Penumbra Coil 400 4002C0512Recalls & reported problems
Penumbra, Inc. · PC400 Cplx Std, 5x12 · Class 2
All models of Penumbra Coil 400 (120)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI M4244002C05120), received between Sep 1, 2015 and Apr 6, 2017 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Separation Failure” (2 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K103305); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Separation Failure2
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 6, 2017Separation Failure; Separation Failure
THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE IN THE RIGHT INTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY (IIA) USING PENUMBRA COIL 400''S (PC400'S). DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN DEPLOYED AND DETACHED FIVE PC400'S INTO THE TARGET VESSEL USING A NON-PENUMBRA CATHETER AND A PENUMBRA COIL DETACHMENT HANDLE (HANDLE). THE PHYSICIAN THEN HAD DEPLOYED A SIXTH PC400 (LOT # A25537) INTO THE PATIENT BUT HAD DIFFICULTY DETACHING THE COIL USING THE SAME HANDLE. AFTER SEVERAL ATTEMPTS, THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO DETACH THE COIL. NEXT, THE PHYSICIAN DEPLOYED A SEVENTH PC400 (LOT # F70957) INTO THE PATIENT AND ATTEMPTED TO DETACH THE COIL USING THE SAME HANDLE. HOWEVER, AFTER SEVERAL ATTEMPTS, THE PC400 WAS UNABLE TO DETACH AND WAS REMOVED. THEREAFTER, THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A NEW PC400 AND THE SAME HANDLE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6465475 ↗MalfunctionSep 1, 2015Separation Failure
THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE IN THE RIGHT SUPERIOR GLUTEAL ARTERY USING PENUMBRA COIL 400 (PC400) COILS. DURING THE PROCEDURE, A PC400 COIL WAS SUCCESSFULLY DEPLOYED INTO THE ANEURYSM; HOWEVER, THE PC400 COIL WOULD NOT DETACH USING A PENUMBRA COIL 400 DETACHMENT HANDLE. AFTER SEVERAL ATTEMPTS, THE PHYSICIAN REPOSITIONED THE MICROCATHETER, BUT THE PC400 COIL WOULD NOT DETACH. THE PC400 COIL WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AND THE PROCEDURE CONTINUED USING A NEW COIL. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 5047948 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K103305. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1906-2011 · Mar 4, 2011 · TerminatedPenumbra brand Penumbra Coil System, Penumbra Coil 400, Product is manufactured and distributed by Penumbra Inc., Alameda, CA The Penumbra Coil System (Penumbra Coil 400 TM) is in
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page