Tegaderm™ 1877-2100Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 30707387769469), received between Aug 8, 2018 and Jan 17, 2019 — classified as 3 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryJan 17, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  A PHYSICIAN ALLEGED 1877-2100 3M¿ PICC/CVC SECUREMENT DEVICE + TEGADERM¿ CHG CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE I.V. SECUREMENT DRESSING DID NOT SECURE AN IJ (INTERNAL JUGULAR) CATHETER PROPERLY AND A PATIENT LOST HIS LINE IN THE ICU". THE PATIENT REPORTEDLY REQUIRED REINSERTION OF THEIR CENTRAL CATHETER.

  Patient problems: No Code Available

  MAUDE report 8256394 ↗
• InjuryAug 8, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  A NURSE REPORTED AN 1877-2100 3M PICC/CVC SECUREMENT DEVICE + TEGADERM CHG CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE IV SECUREMENT DRESSING WAS APPLIED TO A PATIENT'S NEW PICC INSERTION SITE. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED AND WAS TO CONTINUE HOME IV INFUSIONS. THE HOME CARE NURSE RETURNED SEVEN DAYS LATER FOR A DRESSING CHANGE AND THE INSERTION SITE WAS REPORTEDLY RED, HOT AND IRRITATED. THE PATIENT WAS SENT TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM FOR EVALUATION AND THE PICC CATHETER WAS REMOVED DUE TO SKIN CONDITION. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTEDLY HOSPITALIZED AND A NEW PICC LINE WAS REQUIRED. CULTURES OF THE BLOOD AND CATHETER TIP WERE NEGATIVE.

  Patient problems: Erythema; Reaction; Skin Irritation

  MAUDE report 7762851 ↗
• InjuryAug 8, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  A NURSE REPORTED AN 1877-2100 3M¿ PICC/CVC SECUREMENT DEVICE + TEGADERM¿ CHG CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE IV SECUREMENT DRESSING WAS APPLIED TO AN INPATIENT'S NEW PICC INSERTION SITE. WHEN THE DRESSING WAS CHANGED, SEVEN DAYS FOLLOWING APPLICATION, THE INSERTION SITE WAS REPORTEDLY RED, HOT AND IRRITATED. THE PICC CATHETER WAS REMOVED DUE TO SKIN CONDITION. THE NURSE REPORTED THE PATIENT REQUIRED A NEW PICC INSERTION.

  Patient problems: Erythema; Reaction; Skin Irritation

  MAUDE report 7762439 ↗