Penumbra Coil 400 4004C1235Recalls & reported problems
Penumbra, Inc. · PC400 Cplx XSft, 12x35 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Penumbra Coil 400 (120)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI M4244004C12350), received between Jan 30, 2017 and Jul 11, 2019 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Advance” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Advance1
- Physical Resistance1
- Physical Resistance/Sticking1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 11, 2019Failure to Advance; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Failure to Advance; Physical Resistance/Sticking
THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE IN THE INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA) USING PENUMBRA COIL 400S (PC400S). DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN SUCCESSFULLY PLACED A PC400 USING A PX SLIM DELIVERY MICROCATHETER (PX SLIM) AND NEURON 6F 070 DELIVERY CATHETER (NEURON 070). WHILE ATTEMPTING TO ADVANCE A NEW PC400, THE PHYSICIAN EXPERIENCED RESISTANCE AND THE PC400 WOULD NOT ADVANCE WITHIN ITS INTRODUCER SHEATH; THEREFORE, IT WAS REMOVED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SAME ISSUE OCCURRED WITH ANOTHER PC400. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A NEW PC400, THE SAME NEURON 070 AND SAME PX SLIM. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8780550 ↗MalfunctionJan 30, 2017Physical Resistance; Physical Resistance
THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE USING PENUMBRA COIL 400S (PC400'S). DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN EXPERIENCED RESISTANCE WHILE ADVANCING A PC400 THROUGH A PX SLIM DELIVERY MICROCATHETER (PX SLIM); THEREFORE, THE PC400 WAS REMOVED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING THE SAME PX SLIM, NINE NEW PC400'S, AND NON-PENUMBRA COILS. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN REPORTED USING A ROTATING HEMOSTASIS VALVE AND MAINTAINING CONTINUOUS FLUSH. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6287859 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page