 1882905HREMedtronic Xomed, Inc. · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall3 reports
- Diego Elite MBUR6060FRCVGyrus ACMI, LLC · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall2 reports
- Quadcut® 1884380HREMedtronic Xomed, Inc. · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall1 report
- RAD® 1882916Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall1 report
- N/A 1884032Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall0 reports
- DIEGO ELITE MBUR5060FRCVGyrus ACMI, LLC · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall0 reports
- Tricut® 1884033HREMedtronic Xomed, Inc. · BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT1 recall0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page