Penumbra Coil 400 4004C1020Recalls & reported problems
Penumbra, Inc. · PC400 Cplx XSft, 10x20 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Penumbra Coil 400 (120)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI M4244004C10200), received between Sep 25, 2015 and Oct 12, 2017 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Component Missing” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Component Missing1
- Detachment Of Device Component1
- Device Damaged Prior to Use1
- Out-Of-Box Failure1
Patient problems
- No Patient Involvement1
- Occlusion1
- Paresis1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 12, 2017Device Damaged Prior to Use; Component Missing; Out-Of-Box Failure; Device Damaged Prior to Use; Component Missing; Out-Of-Box Failure
WHILE PREPARING A PENUMBRA COIL 400 (PC400) FOR A COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, THE HOSPITAL STAFF OPENED THE PACKAGING AND NOTICED THAT THE PC400 EMBOLIZATION COIL WAS MISSING. THE MISSING EMBOLIZATION COIL WAS NOTICED PRIOR TO USE AND THEREFORE, THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER PC400.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 6945328 ↗MalfunctionSep 25, 2015Detachment Of Device Component
THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE USING A PENUMBRA COIL 400 (PC400 COIL). DURING THE PROCEDURE WHILE DEPLOYING THE PC400 COIL IN THE ANEURYSM, THE COIL UNINTENTIONALLY DETACHED AND CAUSED OCCLUSION OF THE LEFT MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY, RESULTING IN A RIGHT SIDE HEMIPLEGIA. A STENT RETRIEVER WAS USED TO REMOVE THE PC400 COIL. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO ADVANCE A NEW PC400 COIL TO THE ANEURYSM BUT MET RESISTANCE AND THE COIL WAS REMOVED; THE PROCEDURE DID NOT CONTINUE ANY FURTHER.
Patient problems: Occlusion; Paresis
MAUDE report 5105844 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page