Skip to content

BioFlo 45872Recalls & reported problems

Navilyst Medical, Inc. · BioFlo PICC with Endexo Technology - 5F x 55cm Dual Lumen Catheter IR-145 Kit · Class 2 · Implant

All models of BioFlo (87)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI H965458720), received between Aug 17, 2021 and Dec 11, 2024 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Fluid/Blood Leak1
  • Infusion or Flow Problem1
  • Stretched1

Patient problems

  • Swelling/ Edema2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 11, 2024Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak

    A DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED THAT AN END-USER EXPERIENCED AN ISSUE WITH A BIO-STABLE 5F DL-55 CM IR-145 KIT NON-VALVED PICC. 48 HOURS POST PLACEMENT, A LEAK WAS OBSERVED AT THE INSERTION SITE WHEN INFUSING MEDICATION AND FLUIDS. THE PATIENT'S LEFT CUBITAL FOSSA WHERE PICC WAS LOCATED WAS OBSERVED TO SWOLLEN. THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED DUE TO REDUCED FLOW RATE AT BOTH LUMENS AND WORSENING SWELLING.

    Patient problems: Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 20901555 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 19, 2023Stretched; Infusion or Flow Problem; Stretched; Infusion or Flow Problem

    DURING THE INSERTION PROCEDURE OF A PICC FROM A BIO-STABLE 5F DL-55CM IR-145 KIT NON-VALVED KIT, UNDER FLUOROSCOPIC AND GUIDE-WIRE ASSISTANCE, THE PROVIDER WAS UNABLE TO RETRIEVE THE CATHETER THAT WAS THREADED OVER THE WIRE. AFTER MULTIPLE MANIPULATIONS, THE GUIDEWIRE WAS ABLE TO BE RETRIEVED, LEAVING THE CATHETER SUCCESSFULLY INSITU. THE NEXT DAY, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A COMPLAINT OF SWELLING AT THE PICC INSERTION SITE AT THE LEFT CUBITAL FOSSA. THE CATHETER WAS THEN REMOVED DUE TO REDUCE FLOW RATE IN BOTH LUMENS AND THE WORSENING SWELLING. IT WAS SUSPECTED CATHETER WAS OVERSTRETCHED OR LEAKING. UPON INSPECTION OF THE REMOVED CATHETER, IT WAS NOTED THE MID-PORTION OF THE CATHETER WAS STRETCHED OUT AND DEFECTIVE.

    Patient problems: Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 16771837 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 17, 2021Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove

    A DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED AN ISSUE THEIR CUSTOMER EXPERIENCED WHEN USING A BIO-STABLE 5F DL-55CM IR-145 KIT NON-VALVED PROCEDURE KIT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROVIDER WAS PERFORMING THE BIOFLO PICC INSERTION FOR A PEDIATRIC CASE UNDER SEDATION. ACCORDING TO THE END USER, "PEDIATRIC CASES CAN BE CHALLENGING DUE TO SMALL VEINS, BUT IT WAS SMOOTH PUNCTURE FOR THIS CASE INTO THE VEIN. BUT UNEXPECTEDLY, THE CHILD HAD A STENOSIS PROXIMAL TO THE PUNCTURE SITE, WHICH WAS NOT KNOWN ABOUT BEFORE HAND, AND IT DAMAGED THE GUIDE WIRE TIP." AFTER THE TIP OF GUIDE WIRE WAS DAMAGED, THE END USER WAS UNABLE PULL OUT THE WIRE FROM PUNCTURE NEEDLE AS IT STUCK AT NEEDLE TIP. THE PROVIDER HAD TO ABANDON THE ACCESS DUE TO THIS REASON. THE PROVIDER ENDED UP NEEDING TO RE-PUNCTURE ANOTHER VEIN, AND INSERTED THE CATHETER WITH THE AID OF ANOTHER GUIDE WIRE (MICRO-PUNCTURE SET GUIDE WIRE) AS THE TIP OF THE INITIAL WIRE WAS STUCK IN THE 1ST PUNCTURE NEEDLE TIP AND DAMAGED (NON-SALVAGEABLE). THE PHYSICIAN REPORTED TO THE DISTRIBUTOR A CONCERN ABOUT THE PATIENT BEING UNDER EXTENDED CONSCIOUS SEDATION FOR AN ADDITIONAL 45 MINUTES WHILE THE ISSUE WAS RESOLVED. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS, HAR

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12330925 ↗

Other Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days devices

All Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page