Monoject 8932PG2Recalls & reported problems
Cardinal Health, Inc. · Monoject Sharps Container, PGII, Gasketed Hinged Lid, Red, 12 Gallon · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 40884521022417), received between Jun 9, 2021 and Jul 28, 2021 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Component or Accessory Incompatibility” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Component or Accessory Incompatibility2
- Fail-Safe Problem2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Needle Stick/Puncture1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 28, 2021Component or Accessory Incompatibility; Component or Accessory Incompatibility
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE NEW SUBSTITUTE RED SHARPS CONTAINER IN EACH THEATRE POSE A SAFETY RISK. THE LIDS DO NOT PROPERLY FIT ON THE RED BUCKETS AND SCRUB NURSES ARE UNABLE TO SAFELY DISPOSE OF THEIR SHARPS USING THE FOOT PEDAL AS IT DOES NOT LIFT THE LID. ALSO THERE IS NO OPENING/HOLE IN THE LID TO PLACE SMALL SHARPS. THE END USER MUST USE THEIR HANDS TO LIFT THE LID AND RISKS A NEEDLE STICK/SHARP INJURY. IN ADDITION, THEY ARE UNABLE TO SEE HOW FULL THE BIN IS PRIOR TO OPENING. THE CUSTOMER FEELS THAT THIS IS NOT AN APPROPRIATE SAFE SUBSTITUTE. THERE HAVE BEEN NO INJURIES REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12242123 ↗MalfunctionJul 1, 2021Component or Accessory Incompatibility; Fail-Safe Problem; Component or Accessory Incompatibility; Fail-Safe Problem
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE LIDS DO NOT FIT PROPERLY AND THE OPENING DOES NOT KEEP SHARPS IN. THE SURGEON WAS DISPOSING HIS SHARPS AND OTHER SHARPS FLIPPED UP AND OUT OF THE BOX. NO ONE WAS INJURED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12103742 ↗InjuryJun 9, 2021Fail-Safe Problem; Fail-Safe Problem
CUSTOMER REPORTS: A CONTAMINATED NEEDLE STICK INJURY OCCURRED WHEN TRYING TO INSERT THE NEEDLE INTO THE SHARPS CONTAINER. THE NEW SHARPS CONTAINERS DO NOT OPEN SMOOTHLY OR ALL THE WAY MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO DISCARD OF A NEEDLE. THE LPN RECEIVED STANDARD FOLLOW UP TESTING AND REQUIRES NO ADDITIONAL FOLLOW UP TESTING.
Patient problems: Needle Stick/Puncture
MAUDE report 11965177 ↗
Other Container, sharps devices
- SharpSafety 8556HCardinal Health, Inc. · Container, Sharps65 reports
- Monoject 8507SACardinal Health, Inc. · Container, sharps13 reports
- BD Recykleen™ Sharps Collector 305160Becton, Dickinson And Company · Container, sharps6 reports
- Monoject 31142222Cardinal Health, Inc. · Container, sharps4 reports
- Monoject 8506YCardinal Health, Inc. · Container, sharps4 reports
- Monoject 8980SCardinal Health, Inc. · Container, sharps4 reports
- Monoject 8970YCardinal Health 200, LLC · Container, Sharps3 reports
- Monoject 85221RCardinal Health, Inc. · Container, sharps3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page