Skip to content

NEOTRODE 1741-003Recalls & reported problems

Conmed Corporation · NEOTRODE II NEONATAL/PEDIATRIC ECG ELECTRODE · Class 2

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 30653405004336), received between Dec 26, 2023 and Dec 26, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 2 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2

Patient problems

  • Burn(s)1
  • Unspecified Tissue Injury1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 26, 2023Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER THAT THE 1741-003, ECG NEONATAL II,3 WIRE,TP,ADGEL WAS BEING USED AND ¿(B)(6) 2023: AN INJURY WAS CAUSED BY THE REMOVAL OF THE ELECTRODE DURING THE NEWBORN'S BATH, DESCRIBED VISUALLY AS A BURN. EXAT DATE IS UNKNOWN.¿. FURTHER ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN SENT; HOWEVER, TO DATE NO INFORMATION HAS BEEN OBTAINED. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED DUE TO THE REPORTED INJURY OF UNKNOWN DEGREE OF BURN.

    Patient problems: Burn(s)

    MAUDE report 18391753 ↗
  • InjuryDec 26, 2023Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    UPDATE: PER FURTHER ASSESSMENT RECEIVED ON (B)(6) 2024 CLARIFICATION REGARDING (24 WEEKS 1/7) WAS "THE BABY WAS 24 WEEKS + 1 DAY". IT WAS ALSO FOUND THAT "THE NURSE DOCUMENTED A BLACK SORE AT THE ELECTRODE SITE. IN THE NOTES, IT IS DOCUMENTED THAT THIS NEWBORN HAD SEVERAL BRUISES IN OTHER AREAS OF HIS BODY." IT WAS NOT SPECIFIED IN THE FILE, "BUT IT IS STANDARD PROCEDURE TO DRY THE SKIN BEFORE INSTALLING THE ELECTRODES." IT WAS NOT IN THE FILE IF THE ELECTRODE WAS DIFFICULT TO REMOVE. IT IS UNKNOWN IF MEDICAL SURGICAL/INTERVENTION WAS NEEDED AS "THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER CENTER (NOT RELATED TO THE ELECTRODE INJURY). SO, WE DON'T HAVE MUCH INFORMATION ABOUT THE NEWBORN." THERE WAS AN EXTENDED STAY AT THE HOSPITAL FOR THE PATIENT; HOWEVER, "NOT RELATED TO ELECTRODE WOUND". THE ELECTRODE WORKED WELL DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER THAT THE 1741-003, ECG NEONATALII,3 WIRE, TP, ADGEL WAS BEING USED ON (B)(6) 2023 AND ¿WE NOTICED A WOUND IN A VERY LARGE PREMATURE BABY (24 WEEKS 1/7). THE INJURY WAS DESCRIBED AS A BLACKENED WOUND AT THE ELECTRODE SITE ON THE LEFT.¿. FURTHER ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN SENT; HOWEVER, TO DATE NO INFORMA

    Patient problems: Unspecified Tissue Injury

    MAUDE report 18391750 ↗

Other Electrode, electrocardiograph devices

All Electrode, electrocardiograph devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.